- From: Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 23:43:30 +0000
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
PROV-ISSUE-634 (small issues-paul): Small issues to fix in the DC Note [Mapping PROV-O to Dublin Core] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/634 Raised by: Daniel Garijo On product: Mapping PROV-O to Dublin Core A couple of things to think about for next round: - It seems we should say something about the dct:provenance relation other thatn we don't do a mapping. Can we not map it to bundles or have it point to an entity? I wonder what the relation to prov:has_provenance is? - In section 2.2. point 1) - I would remove the mention of blank nodes - this doesn't seem to add anything - Does "his leads to bloated and not very intuitive data representations." add anything? - In section 2.2 you mention a clean-up phase which has not yet been described. - There's a typo in the acknowledgments "Iniciative" should be "initiative" Clarify: can the complex mappings be used to create dublin core statements from prov? Are they bidirectional?
Received on Wednesday, 27 February 2013 23:43:31 UTC