W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > March 2008

Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed

From: Micah Dubinko <mdubinko@yahoo-inc.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 10:23:45 -0700
Message-ID: <47DFFAA1.7030909@yahoo-inc.com>
To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
CC: John Boyer <boyerj@ca.ibm.com>, public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org

For the record, my comment below is not an official Last Call comment, 
just discussion. It's good to dig into the thinking behind decisions.
I'll clearly label any official comments I send.

Thanks, -m
>
>
> Micah Dubinko wrote:
>>
>> Food for thought...
>>
>> If the instanceof attribute were completely removed from RDFa, would 
>> any use cases be forclosed? Couldn't the same thing be done through 
>> rdf:type properties on possibly blank nodes?
>>
Received on Tuesday, 18 March 2008 17:25:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:01:56 UTC