W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > March 2008

RE: Community outreach with a cheat sheet!

From: David Peterson <david@squishyfish.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 01:48:49 +1000
To: "'Ben Adida'" <ben@adida.net>
Cc: "'Shane McCarron'" <shane@aptest.com>, "'Ivan Herman'" <ivan@w3.org>, "'W3C RDFa task force'" <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Message-ID: <009301c88e8f$b9172b30$2b458190$@com>

Hello Ben,

That is what was what I had intended. I did not want to re-invent anything, just wanted to highlight a XFN to RDFa mapping. I was giving an example from the XFN microformat [1].

XFN 1.1
- snip -

My example URI (http://rdfa.info/2008/03/xfn#co-worker) probably stank, but that is why I am bringing it up here so I (we) can get started.

The main reason I want to kick this off is for an article I am writing for SitePoint on how microformatters can benefit from RDFa whilst using what is familiar. Yahoo! will only be indexing 5 of the 98 or so and FireFox 3 parses the same 5 I believe. So, when SearchMonkey kicks in there will be a lot of unhappy campers -- that is until we Semantify 'Em!

So maybe XFN wasn't the best example to pick. Yahoo! will extract: hCard, hCalendar, hReview, hAtom, and XFN. What would be a better vocab?



[1] http://gmpg.org/xfn/11

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ben Adida [mailto:ben@adida.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, 26 March 2008 1:25 AM
> To: David Peterson
> Cc: 'Shane McCarron'; 'Ivan Herman'; 'W3C RDFa task force'
> Subject: Re: Community outreach with a cheat sheet!
> David Peterson wrote:
> > http://rdfa.info/2008/03/xfn#co-worker
> I'd prefer if we worked on re-using existing vocabularies rather than
> re-inventing them wholesale :) But, of course, the beauty of RDFa is
> that I have no say :)
> -Ben
Received on Tuesday, 25 March 2008 15:49:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:01:56 UTC