- From: Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 10:05:10 +0000
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
PROV-ISSUE-629 (rephrase-abstract): Rephrase abstract in prov-dc note [Mapping PROV-O to Dublin Core] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/629 Raised by: Daniel Garijo On product: Mapping PROV-O to Dublin Core In the abstract, one sentence doesn't quite make sense: "The direct mappings are broad and usually a more complex mapping can be specified," It is not clear what you mean by "broad", or why this is connected to specifying complex mappings. "Broad" is generally a positive term, while "complex" is a negative one. Intuitively, if the direct mappings are "broad", then this means they apply to many cases, but if so, why would you want to specify complex mappings? Complex mappings can be specified but, given that we want to avoid complexity, why do you need to? It needs to be rephrased.
Received on Monday, 25 February 2013 10:05:11 UTC