- From: David Peterson <david@squishyfish.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 09:33:03 +1000
- To: "'Ivan Herman'" <ivan@w3.org>, "'Ben Adida'" <ben@adida.net>
- Cc: "'Manu Sporny'" <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, "'RDFa'" <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
+1 to mixing. Use cases like "linking to your friends", "publishing an event", "publishing your contact information" are great! Just what the needs to be presented to the web 2.0/microformat community. > -----Original Message----- > From: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf-request@w3.org [mailto:public-rdf-in- > xhtml-tf-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Ivan Herman > Sent: Thursday, 13 March 2008 1:24 AM > To: Ben Adida > Cc: Manu Sporny; RDFa > Subject: Re: RDFa wiki > > +10000! *Mixing* vocabularies is certainly one of the areas where RDFa > rocks... > > Ivan > > Ben Adida wrote: > > > > Manu Sporny wrote: > >> While the word 'recipes' is well understood by technical types, the > >> community wiki needs to be accessible by the general public. > > > > Well, but only HTML authors will write RDFa, right? I see "cookbook" > and > > "recipes" a lot, especially when it's about specific use cases. > > > >> The tutorial section should be broken down by Vocabulary > > > > I'm not so sure. We're not microformats, we can mix and match > > vocabularies. In fact, that's a *really* important part of RDFa. So, > > while we can have some vocabulary-specific examples, I question the > idea > > that we should structure the tutorials along hard vocabulary lines. > > > > How about, instead, specific use cases: "linking to your friends", > > "publishing an event", "publishing your contact information", > > "publishing your music." Etc... > > > > Let's get out of the microformat mindset of vocabulary silos :) > > > > -Ben > > > > -- > > Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html > FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Wednesday, 12 March 2008 23:33:20 UTC