W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > March 2008

Re: test case 0011

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 17:53:09 +0100
Message-ID: <47CD7E75.1020502@w3.org>
To: Johannes Koch <koch@w3development.de>
CC: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
Ouch. That hurts:-)

Reason: while I can see your argument, if we had to go down that route, 
it may create problems with implementations. I know I would have to 
change by throwing out the simple (and default) xml package I use (and 
that comes with the Python distribution) for a more powerful one (PyXML) 
because the simple one is not really namespace aware. I am not saying it 
is impossible, I am just saying this would create an extra load:-(

But, well, of the greater good, one may have to do that... I am curious 
to see the TF's reaction...


Johannes Koch wrote:
> Hi,
> the sparql query for test case 0011 
> (<http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/xhtml1-testcases/0011.sparql>) 
> contains the triple
> <http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/xhtml1-testcases/0011.xhtml> 
> <http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/title>
> "E = mc<sup>2</sup>: The Most Urgent Problem of Our Time"^^
>   <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#XMLLiteral> .
> In the test file 
> (<http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/xhtml1-testcases/0011.xhtml>) 
> the sup element is in the http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml namespace. 
> Shouldn't this be included somehow in the object literal?


Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf

Received on Tuesday, 4 March 2008 16:53:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:01:55 UTC