public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org from March 2008 by author

Al Gilman

• Re: request for extension to review RDFa Last Call. (Friday, 28 March)
• request for extension to review RDFa Last Call. (Friday, 28 March)

Ben Adida

• Re: new Primer (Monday, 31 March)
• new Primer (Saturday, 29 March)
• Re: request for extension to review RDFa Last Call. (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: request for extension to review RDFa Last Call. (Friday, 28 March)
• Telecon Agenda, Thursday 27 March 2008, 1500 UTC == *EUROPE* still one hour earlier (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: Community outreach with a cheat sheet! (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: Community outreach with a cheat sheet! (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: Community outreach with a cheat sheet! (Tuesday, 25 March)
• ISSUE-97: resolution from last week (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: Is there any way to exclude prefixes from results? (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: Comments on RDFa in XHTML Syntax draft (Monday, 24 March)
• Re: Request extension for last call comments (Sunday, 23 March)
• Re: Reviewing Last Call RDFa (Friday, 21 March)
• Re: New web app to automatically mark up sites with RDFa (Friday, 21 March)
• Re: super easy issues: ISSUE-93, ISSUE-94, ISSUE-95 (Friday, 21 March)
• Re: ISSUE-96 (Friday, 21 March)
• Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: Comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-rdfa-syntax-20080221 (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: markup stripping with @datatype (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: Meeting Agenda, *UPDATED* (Thursday, 20 March)
• Meeting Agenda, Thursday 1500 UTC, still an hour early for Europeans (Thursday, 20 March)
• RDFa Last Call Comment: garbage collecting "useless" triples doesn't seem necessary and could hurt authors as they write RDFa (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: Comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-rdfa-syntax-20080221 (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: Comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-rdfa-syntax-20080221 (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: Possible solutions for ISSUE 97 (Thursday, 20 March)
• Possible solutions for ISSUE 97 (Wednesday, 19 March)
• Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed (Wednesday, 19 March)
• Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed (Tuesday, 18 March)
• test suite in JavaScript thanks to Elias (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Re: [RDFa Wiki] issues and feature request (Monday, 17 March)
• Re: Community outreach (Sunday, 16 March)
• ANNOUNCE: a new RDFa mailing list for web publishers. (Saturday, 15 March)
• Re: librdfa implementation updated to Last Call processing rules (Saturday, 15 March)
• Re: Serving XHTML as HTML -- still valid for RDFa (Friday, 14 March)
• Telecon Agenda, Thursday 13 March, *1500* UTC (Thursday, 13 March)
• update on RDFa wiki (Thursday, 13 March)
• ISSUE-6 related to ISSUE-97? (Wednesday, 12 March)
• Re: RDFa wiki copyright (Wednesday, 12 March)
• Re: RDFa wiki (Wednesday, 12 March)
• Re: RDFa wiki (Wednesday, 12 March)
• RDFa wiki (Tuesday, 11 March)
• Primer WD approved (Tuesday, 11 March)
• For Consideration: rapid approval of small updates the RDFa Primer (Monday, 10 March)
• Re: We need to start building a community (Re: Primer updated with a Changes section) (Sunday, 9 March)
• Re: Did you guys see this? (Sunday, 9 March)
• Re: We need to start building a community (Re: Primer updated with a Changes section) (Saturday, 8 March)
• Re: meeting record: 2008-03-06 RDF-in-XHTML TF telecon (Friday, 7 March)
• Re: We need to start building a community (Re: Primer updated with a Changes section) (Friday, 7 March)
• Re: We need to start building a community (Re: Primer updated with a Changes section) (Friday, 7 March)
• Re: Primer updated with a Changes section (Friday, 7 March)
• Primer updated with a Changes section (Thursday, 6 March)
• Agenda for Telecon Thursday, 1600 UTC. (Thursday, 6 March)
• a bit of levity (Thursday, 6 March)
• Re: quick one: ISSUE-91 (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Re: Comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-rdfa-syntax-20080221 (Tuesday, 4 March)
• super easy issues: ISSUE-93, ISSUE-94, ISSUE-95, ISSUE-96 (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Re: Comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-rdfa-syntax-20080221 (Tuesday, 4 March)
• quick one: ISSUE-91 (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Re: discussion and resolution of ISSUE-87 (Tuesday, 4 March)
• discussion and resolution of ISSUE-87 (Tuesday, 4 March)
• latest Primer edits (Monday, 3 March)
• Re: RDFa test case #1 missing @profile? (Monday, 3 March)

