Re: We need to start building a community (Re: Primer updated with a Changes section)

On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 10:06 AM, Ben Adida <ben@adida.net> wrote:
>
>  Manu Sporny wrote:
>  > Yes, agreed. Can we get a general community mailing list in the next week?:
>  >
>  > public-rdfa-community@w3.org
>  >
>  > Others that we should consider for the future:
>  >
>  > public-rdfa-developers@w3.org (discuss implementation details)
>  > public-rdf-vocabularies@w3.org (discuss RDF vocabulary best practices)
>
>  I disagree with forking the list any more at this point. We can use the
>  new list for vocabs and users, and use the TF list for developers.
>
>
>  > What is the license that people will be contributing under?
>
>  CC Attribution or Public Domain should be good. Public Domain is likely
>  easier, so we don't have to keep track of attribution. The new CC Public
>  Domain Dedication mechanism will make that even easier.

Note that with the 3.0 licenses (er, maybe even 2.5, not sure off the
top of my head) you can do "group attribution" -- ie, state when users
contribute to your wiki that the work will be attributed as "RDFa
Wiki" (for example); CC does this with our wiki, licensing it under
Attribution 3.0.

>
>
>  >>From a technology standpoint, we should be using a current,
>  > well-supported blogging/wiki platform (such as Wordpress and MediaWiki).
>
>  Agreed, although to be fair I really hate Wordpress now with their awful
>  approach to security and the painful upgrade process. But I have nothing
>  better to suggest.
>
>
>  > rdfa.w3.org/ (main website - simple - eye catching)
>
>  That's not going to happen without a massive approval process :)
>
>  Let's go with rdfa.info/wiki
>
>  I'll get CC to start the MediaWiki installation.
>
>  Ralph: can you start the process for a new mailing list?
>
>  -Ben
>
>

Received on Monday, 10 March 2008 02:31:48 UTC