public-prov-wg@w3.org from February 2013 by date

Thursday, 28 February 2013

Re: PROV-AQ document revisions for next working draft Luc Moreau
Re: review of prov-xml Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-AQ document revisions for next working draft Graham Klyne
PROV-AQ document revisions for next working draft Graham Klyne
Re: review of prov-xml Stian Soiland-Reyes
Re: Primer embedded provenance Ivan Herman
Primer embedded provenance Miles, Simon
Re: a question on semantics prov-sem and soundness of constraints (issue-630) James Cheney
Re: a question on semantics prov-sem and soundness of constraints (issue-630) Luc Moreau
Re: a question on semantics prov-sem and soundness of constraints (issue-630) James Cheney
Re: PROV-ISSUE-630 (prov-sem-fpwd-review): PROV-SEM review for FPWD [Formal Semantics] Luc Moreau
a question on semantics prov-sem and soundness of constraints (issue-630) Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-630 (prov-sem-fpwd-review): PROV-SEM review for FPWD [Formal Semantics] James Cheney
Re: PROV-ISSUE-630 (prov-sem-fpwd-review): PROV-SEM review for FPWD [Formal Semantics] Luc Moreau
Re: prov-wg Telecon February 28, 2013 Stephan Zednik
Re: review of prov-xml Stephan Zednik

Wednesday, 27 February 2013

PROV-ISSUE-634 (small issues-paul): Small issues to fix in the DC Note [Mapping PROV-O to Dublin Core] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: PROV-DC Note ready for internal (final?) review Daniel Garijo
Re: review of prov-xml Luc Moreau
Re: review of prov-xml Curt Tilmes
Re: PROV-ISSUE-630 (prov-sem-fpwd-review): PROV-SEM review for FPWD [Formal Semantics] Satya Sahoo
Re: Editors: Update your staged documents Timothy Lebo
RE: The wasQuotedFrom relationship Miles, Simon
Re: PROV-ISSUE-630 (prov-sem-fpwd-review): PROV-SEM review for FPWD [Formal Semantics] Paolo Missier
Re: prov-dictionary Luc Moreau
Re: prov-dictionary Tom De Nies
Re: PROV-ISSUE-630 (prov-sem-fpwd-review): PROV-SEM review for FPWD [Formal Semantics] Khalid Belhajjame
Re: PROV-DC Note ready for internal (final?) review Paul Groth
Re: prov-links is staged Ivan Herman
Re: prov-dictionary Luc Moreau
Re: prov-links is staged Luc Moreau
Re: prov-dictionary Tom De Nies
Re: Editors: Update your staged documents Luc Moreau
Editors: Update your staged documents Paul Groth
prov-links is staged Luc Moreau
prov-wg Telcon Agenda Feb 28, 2012 Paul Groth
Re: review of prov-xml Luc Moreau
Re: review of prov-xml Stephan Zednik
Re: review of prov-xml Stephan Zednik
Re: review of prov-xml Luc Moreau
Re: review of prov-xml Stephan Zednik

Tuesday, 26 February 2013

Re: PROV-DC Note ready for internal (final?) review Luc Moreau
PROV-ISSUE-633 (Minor Issues): Minor Issues of the PROV-DC document [Mapping PROV-O to Dublin Core] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: PROV-DC Note ready for internal (final?) review Daniel Garijo
Re: PROV-DC Note ready for internal (final?) review Luc Moreau
RE: PROV-ISSUE-630 (prov-sem-fpwd-review): PROV-SEM review for FPWD [Formal Semantics] Miles, Simon
Re: review of prov-xml Luc Moreau
PROV-ISSUE-632 (PROV-AQ-rename): Should PROV-AQ be renamed [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
review of prov-xml Luc Moreau

Monday, 25 February 2013

Fwd: Fwd: [IANA #660606] Request for MIME media type Text/Standards Tree - provenance-notation Luc Moreau
PROV-ISSUE-631 (dct:replaces): Remove dct:replaces as direct mapping, add it as a complex mapping [Mapping PROV-O to Dublin Core] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: ISSUE-595: Prov-xml subtyping needs to be marked in the document Stephan Zednik
Re: ISSUE-595: Prov-xml subtyping needs to be marked in the document Stian Soiland-Reyes
Re: ISSUE-595: Prov-xml subtyping needs to be marked in the document Stephan Zednik
Re: prov-wg Updated Implementation report Khalid Belhajjame
Re: PROV-ISSUE-630 (prov-sem-fpwd-review): PROV-SEM review for FPWD [Formal Semantics] James Cheney
PROV-ISSUE-630 (prov-sem-fpwd-review): PROV-SEM review for FPWD [Formal Semantics] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: ISSUE-595: Prov-xml subtyping needs to be marked in the document Paul Groth
Re: prov-wg Updated Implementation report Khalid Belhajjame
Re: prov-wg Updated Implementation report Daniel Garijo
Re: prov-wg Updated Implementation report Khalid Belhajjame
Re: request for comments on media types section of PROV-XML Graham Klyne
prov-dc Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-DC Note ready for internal (final?) review Daniel Garijo
PROV-ISSUE-629 (rephrase-abstract): Rephrase abstract in prov-dc note [Mapping PROV-O to Dublin Core] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: ISSUE-595: Prov-xml subtyping needs to be marked in the document Stian Soiland-Reyes
Re: Provenance Working Group Teleconference: Minutes of 21 February 2012 Luc Moreau
Provenance Working Group Teleconference: Minutes of 21 February 2012 Luc Moreau