Benjamin Nowack

• EARL Report(s) for ARC (Monday, 3 March)
• RE: [RDFa TC] Status (Monday, 3 March)
• Re: [RDFa TC] Status (Monday, 3 March)
• Re: [RDFa TC] interpretation of TC results (Monday, 3 March)

Christopher St John

• Re: meeting record: 2008-03-06 RDF-in-XHTML TF telecon (Friday, 7 March)
• Re: We need to start building a community (Re: Primer updated with a Changes section) (Friday, 7 March)

Cindy Sue Causey

• Re: new Primer (Saturday, 29 March)

Dan Brickley

• Re: foaf:sha1 property with img src= (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: foaf:sha1 property with img src= (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: foaf:sha1 property with img src= (Monday, 31 March)
• foaf:sha1 property with img src= (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: LC comment: Don't discriminate against "useless" triples (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed (Friday, 21 March)
• Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: update on RDFa wiki (Thursday, 13 March)

Daniel E. Renfer

• Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: What is the correct set of triples for this case? (Wednesday, 12 March)
• Re: We need to start building a community (Re: Primer updated with a Changes section) (Friday, 7 March)

Daniel Renfer

• Re: foaf:sha1 property with img src= (Monday, 31 March)

Danny Ayers

• Re: Reviewing Last Call RDFa (Friday, 21 March)

David Peterson

• RE: Community outreach with a cheat sheet! (Wednesday, 26 March)
• RE: Community outreach with a cheat sheet! (Wednesday, 26 March)
• RE: Community outreach with a cheat sheet! (Tuesday, 25 March)
• RE: Community outreach with a cheat sheet! (Tuesday, 25 March)
• RE: Community outreach with a cheat sheet! (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Community outreach with a cheat sheet! (Tuesday, 25 March)
• RE: New web app to automatically mark up sites with RDFa (Friday, 21 March)
• New web app to automatically mark up sites with RDFa (Friday, 21 March)
• RE: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed (Thursday, 20 March)
• SitePoint article on RDFa for next gen search engines (Monday, 17 March)
• Community outreach (Sunday, 16 March)
• RE: Serving XHTML as HTML -- still valid for RDFa (Friday, 14 March)
• Serving XHTML as HTML -- still valid for RDFa (Friday, 14 March)
• RE: Yahoo to support Semantic Web (Thursday, 13 March)
• RE: Yahoo to support Semantic Web (Thursday, 13 March)
• RE: RDFa wiki (Wednesday, 12 March)
• RE: We need to start building a community (Re: Primer updated with a Changes section) (Sunday, 9 March)

Elias Torres

• Re: Community outreach with a cheat sheet! (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Replace @instanceof with @kind (Monday, 24 March)
• Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed (Monday, 24 March)
• Re: Updated distiller plus some new tests (Monday, 24 March)
• Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: markup stripping with @datatype (Thursday, 20 March)
• Processing Step 10 (Tuesday, 18 March)
• markup stripping with @datatype (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Re: Last Call compliant implementation (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Re: Did you guys see this? (Sunday, 9 March)
• Did you guys see this? (Sunday, 9 March)

Fabien Gandon

• Re: Progress on the RDFa GRDDL transform (Friday, 28 March)
• Progress on the RDFa GRDDL transform (Friday, 28 March)

Gottfried Zimmermann

• RE: request for extension to review RDFa Last Call. (Friday, 28 March)

