- From: Stephan Zednik <zednis@rpi.edu>
- Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 01:44:35 -0700
- To: Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Cc: W3C provenance WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
On Feb 27, 2013, at 1:18 AM, Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote: > Hi Stephan, > > On 27/02/13 07:56, Stephan Zednik wrote: >> The examples from the note should be identical to, or very very similar to, the xml examples in examples/eg-40-xml-examples-by-terms/xml. All the xml examples in eg-40 currently validate using xmllint. You can run make in this directory to run the validation tests. > > I don't understand how they validate. For instance, example 23: line-management example has no prefix, but no default prefix defined. > I now realise prov:ref="a" suffers from the same problem. This occurs in several examples. I do not at this time know why a QName with only a local part and no defined default namespace currently validates. Also, did anything with the glossary.js change? My glossary references no longer appear to work. --Stephan > > Luc > > -- > Professor Luc Moreau > Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 > University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 > Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk > United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm > > >
Received on Wednesday, 27 February 2013 08:45:04 UTC