- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2008 09:43:48 +0100
- To: Johannes Koch <koch@w3development.de>
- CC: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
- Message-ID: <47CE5D44.9090805@w3.org>
Regardless of my previous comments on implementability; if we indeed accept this (and, in my purist moments, I tend to agree with Johannes on that one) this may affect our test suite. Indeed, consider the following, slightly more complicated case: <div about=""> <h2 property="dc:title"><span class="bla">E = mc<sup>2</sup>: The Most Urgent Problem of Our Time</span></h2> </div> Then the generated RDF can either be: <> <dc:title> "<span xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" class="bla">E = mc<sup>2</sup>: The Most Urgent Problem of Our Time</span>"^^xsd:XMLLiteral but it could also be: <> <dc:title> "<span xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" class="bla">E = mc<sup xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml>2</sup>: The Most Urgent Problem of Our Time</span>"^^xsd:XMLLiteral which is, from an XML point of view, identical. The problem is that I am simply not sure whether the SPARQL engines compare XML Literals textually or 'semantically', so to say... Ivan Johannes Koch wrote: > > Hi, > > the sparql query for test case 0011 > (<http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/xhtml1-testcases/0011.sparql>) > contains the triple > > <http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/xhtml1-testcases/0011.xhtml> > <http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/title> > "E = mc<sup>2</sup>: The Most Urgent Problem of Our Time"^^ > <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#XMLLiteral> . > > In the test file > (<http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/xhtml1-testcases/0011.xhtml>) > the sup element is in the http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml namespace. > Shouldn't this be included somehow in the object literal? > -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Wednesday, 5 March 2008 08:43:55 UTC