Hausenblas, Michael

• RE: Crazy Ivan can now generate EARL Reports (Monday, 31 March)
• RE: QueryParseException for SPARQL for test case 0099 (was: QueryParseException for SPARQL for test case 0011) (Sunday, 30 March)
• RE: QueryParseException for SPARQL for test case 0099 (was: QueryParseException for SPARQL for test case 0011) (Sunday, 30 March)
• RE: new Primer (Sunday, 30 March)
• RE: QueryParseException for SPARQL for test case 0099 (was: QueryParseException for SPARQL for test case 0011) (Saturday, 29 March)
• RE: QueryParseException for SPARQL for test case 0099 (was: QueryParseException for SPARQL for test case 0011) (Friday, 28 March)
• RE: Progress on the RDFa GRDDL transform (Friday, 28 March)
• [RDFa TC] Updates as of 2008-03-27 telecon (Friday, 28 March)
• RE: Crazy Ivan can now generate EARL Reports (Friday, 28 March)
• RE: Telecon Agenda, Thursday 27 March 2008, 1500 UTC == *EUROPE* still one hour earlier (Thursday, 27 March)
• [RDFa TC] update (Tuesday, 25 March)
• RE: Updated distiller plus some new tests (Friday, 21 March)
• RE: Possible solutions for ISSUE 97 (Thursday, 20 March)
• RE: The Self-Describing Web (Wednesday, 19 March)
• RE: Fuzzbot - A Semantic Web Processor for Firefox (Tuesday, 18 March)
• [RDFa Wiki] issues and feature request (Monday, 17 March)
• RE: RDFa wiki (Wednesday, 12 March)
• RE: Yahoo microsearch looking at RDFa, too (Wednesday, 12 March)
• RE: RDFa wiki (Wednesday, 12 March)
• RE: RDFa wiki (Wednesday, 12 March)
• [RDFa TC] interpretation of TC results - now implemented (Tuesday, 11 March)
• RE: Last Call compliant implementation (Monday, 10 March)
• RE: meeting record: 2008-03-06 RDF-in-XHTML TF telecon (Saturday, 8 March)
• RE: Agenda for Telecon Thursday, 1600 UTC. (Thursday, 6 March)
• RE: super easy issues: ISSUE-93, ISSUE-94, ISSUE-95, ISSUE-96 (Thursday, 6 March)
• RE: EARL Report(s) for ARC (Tuesday, 4 March)
• RE: EARL Report(s) for ARC (Monday, 3 March)
• RE: [RDFa TC] Status (Monday, 3 March)
• [RDFa TC] Status (Monday, 3 March)
• RE: additional test needed (Monday, 3 March)
• RE: test case 0005 (Monday, 3 March)
• RE: [RDFa TC] interpretation of TC results (Monday, 3 March)
• RE: [RDFa TC] interpretation of TC results (Monday, 3 March)
• [RDFa TC] interpretation of TC results (Monday, 3 March)

Holger Knublauch

• Re: Topbraid supports RDFa (Monday, 17 March)

