- From: Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 09:08:27 +0000
- To: Stephan Zednik <zednis@rpi.edu>
- CC: W3C provenance WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
On 02/27/2013 08:44 AM, Stephan Zednik wrote: > On Feb 27, 2013, at 1:18 AM, Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote: > >> Hi Stephan, >> >> On 27/02/13 07:56, Stephan Zednik wrote: >>> The examples from the note should be identical to, or very very similar to, the xml examples in examples/eg-40-xml-examples-by-terms/xml. All the xml examples in eg-40 currently validate using xmllint. You can run make in this directory to run the validation tests. >> I don't understand how they validate. For instance, example 23: line-management example has no prefix, but no default prefix defined. >> I now realise prov:ref="a" suffers from the same problem. This occurs in several examples. > I do not at this time know why a QName with only a local part and no defined default namespace currently validates. OK, it would be good to check all those QNames, and add a prefix, in this example, ex:, I think. > > Also, did anything with the glossary.js change? My glossary references no longer appear to work. Well, I realised that the latest respec.js broke most references in the published prov-dm CR. I fixed prov-dm, but had to change some of the "title" in glossary, since capitalization conventions of respec.js changed. Luc > > --Stephan > >> Luc >> >> -- >> Professor Luc Moreau >> Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 >> University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 >> Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk >> United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm >> >> >> -- Professor Luc Moreau Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Wednesday, 27 February 2013 09:09:04 UTC