PROV-AQ document revisions for next working draft
- Re: PROV-AQ document revisions for next working draft
- Re: PROV-AQ document revisions for next working draft
Primer embedded provenance
a question on semantics prov-sem and soundness of constraints (issue-630)
Re: prov-wg Telecon February 28, 2013
PROV-ISSUE-634 (small issues-paul): Small issues to fix in the DC Note [Mapping PROV-O to Dublin Core]
Editors: Update your staged documents
prov-links is staged
prov-wg Telcon Agenda Feb 28, 2012
PROV-ISSUE-633 (Minor Issues): Minor Issues of the PROV-DC document [Mapping PROV-O to Dublin Core]
PROV-ISSUE-632 (PROV-AQ-rename): Should PROV-AQ be renamed [Accessing and Querying Provenance]
review of prov-xml
Fwd: Fwd: [IANA #660606] Request for MIME media type Text/Standards Tree - provenance-notation
PROV-ISSUE-631 (dct:replaces): Remove dct:replaces as direct mapping, add it as a complex mapping [Mapping PROV-O to Dublin Core]
PROV-ISSUE-630 (prov-sem-fpwd-review): PROV-SEM review for FPWD [Formal Semantics]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-630 (prov-sem-fpwd-review): PROV-SEM review for FPWD [Formal Semantics]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-630 (prov-sem-fpwd-review): PROV-SEM review for FPWD [Formal Semantics]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-630 (prov-sem-fpwd-review): PROV-SEM review for FPWD [Formal Semantics]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-630 (prov-sem-fpwd-review): PROV-SEM review for FPWD [Formal Semantics]
Re: request for comments on media types section of PROV-XML
prov-dc
PROV-ISSUE-629 (rephrase-abstract): Rephrase abstract in prov-dc note [Mapping PROV-O to Dublin Core]
Provenance Working Group Teleconference: Minutes of 21 February 2012
Prov-XML mime type application
prov-dictionary
PROV-ISSUE-628 (prov-anchor-inconsistency): Specification of anchor in HTML/RDF vs HTTP is inconsistent [Accessing and Querying Provenance]
provenance links for proposed recommendations
- Re: provenance links for proposed recommendations
- Re: provenance links for proposed recommendations
- Re: provenance links for proposed recommendations
- Re: provenance links for proposed recommendations
suggestion for prov/provenance/prov-dm files
scribe required please
Re: ISSUE-595: Prov-xml subtyping needs to be marked in the document
automating the staging of w3c specifications
question on html rendering
PROV-DC Note ready for internal (final?) review
- RE: PROV-DC Note ready for internal (final?) review
- Re: PROV-DC Note ready for internal (final?) review
- Re: PROV-DC Note ready for internal (final?) review
- Re: PROV-DC Note ready for internal (final?) review
PROV-XML examples in primer
RE: PROV-ISSUE-591: delegation PROV-O example missing activity reference [Primer]
provenance wg weekly teleconference: agenda
response about wasQuotedFrom
prov-wg Updated Implementation report
- Re: prov-wg Updated Implementation report
- Re: prov-wg Updated Implementation report
- Re: prov-wg Updated Implementation report
- Re: prov-wg Updated Implementation report
- Re: prov-wg Updated Implementation report
- Re: prov-wg Updated Implementation report
Some comments on prov-dictionary
prov-dm and new boilerplate for specifications
Adding GRDDL to FAQ
embedding prov metadata in the specs
prov-wg Minutes of the February 7, 2013 Telcon
to editors
Re: Little PROV-O questions
Re: examples with blank nodes in prov-o html document
- Re: examples with blank nodes in prov-o html document
- Re: examples with blank nodes in prov-o html document
- Re: examples with blank nodes in prov-o html document
- Re: examples with blank nodes in prov-o html document
- Re: examples with blank nodes in prov-o html document
- Re: examples with blank nodes in prov-o html document
- Re: examples with blank nodes in prov-o html document
- Re: examples with blank nodes in prov-o html document
- Re: examples with blank nodes in prov-o html document
- Re: examples with blank nodes in prov-o html document
- RE: examples with blank nodes in prov-o html document
- Re: examples with blank nodes in prov-o html document
- Re: examples with blank nodes in prov-o html document
- Re: examples with blank nodes in prov-o html document
- Re: examples with blank nodes in prov-o html document
- Re: examples with blank nodes in prov-o html document
- Re: examples with blank nodes in prov-o html document
Re: question about hadRole in example for qualifiedInfluence
prov-wg schedule going towards PR (please read)
updates to PROV-XML Note
prov-wg Implementation Report Review (Due Fri Feb 15)
- Re: prov-wg Implementation Report Review (Due Fri Feb 15)
- Re: prov-wg Implementation Report Review (Due Fri Feb 15)
- Re: prov-wg Implementation Report Review (Due Fri Feb 15)
- Re: prov-wg Implementation Report Review (Due Fri Feb 15)
- RE: prov-wg Implementation Report Review (Due Fri Feb 15)
Re: The wasQuotedFrom relationship
- Re: The wasQuotedFrom relationship
- Re: The wasQuotedFrom relationship
- Re: The wasQuotedFrom relationship
Re: PROV-ISSUE-627 (URI-specified-or-REST): Should PROV-AQ specify PROV service URI or always use template?