Ivan Herman

• Re: new Primer (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: foaf:sha1 property with img src= (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: foaf:sha1 property with img src= (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: foaf:sha1 property with img src= (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: Progress on the RDFa GRDDL transform (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: Community outreach with a cheat sheet! (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: Updated distiller plus some new tests (Friday, 21 March)
• Updated distiller plus some new tests (Friday, 21 March)
• Re: Possible solutions for ISSUE 97 (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: Possible solutions for ISSUE 97 (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: Possible solutions for ISSUE 97 (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: Possible solutions for ISSUE 97 (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: garbage collecting "useless" triples doesn't seem necessary and could hurt authors as they write RDFa (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: Possible solutions for ISSUE 97 (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: Possible solutions for ISSUE 97 (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: Wrong link in RDFa Primer announcement (Wednesday, 19 March)
• Re: Fuzzbot - A Semantic Web Processor for Firefox (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Re: test suite in JavaScript thanks to Elias (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Re: Serving XHTML as HTML -- still valid for RDFa (Friday, 14 March)
• Re: Crazy Ivan (RDFa Test Harness) upgrade (Friday, 14 March)
• Re: Possible solutions for ISSUE 87 (Thursday, 13 March)
• Re: Possible solutions for ISSUE 87 (Thursday, 13 March)
• Re: Possible solutions for ISSUE 87 (Thursday, 13 March)
• Re: RDFa wiki (Wednesday, 12 March)
• Yahoo microsearch looking at RDFa, too (Wednesday, 12 March)
• Re: Last Call compliant implementation (Tuesday, 11 March)
• Re: RDF/XML and CURIEs (Monday, 10 March)
• Re: RDF/XML and CURIEs (Monday, 10 March)
• Re: Did you guys see this? (Sunday, 9 March)
• Re: We need to start building a community (Re: Primer updated with a Changes section) (Saturday, 8 March)
• Re: test case 0011 (Wednesday, 5 March)
• Re: test case 0011 (Wednesday, 5 March)
• Re: test case 0011 (Wednesday, 5 March)
• Re: test case 0011 (Wednesday, 5 March)
• Re: test case 0011 (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Re: ISSUE-89 (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Re: ISSUE-89 (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Re: ISSUE-89 (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Re: additional test needed (Monday, 3 March)
• Re: [RDFa TC] interpretation of TC results (Monday, 3 March)
• Re: additional test needed (Monday, 3 March)
• Re: [RDFa TC] interpretation of TC results (Monday, 3 March)
• Re: additional test needed (Sunday, 2 March)
• Re: Last Call comment on RDFa Syntax (Saturday, 1 March)

James Pickering

• Re: Serving XHTML as HTML -- still valid for RDFa (Saturday, 22 March)
• Re: Serving XHTML as HTML -- still valid for RDFa (Saturday, 22 March)

Jeremy Carroll

• Re: Possible solutions for ISSUE 87 (Thursday, 13 March)

Johannes Koch

• Re: QueryParseException for SPARQL for test case 0099 (was: QueryParseException for SPARQL for test case 0011) (Sunday, 30 March)
• Re: QueryParseException for SPARQL for test case 0099 (was: QueryParseException for SPARQL for test case 0011) (Saturday, 29 March)
• Re: QueryParseException for SPARQL for test case 0099 (was: QueryParseException for SPARQL for test case 0011) (Saturday, 29 March)
• QueryParseException for SPARQL for test case 0099 (was: QueryParseException for SPARQL for test case 0011) (Friday, 28 March)
• QueryParseException for SPARQL for test case 0011 (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: ISSUE-97: resolution from last week (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: Comments on RDFa in XHTML Syntax draft (Monday, 24 March)
• Re: Comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-rdfa-syntax-20080221 (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: Comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-rdfa-syntax-20080221 (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: Possible solutions for ISSUE 97 (Thursday, 20 March)
• Wrong link in RDFa Primer announcement (Wednesday, 19 March)
• ISSUE-88 resolution (Friday, 7 March)
• Re: test case 0011 (Wednesday, 5 March)
• Re: test case 0011 (Wednesday, 5 March)
• test case 0011 (Tuesday, 4 March)
• ISSUE-89 (was: Comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-rdfa-syntax-20080221) (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Re: Comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-rdfa-syntax-20080221 (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Re: test case 0005 (Monday, 3 March)
• test case 0005 (Monday, 3 March)

John Boyer

• Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed (Wednesday, 19 March)
• Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed (Tuesday, 18 March)
• RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed (Monday, 17 March)

Jonathan Rees

• Comments on "RDFa in XHTML: Syntax and Processing" (Friday, 21 March)

Karl Dubost

• Re: RDFa spotlight plug-in (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: RDFa spotlight plug-in (Monday, 31 March)
• RDFa spotlight plug-in (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: Community outreach with a cheat sheet! (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed (Friday, 21 March)

Laurens Holst

• Re: Comments on RDFa in XHTML Syntax draft (Monday, 24 March)
• Comments on RDFa in XHTML Syntax draft (Sunday, 23 March)

