- From: Curt Tilmes <Curt.Tilmes@nasa.gov>
- Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 11:45:50 -0500
- To: Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- CC: Stephan Zednik <zednis@rpi.edu>, W3C provenance WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
On 02/27/2013 03:18 AM, Luc Moreau wrote: > On 27/02/13 07:56, Stephan Zednik wrote: >> The examples from the note should be identical to, or very very >> similar to, the xml examples in >> examples/eg-40-xml-examples-by-terms/xml. All the xml examples in >> eg-40 currently validate using xmllint. You can run make in this >> directory to run the validation tests. > > I don't understand how they validate. For instance, example 23: > line-management example has no prefix, but no default prefix > defined. I now realise prov:ref="a" suffers from the same > problem. This occurs in several examples. Note that we cheated. We validate against an example test XSD instead of directly against prov.xsd: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/file/35385cbbfb9f/examples/eg-40-xml-examples-by-term/xml/ex.xsd Do you suggest changing this approach, this schema, or the examples? Is there anything in ex.xsd you disagree with? Curt
Received on Wednesday, 27 February 2013 16:46:37 UTC