Re: test case 0011

Actually... the evening shower being the best place for new ideas:-) I 
realized yesterday evening that, at least in my case, I can have a way 
to implement this without too much trouble...

Ivan

Ivan Herman wrote:
> Ouch. That hurts:-)
> 
> Reason: while I can see your argument, if we had to go down that route, 
> it may create problems with implementations. I know I would have to 
> change by throwing out the simple (and default) xml package I use (and 
> that comes with the Python distribution) for a more powerful one (PyXML) 
> because the simple one is not really namespace aware. I am not saying it 
> is impossible, I am just saying this would create an extra load:-(
> 
> But, well, of the greater good, one may have to do that... I am curious 
> to see the TF's reaction...
> 
> Ivan
> 
> Johannes Koch wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> the sparql query for test case 0011 
>> (<http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/xhtml1-testcases/0011.sparql>) 
>> contains the triple
>>
>> <http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/xhtml1-testcases/0011.xhtml> 
>> <http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/title>
>> "E = mc<sup>2</sup>: The Most Urgent Problem of Our Time"^^
>>   <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#XMLLiteral> .
>>
>> In the test file 
>> (<http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/xhtml1-testcases/0011.xhtml>) 
>> the sup element is in the http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml namespace. 
>> Shouldn't this be included somehow in the object literal?
>>
> 

-- 

Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf