- From: Micah Dubinko <mdubinko@yahoo-inc.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 14:58:09 -0700
- To: David Peterson <david@squishyfish.com>
- CC: "'Ben Adida'" <ben@adida.net>, public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
What do you all think about the quality of the generated RDFa? I have only a single data point [1] (from the article), and wasn't impressed. -m [1] http://marshallk.com/?overrideUserAgent=true David Peterson wrote: > No, not working for them. Just came across this via the Web. I definitely > think a chat by you would go a long way. > > I agree that it was a bit convoluted and the idea of serving two versions is > *way* off base. > > Good start though... > > Cheers, > > David > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf-request@w3.org [mailto:public-rdf-in- >> xhtml-tf-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Ben Adida >> Sent: Saturday, 22 March 2008 2:46 AM >> To: David Peterson >> Cc: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org >> Subject: Re: New web app to automatically mark up sites with RDFa >> >> >> David Peterson wrote: >> >>> Automatically making your site readable by semantic search engines. A >>> >> web >> >>> service to add RDFa easily to your own site [1]. >>> >> Great news! >> >> I played around with it a bit. It seems like it could be made simpler: >> select fields, then re-output the HTML+RDFa that folks can just copy >> and >> paste into their sites. >> >> No PHP, just static stuff. *That* would be super useful, and there's no >> need to serve different markup for humans and machines. In fact, you >> *want* to serve RDFa to humans, so their browsers can help you make the >> correspondence between what you see on the screen and the data. >> >> Are you working with Dapper on this? If not, do you have a contact >> there >> of someone we can talk to? Dapper folks, if you're lurking, I'm close >> to >> your SF office, I'm happy to drop by :) >> >> -Ben >> > > > >
Received on Friday, 21 March 2008 21:59:18 UTC