- From: David Peterson <david@squishyfish.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 01:48:49 +1000
- To: "'Ben Adida'" <ben@adida.net>
- Cc: "'Shane McCarron'" <shane@aptest.com>, "'Ivan Herman'" <ivan@w3.org>, "'W3C RDFa task force'" <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Hello Ben, That is what was what I had intended. I did not want to re-invent anything, just wanted to highlight a XFN to RDFa mapping. I was giving an example from the XFN microformat [1]. ----------------- XFN 1.1 rel="contact" rel="acquaintance" rel="friend" rel="met" rel="co-worker" - snip - ----------------- My example URI (http://rdfa.info/2008/03/xfn#co-worker) probably stank, but that is why I am bringing it up here so I (we) can get started. The main reason I want to kick this off is for an article I am writing for SitePoint on how microformatters can benefit from RDFa whilst using what is familiar. Yahoo! will only be indexing 5 of the 98 or so and FireFox 3 parses the same 5 I believe. So, when SearchMonkey kicks in there will be a lot of unhappy campers -- that is until we Semantify 'Em! So maybe XFN wasn't the best example to pick. Yahoo! will extract: hCard, hCalendar, hReview, hAtom, and XFN. What would be a better vocab? Cheers, David [1] http://gmpg.org/xfn/11 > -----Original Message----- > From: Ben Adida [mailto:ben@adida.net] > Sent: Wednesday, 26 March 2008 1:25 AM > To: David Peterson > Cc: 'Shane McCarron'; 'Ivan Herman'; 'W3C RDFa task force' > Subject: Re: Community outreach with a cheat sheet! > > David Peterson wrote: > > http://rdfa.info/2008/03/xfn#co-worker > > I'd prefer if we worked on re-using existing vocabularies rather than > re-inventing them wholesale :) But, of course, the beauty of RDFa is > that I have no say :) > > -Ben
Received on Tuesday, 25 March 2008 15:49:31 UTC