W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > March 2008

Re: quick one: ISSUE-91

From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 07:24:26 -0600
Message-ID: <47CD4D8A.4020900@aptest.com>
To: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
CC: RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>



Ben Adida wrote:
>
>
> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/91
>
> Read and respond with +1 or -1 and explanation. This one is a quickie.
>
> We have the following language:
>
> ======
> A. Other XML Languages
>
> "If a language includes @xml:base [XMLBASE], an RDFa parser for that 
> host language must process it, and use its value to set [base]."
+1
> ======
>
> The comment is that we shouldn't state a MUST for anything other than 
> XHTML1.1+RDFa.
>
> PROPOSED RESOLUTION: change wording to:
>
> "If an XML dialect that supports @xml:base eventually implements RDFa, 
> the RDFa parser for that host language will likely process @xml:base 
> and use its value to set [base]."
>
>
> -Ben

-- 
Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Tuesday, 4 March 2008 13:25:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:01:55 UTC