Manu Sporny

• Re: Crazy Ivan can now generate EARL Reports (Monday, 31 March)
• Crazy Ivan can now generate EARL Reports (Friday, 28 March)
• Meeting record: 2008-03-27 RDF-in-XHTML Task Force telecon (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: Community outreach with a cheat sheet! (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: Community outreach with a cheat sheet! (Tuesday, 25 March)
• librdfa 0.10.1 - Windows headers/binaries available (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: Possible solutions for ISSUE 97 (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: Fuzzbot - A Semantic Web Processor for Firefox (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Fuzzbot - A Semantic Web Processor for Firefox (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Re: Last Call compliant implementation (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Re: Crazy Ivan (RDFa Test Harness) upgrade (Friday, 14 March)
• librdfa implementation updated to Last Call processing rules (Friday, 14 March)
• Crazy Ivan (RDFa Test Harness) upgrade (Friday, 14 March)
• Re: Yahoo to support Semantic Web (Friday, 14 March)
• Yahoo to support Semantic Web (Thursday, 13 March)
• Re: RDFa wiki (Wednesday, 12 March)
• Re: RDFa wiki (Wednesday, 12 March)
• Re: Topbraid supports RDFa (Wednesday, 12 March)
• Re: RDFa wiki (Wednesday, 12 March)
• Re: RDFa wiki (Wednesday, 12 March)
• Re: RDFa wiki (Wednesday, 12 March)
• Re: Last Call compliant implementation (Tuesday, 11 March)
• Re: What format must an RDFa extractor service emit? (Monday, 10 March)
• Re: We need to start building a community (Re: Primer updated with a Changes section) (Sunday, 9 March)
• We need to start building a community (Re: Primer updated with a Changes section) (Friday, 7 March)
• RDFa Primer review (Friday, 7 March)
• Re: super easy issues: ISSUE-93, ISSUE-94, ISSUE-95, ISSUE-96 (Thursday, 6 March)

Mark Birbeck

• Re: foaf:sha1 property with img src= (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: foaf:sha1 property with img src= (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: foaf:sha1 property with img src= (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: foaf:sha1 property with img src= (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: request for extension to review RDFa Last Call. (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: Different results of different RDFa extractors (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: Community outreach with a cheat sheet! (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: Comments on RDFa in XHTML Syntax draft (Monday, 24 March)
• Re: Comments on RDFa in XHTML Syntax draft (Monday, 24 March)
• Re: Comments on RDFa in XHTML Syntax draft (Monday, 24 March)
• Re: Possible solutions for ISSUE 97 (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: Possible solutions for ISSUE 97 (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: Possible solutions for ISSUE 97 (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: Possible solutions for ISSUE 97 (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: markup stripping with @datatype (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: garbage collecting "useless" triples doesn't seem necessary and could hurt authors as they write RDFa (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: garbage collecting "useless" triples doesn't seem necessary and could hurt authors as they write RDFa (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: garbage collecting "useless" triples doesn't seem necessary and could hurt authors as they write RDFa (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: Possible solutions for ISSUE 97 (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: Possible solutions for ISSUE 97 (Wednesday, 19 March)
• Re: Community outreach (Sunday, 16 March)
• Re: Serving XHTML as HTML -- still valid for RDFa (Friday, 14 March)
• Re: Possible solutions for ISSUE 87 (Thursday, 13 March)
• Re: Possible solutions for ISSUE 87 (Thursday, 13 March)
• Re: What is the correct set of triples for this case? (Thursday, 13 March)
• Possible solutions for ISSUE 87 (Thursday, 13 March)
• Re: What is the correct set of triples for this case? (Wednesday, 12 March)
• Re: What is the correct set of triples for this case? (Wednesday, 12 March)
• Re: What is the correct triples for this case? (Wednesday, 12 March)
• Re: Yahoo microsearch looking at RDFa, too (Wednesday, 12 March)
• Re: Primer WD approved (Tuesday, 11 March)
• Re: We need to start building a community (Re: Primer updated with a Changes section) (Monday, 10 March)
• Re: RDF/XML and CURIEs (Monday, 10 March)
• Re: Relationship between RDFa spec and CURIE spec (Monday, 10 March)
• Re: Question about @src handling (Monday, 10 March)
• Re: super easy issues: ISSUE-93, ISSUE-94, ISSUE-95, ISSUE-96 (Friday, 7 March)
• Re: Primer updated with a Changes section (Friday, 7 March)
• Re: RDFa test case #1 missing @profile? (Friday, 7 March)
• Re: test case 0011 (Wednesday, 5 March)
• Re: test case 0011 (Wednesday, 5 March)
• Re: test case 0011 (Wednesday, 5 March)
• Re: ISSUE-89 (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Re: ISSUE-89 (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Re: ISSUE-89 (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Re: quick one: ISSUE-91 (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Re: discussion and resolution of ISSUE-87 (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Re: RDFa test case #1 missing @profile? (Monday, 3 March)
• Re: RDFa test case #1 missing @profile? (Monday, 3 March)

