- From: Huynh T.D. <tdh@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 14:28:30 +0000
- To: James Cheney <jcheney@inf.ed.ac.uk>, Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Dear James, I have fixed the constraint test case XML files that did not follow the latest PROV-XML schema. There are two exceptions though: - Some test cases with "DM" suffix: These can fail the schema validation because some required elements are intentionally removed. - Some unification test cases broke a statement into 2-3 separate statements containing only part of the original once. As a result, they fail to validate the schema because some required elements are missing in these part statements. There are only two test cases in this category: unification-delegation-s3-PASS-c23.provx, unification-delegation-s4-PASS-c23.provx. I only fixed those in the constraints sub-folder (i.e. the unit test cases). I'll wait until the conversion tool is update and will generate the test cases for the examples in PROV-DM and PROV-O again. Best wishes, Dong. -- Dr T Dong Huynh Research Fellow Web and Internet Science Research Group Tel: +44 (0) 23 8059 3270 School of Electronics and Computer Science Fax: +44 (0) 23 8059 2783 University of Southampton Eml: tdh@ecs.soton.ac.uk Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK. -----Original Message----- From: James Cheney [mailto:jcheney@inf.ed.ac.uk] Sent: 30 January 2013 20:38 To: Provenance Working Group Subject: Prov-XML test cases Hi, Some of the PROV-XML versions of the test cases (.provx) are not valid with respect to the schema. For example, in unification-usage-s8-PASS-c23.provx, the "time" element in the usage record is in the wrong place. I understand that the test cases / prov-xml exporter may have predated the current version of the schema. Would it be possible to validate them and correct any that are not valid (with respect to the schema)? --James -- The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
Received on Monday, 4 February 2013 14:30:17 UTC