Re: test case 0011

Hi Johannes,

Again, referring to specifics, in the context of my broader reply:

> If there were any. As you have to serialize "all nodes that are
>  descendants of the [current element], i.e. not including the element
>  itself", you don't necessarily have one top-level element. In the case
>  of test 0011, you have to serialize a node-list containing
>
>  1. a text node
>  2. an element node
>  3. a text node

That's right. And I'm wondering if we can save ourselves a lot of
messing around if we change "not including the element itself" to
"including the element itself". We'd also need to add a clause that
says "all currently in-scope prefix mappings are added to the apex
node as @xmlns declarations".

(The term 'apex node' comes from Exclusive Canonicalisation [1].)

Regards,

Mark

[1] <http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-exc-c14n/>

-- 
  Mark Birbeck

  mark.birbeck@x-port.net | +44 (0) 20 7689 9232
  http://www.x-port.net | http://internet-apps.blogspot.com

  x-port.net Ltd. is registered in England and Wales, number 03730711
  The registered office is at:

    2nd Floor
    Titchfield House
    69-85 Tabernacle Street
    London
    EC2A 4RR

Received on Wednesday, 5 March 2008 11:29:58 UTC