- From: Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 11:33:40 +0000
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
PROV-ISSUE-632 (PROV-AQ-rename): Should PROV-AQ be renamed [Accessing and Querying Provenance] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/632 Raised by: Graham Klyne On product: Accessing and Querying Provenance This was a question asked of reviewers at the last review round. Most were OK with the current name, but this from Luc: [[ Is the name provenance access and query appropriate for the document? No. Access yes, query very very little, ping back (if too stay in document) not reflected. I would go for "provenance access and services" ]] I think "provenance access and services" is a reasonable title, but this change will make work for other editors. IS IT WORTH THE EFFORT? I also note that the parts of text have been updated to emphasize the querying nature of the services. I am anticipating that Stian's proposed change to the Pingback will make it look far more like an access mechanism.
Received on Tuesday, 26 February 2013 11:33:41 UTC