Martin McEvoy

• RE: Community outreach with a cheat sheet! (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: Is there any way to exclude prefixes from results? (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed (Friday, 21 March)
• Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed (Friday, 21 March)
• Is there any way to exclude prefixes from results? (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed (Thursday, 20 March)

Micah Dubinko

• LC comment: clarify situation around document fragments containing RDFa (Monday, 31 March)
• LC comment: Don't discriminate against "useless" triples (Monday, 31 March)
• LC comment: describe the algorithm in functional terms too (Monday, 31 March)
• LC comment: XSLT and conformance levels (Monday, 31 March)
• LC comment: Ambiguous "otherwise" step (Friday, 21 March)
• LC comment: missing summary text (Friday, 21 March)
• Request extension for last call comments (Friday, 21 March)
• Re: New web app to automatically mark up sites with RDFa (Friday, 21 March)
• Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: garbage collecting "useless" triples doesn't seem necessary and could hurt authors as they write RDFa (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Last Call processing in XSLT (Monday, 17 March)
• Re: What is the correct set of triples for this case? (Thursday, 13 March)
• Re: What is the correct set of triples for this case? (Wednesday, 12 March)
• What is the correct triples for this case? (Wednesday, 12 March)
• Last Call compliant implementation (Monday, 10 March)
• Question about @src handling (Sunday, 9 March)
• Relationship between RDFa spec and CURIE spec (Sunday, 9 March)

Mike Linksvayer

• RDFa wiki copyright (Wednesday, 12 March)

Misha Wolf

• RE: RDF/XML and CURIEs (Monday, 10 March)

Nathan Yergler

• Re: RDFa wiki (Thursday, 13 March)
• Re: RDFa wiki (Thursday, 13 March)
• Re: RDFa wiki (Thursday, 13 March)
• Re: RDFa wiki (Wednesday, 12 March)
• Re: RDFa wiki (Wednesday, 12 March)
• Re: RDFa wiki (Wednesday, 12 March)
• Re: We need to start building a community (Re: Primer updated with a Changes section) (Monday, 10 March)
• Re: We need to start building a community (Re: Primer updated with a Changes section) (Friday, 7 March)

Norman Walsh

• Re: RDFa test case #1 missing @profile? (Thursday, 6 March)
• Re: RDFa test case #1 missing @profile? (Thursday, 6 March)
• Re: RDFa test case #1 missing @profile? (Monday, 3 March)
• Re: RDFa test case #1 missing @profile? (Monday, 3 March)
• Re: RDFa test case #1 missing @profile? (Monday, 3 March)
• Re: RDFa test case #1 missing @profile? (Monday, 3 March)

Ralph R. Swick

• meeting record: 2008-03-20 RDF-in-XHTML TF telecon (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: new list request [was: We need to start building a community (Re: Primer updated with a Changes section)] (Friday, 14 March)
• meeting record: 2008-03-13 RDF-in-XHTML TF telecon (Thursday, 13 March)
• Re: meeting record: 2008-03-06 RDF-in-XHTML TF telecon (Friday, 7 March)
• meeting record: 2008-03-06 RDF-in-XHTML TF telecon (Thursday, 6 March)

