Re: discussion and resolution of ISSUE-87

Hi Ben,

>  ISSUE-87: http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/87
>
>  should be relatively easy for us to resolve (like most issues we have so
>  far). Please read and respond with +1 or -1 to each point (with
>  explanation if necessary).
>
>
>  ===========
>  PROPOSED RESOLUTION:
>  - 5.3: move the @rel to a parent element, so that @src can complete it
>  appropriately. (currently using old syntax for @src.)

+1


>  - 5.4: accept Johannes's proposed text to clarify non-prefixed CURIEs
>  not yielding anything.

-1

Johannes is exactly right that the text is not detailed enough, but
I'm saying -1 only because I think we need to add something to another
section, too. I have no proposal yet, though.


>  - 5.5: in three parts:
>
>  (a) remove the wording "Note that final value of the [current object
>  resource] will either be null (from initialization), a full URI or a
>  bnode." as, according to MarkB [1], this is now part of Step 8.

The only part that needs removing is "or a bnode", since that's now
handled in step 8.

Now I'm now not sure whether I should add +1 or wait for it to come
round again. :)


>  (b) fix closing of <li>

+1


>  (c) fix step (10) (which will become step 9 because of the <li> fix) by
>  moving sub-step 3 to first position, as per MarkB [1], so that typed
>  literals are checked first.

+1

Regards,

Mark

-- 
  Mark Birbeck

  mark.birbeck@x-port.net | +44 (0) 20 7689 9232
  http://www.x-port.net | http://internet-apps.blogspot.com

  x-port.net Ltd. is registered in England and Wales, number 03730711
  The registered office is at:

    2nd Floor
    Titchfield House
    69-85 Tabernacle Street
    London
    EC2A 4RR

Received on Tuesday, 4 March 2008 13:55:19 UTC