Re: super easy issues: ISSUE-93, ISSUE-94, ISSUE-95, ISSUE-96

Ben Adida wrote:
> ==============
> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/93
> 
> In Section 5.5, processing rule 4, it says "If no URI is provided by a
> resource attribute, then..."
> 
> This is a little confusing, since we of course have an attribute named
> "resource".  What is meant is "If no new subject URI is obtained via
> these rules, then..."  I hope, anyway.
> ==============

+1

> ==============
> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/94
> 
> In section 5.5 Sequence, processing rule 13 (really rule 12) it says "a
> value of 'true' should be returned from this level of processing.
> Otherwise a value of false should be returned."
> 
> Two things:
> 
> 1) change false to 'false' or change 'true' to true.

+1 for changing false to 'false'.

> 2) change should to MUST.  This section is normative, and that is a
> conformance requirement.  The use of "should" is polite, but not what is
> intended I think.

+1

> ==============
> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/95
> 
> Section 5.4 paragraph 3 reads:
> "For example, the full URI for Albert Einstein on DPPedia is:"
> 
> It should of course be
> "For example, the full URI for Albert Einstein on DBPedia is:"
> ==============

+1

> ==============
> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/96
> 
> Section 5.4.3 reads (in part):
> 
> There are a number of ways that attributes will make use of CURIEs, and
> they need to be dealt with differently. These are:
> 
>    1. An attribute may be CURIE-only, disallowing other types of values.
>       In this case any value that is not a 'curie' according to the
>       definition in the section CURIE Syntax Definition
>       <http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-syntax/#s_curies> MUST be ignored; this
>       means that not only will there be no error reporting, but also the
>       RDFa processor MUST act as if the value simply did not exist.
>    2. An attribute may allow CURIEs, as well as a full URI. In this case
>       any value that is not surrounded by square brackets, as defined by
>       'safe_curie' in the section CURIE Syntax Definition
>       <http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-syntax/#s_curies>, will be processed as
>       if it was a URI. If the value /is/ surrounded by square brackets,
>       then the inner content must conform to the 'curie' definiton, and
>       as before, if it does not then the value MUST be ignored.

+1

-- manu

-- 
Manu Sporny
President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
blog: RDFa Basics in 8 minutes (video)
http://blog.digitalbazaar.com/2008/01/07/rdfa-basics/

Received on Thursday, 6 March 2008 02:54:01 UTC