Re: review of prov-xml

On Feb 27, 2013, at 1:18 AM, Luc Moreau <> wrote:

> Hi Stephan,
> On 27/02/13 07:56, Stephan Zednik wrote:
>> The examples from the note should be identical to, or very very similar to, the xml examples in examples/eg-40-xml-examples-by-terms/xml.  All the xml examples in eg-40 currently validate using xmllint.  You can run make in this directory to run the validation tests.
> I don't understand how they validate. For instance, example 23: line-management example has no prefix, but no default prefix defined.
> I now realise prov:ref="a" suffers from the same problem. This occurs in several examples.

I do not at this time know why a QName with only a local part and no defined default namespace currently validates.

Also, did anything with the glossary.js change?  My glossary references no longer appear to work.


> Luc
> -- 
> Professor Luc Moreau
> Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
> University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
> Southampton SO17 1BJ               email:
> United Kingdom           

Received on Wednesday, 27 February 2013 08:45:04 UTC