Re: question on constraint 47 (3) - wasAssociatedWith-ordering
Fwd: The wasQuotedFrom relationship
If the editors use respec…
Re: PROV-ISSUE-627 (URI-specified-or-REST): Should PROV-AQ specify PROV service URI or always use template?
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-627 (URI-specified-or-REST): Should PROV-AQ specify PROV service URI or always use template?
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-627 (URI-specified-or-REST): Should PROV-AQ specify PROV service URI or always use template?
Re: PROV-ISSUE-613 (prov-aq-draft-review): Review paq for release as last call working draft [Accessing and Querying Provenance]
Re: prov-aq review for release as working draft (ISSUE-613)
- Re: prov-aq review for release as working draft (ISSUE-613)
- Re: prov-aq review for release as working draft (ISSUE-613)
- Re: prov-aq review for release as working draft (ISSUE-613)
Pattern for the PR request
PROV-ISSUE-627 (URI-specified-or-REST): Should PROV-AQ specify PROV service URI or always use template?
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-627 (URI-specified-or-REST): Should PROV-AQ specify PROV service URI or always use template?
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-627 (URI-specified-or-REST): Should PROV-AQ specify PROV service URI or always use template?
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-627 (URI-specified-or-REST): Should PROV-AQ specify PROV service URI or always use template?
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-627 (URI-specified-or-REST): Should PROV-AQ specify PROV service URI or always use template?
Status of the DC Note
[PROV-AQ] Multiple anchors and provenance-URIs
- Re: [PROV-AQ] Multiple anchors and provenance-URIs
- Re: [PROV-AQ] Multiple anchors and provenance-URIs
PROV-ISSUE-626 (clarify-date-text): The text about the dates is difficult to understand [Mapping PROV-O to Dublin Core]
PROV-ISSUE-625 (fix-images): Fix images of the DC Note [Mapping PROV-O to Dublin Core]
PROV-ISSUE-624 (URI-specified-or-REST): Should PROV-AQ specify PROV service URI or always use template?
prov-wg Telcon Agenda Feb 07, 2012
prov-wg new blog post up
Provenance Working Group Teleconference: Minutes of 31 January 2013
Re: PROV-DICTIONARY internal review for first public working draft (ISSUE-614)
PROV-XML element ordering
- Re: PROV-XML element ordering
Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608)
- Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608)
- Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608)
- Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608)
- Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608)
- Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608)
- Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608)
- Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608)
- Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608)
- Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608)
- Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608)
- Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608)
- Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608)
- Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608)
- Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608)
- Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608)
- Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608)
- Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608)
- Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608)
- Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608)
- Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608)
- Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608)
- Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608)
- Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608)
- Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608)
- Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608)
- Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608)
- Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608)
- Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608)
- Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608)
- Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608)
- Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608)
- Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608)
PROV XML Identifiers - discussion and straw poll
RE: Prov-XML test cases
Re: PROV-ISSUE-618 (pingback-in-prov-aq): Should pingback be described in PROV-AQ? [Accessing and Querying Provenance]
Fwd: Re: PROV-ISSUE-622 (json-ld-service-description): Should PRIV-AQ bless use of JSON-LD for service description? [Accessing and Querying Provenance]
Fwd: Re: PROV-ISSUE-622 (json-ld-service-description): Should PRIV-AQ bless use of JSON-LD for service description? [Accessing and Querying Provenance]
Re: PROV-ISSUE-618 (pingback-in-prov-aq): Should pingback be described in PROV-AQ? [Accessing and Querying Provenance]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-618 (pingback-in-prov-aq): Should pingback be described in PROV-AQ? [Accessing and Querying Provenance]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-618 (pingback-in-prov-aq): Should pingback be described in PROV-AQ? [Accessing and Querying Provenance]