Re: Possible solutions for ISSUE 97

Ben Adida schrieb:
> So, regarding Test Case 11:
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/xhtml1-testcases/0011.xhtml
> 
> I believe we should include the xmlns declaration, and the SPARQL should 
> read:
> 
> ASK WHERE {
>     <http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/xhtml1-testcases/0011.xhtml> 
> <http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/creator> "Albert Einstein" .
>     <http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/xhtml1-testcases/0011.xhtml> 
> 
> <http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/title>
> "E = mc<sup xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml\">2</sup>: The Most 
> Urgent Problem of Our 
> Time"^^<http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#XMLLiteral> .
> 
> }

Depending on the parser used to parse the XHTML document and the method 
to create the XML Literal, there may also be more namespace 
mappings/atributes on the sup element:

xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" 
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xml:space="preserve"

which I believe come from some XHTML Modularization module with FIXED 
attribute values. A parser may read the document type definition 
referenced by the document and so add this information to the DOM even 
when it is not validating.

-- 
Johannes Koch
In te domine speravi; non confundar in aeternum.
                             (Te Deum, 4th cent.)