Shane McCarron

• Re: request for extension to review RDFa Last Call. (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: Community outreach with a cheat sheet! (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: Community outreach with a cheat sheet! (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: Serving XHTML as HTML -- still valid for RDFa (Saturday, 22 March)
• Re: Reviewing Last Call RDFa (Friday, 21 March)
• Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed (Friday, 21 March)
• Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: Community outreach (Sunday, 16 March)
• Re: Serving XHTML as HTML -- still valid for RDFa (Friday, 14 March)
• Re: Serving XHTML as HTML -- still valid for RDFa (Friday, 14 March)
• Re: RDF/XML and CURIEs (Monday, 10 March)
• RDF/XML and CURIEs (Monday, 10 March)
• What format must an RDFa extractor service emit? (Sunday, 9 March)
• RDFa Syntax Last Call Comment - Test 58 and Rule 11 (Friday, 7 March)
• Edge Conditions in Processing Rules that might benefit from test cases (Thursday, 6 March)
• Re: discussion and resolution of ISSUE-87 (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Re: quick one: ISSUE-91 (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Regrets for 6 March (Monday, 3 March)
• Re: RDFa test case #1 missing @profile? (Monday, 3 March)
• Re: RDFa test case #1 missing @profile? (Monday, 3 March)
• RDFa Syntax Last Call comment - section 5.4.3 (Monday, 3 March)
• RDFa Syntax Last Call Comment - typo in section 5.4 (Monday, 3 March)
• Re: additional test needed (Monday, 3 March)
• Re: additional test needed (Sunday, 2 March)
• additional test needed (Saturday, 1 March)

Simon J. Hernandez

• ISSUE-1: Test on a closed ISSUE (Wednesday, 12 March)

Simone Onofri

• Re: Progress on the RDFa GRDDL transform (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: Telecon Agenda, Thursday 27 March 2008, 1500 UTC == *EUROPE* still one hour earlier (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: RDFa wiki (Wednesday, 12 March)
• Re: What format must an RDFa extractor service emit? (Sunday, 9 March)
• Re: We need to start building a community (Re: Primer updated with a Changes section) (Saturday, 8 March)
• Re: Agenda for Telecon Thursday, 1600 UTC. (Thursday, 6 March)

Steven Pemberton

• The Self-Describing Web (Wednesday, 19 March)
• Yahoo!, Bibleref, and RDFa (Monday, 17 March)
• Re: RDFa wiki (Thursday, 13 March)
• Re: RDFa wiki (Thursday, 13 March)
• Re: RDFa wiki (Thursday, 13 March)
• Topbraid supports RDFa (Wednesday, 12 March)
• Re: a bit of levity (Thursday, 6 March)
• Re: Call time changes next week (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Re: Call time changes next week (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Call time changes next week (Tuesday, 4 March)

SWD Issue Tracker

• ISSUE-102: Last Call Comment: Better name than \'instanceof\' is needed (Thursday, 20 March)
• ISSUE-101: Last Call Comment: garbage collecting \"useless\" triples doesn\'t seem necessary and could hurt authors as they write RDFa (Thursday, 20 March)
• ISSUE-100: Last Call Comment: Bug in Step 11 of Processing rules, as evidenced by Test Case 58 (Thursday, 20 March)
• ISSUE-99: Last Call Comment: Editorial Bug in @src example mistaken in Section 5.3 (Thursday, 20 March)
• ISSUE-98: URI escaping in SPARQL query in Recipe 6 (Sunday, 16 March)

Sébastien Laborie

• Different results of different RDFa extractors (Thursday, 27 March)

Tim Berners-Lee

• Re: Reviewing Last Call RDFa (Monday, 24 March)
• Reviewing Last Call RDFa (Friday, 21 March)

Last message date: Monday, 31 March 2008 20:25:21 UTC