W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > March 2008

quick one: ISSUE-91

From: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 21:04:05 -0800
Message-ID: <47CCD845.60101@adida.net>
To: RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>


http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/91

Read and respond with +1 or -1 and explanation. This one is a quickie.

We have the following language:

======
A. Other XML Languages

"If a language includes @xml:base [XMLBASE], an RDFa parser for that 
host language must process it, and use its value to set [base]."
======

The comment is that we shouldn't state a MUST for anything other than 
XHTML1.1+RDFa.

PROPOSED RESOLUTION: change wording to:

"If an XML dialect that supports @xml:base eventually implements RDFa, 
the RDFa parser for that host language will likely process @xml:base and 
use its value to set [base]."


-Ben
Received on Tuesday, 4 March 2008 05:04:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:01:55 UTC