W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > February 2013

PROV-ISSUE-632 (PROV-AQ-rename): Should PROV-AQ be renamed [Accessing and Querying Provenance]

From: Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 11:33:40 +0000
Message-Id: <E1UAImy-0008Je-K2@tibor.w3.org>
To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
PROV-ISSUE-632 (PROV-AQ-rename): Should PROV-AQ be renamed [Accessing and Querying Provenance]

http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/632

Raised by: Graham Klyne
On product: Accessing and Querying Provenance

This was a question asked of reviewers at the last review round.  Most were OK with the current name, but this from Luc:

[[
Is the name provenance access and query appropriate for the document?

No.  Access yes, query very very little, ping back (if too stay in
document) not reflected.

I would go for "provenance access and services"
]]

I think "provenance access and services" is a reasonable title, but this change will make work for other editors.  IS IT WORTH THE EFFORT?

I also note that the parts of text have been updated to emphasize the querying nature of the services.

I am anticipating that Stian's proposed change to the Pingback will make it look far more like an access mechanism.
Received on Tuesday, 26 February 2013 11:33:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:51:31 UTC