Saturday, 23 February 2013

Re: Prov-XML mime type application Stephan Zednik
Re: Prov-XML mime type application Luc Moreau
Re: Prov-XML mime type application Ivan Herman
Re: Prov-XML mime type application Stephan Zednik
Re: provenance links for proposed recommendations Ivan Herman
Re: Prov-XML mime type application Luc Moreau

Friday, 22 February 2013

Re: provenance links for proposed recommendations Graham Klyne

Saturday, 23 February 2013

Re: PROV-DC Note ready for internal (final?) review Paul Groth

Friday, 22 February 2013

Re: Prov-XML mime type application Stephan Zednik
Re: Prov-XML mime type application Ivan Herman
Prov-XML mime type application Luc Moreau
Re: provenance links for proposed recommendations Tim Lebo
RE: PROV-DC Note ready for internal (final?) review Miles, Simon
prov-dictionary Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-DC Note ready for internal (final?) review Daniel Garijo
Re: provenance links for proposed recommendations Ivan Herman
RE: PROV-DC Note ready for internal (final?) review Miles, Simon
Re: provenance links for proposed recommendations Curt Tilmes
Re: provenance links for proposed recommendations Ivan Herman
Re: provenance links for proposed recommendations Graham Klyne

Thursday, 21 February 2013

Re: embedding prov metadata in the specs Timothy Lebo
Re: provenance links for proposed recommendations Ivan Herman
Re: provenance links for proposed recommendations Luc Moreau
Re: provenance links for proposed recommendations Luc Moreau
Re: provenance links for proposed recommendations Curt Tilmes
Re: provenance links for proposed recommendations Graham Klyne
Re: provenance links for proposed recommendations Graham Klyne
Re: provenance links for proposed recommendations Ivan Herman
Re: provenance links for proposed recommendations Timothy Lebo
Re: provenance links for proposed recommendations Ivan Herman
PROV-ISSUE-628 (prov-anchor-inconsistency): Specification of anchor in HTML/RDF vs HTTP is inconsistent [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: provenance links for proposed recommendations Tim Lebo
Re: provenance links for proposed recommendations Paul Groth
provenance links for proposed recommendations Luc Moreau
suggestion for prov/provenance/prov-dm files Timothy Lebo
RE: scribe required please Miles, Simon
scribe required please Luc Moreau
Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608) Stephan Zednik
Re: ISSUE-595: Prov-xml subtyping needs to be marked in the document Stephan Zednik
Re: PROV-XML element ordering Stephan Zednik
Re: Adding GRDDL to FAQ Tim Lebo
Re: Adding GRDDL to FAQ Graham Klyne

Wednesday, 20 February 2013

automating the staging of w3c specifications Luc Moreau
Re: question on html rendering Paul Groth
question on html rendering Luc Moreau
Re: embedding prov metadata in the specs Ivan Herman
Re: embedding prov metadata in the specs Daniel Garijo
PROV-DC Note ready for internal (final?) review Daniel Garijo
Re: The wasQuotedFrom relationship Timothy Lebo
Re: The wasQuotedFrom relationship Stian Soiland-Reyes
Re: The wasQuotedFrom relationship Timothy Lebo
RE: The wasQuotedFrom relationship Stian Soiland-Reyes
RE: The wasQuotedFrom relationship Miles, Simon
RE: The wasQuotedFrom relationship Stian Soiland-Reyes
Re: Some comments on prov-dictionary Timothy Lebo
RE: The wasQuotedFrom relationship Miles, Simon

Tuesday, 19 February 2013

Re: The wasQuotedFrom relationship Stian Soiland-Reyes
Re: prov-dm and new boilerplate for specifications Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-591: delegation PROV-O example missing activity reference [Primer] Stephan Zednik
Re: The wasQuotedFrom relationship Paul Groth
PROV-XML examples in primer Miles, Simon
RE: prov-dm and new boilerplate for specifications Miles, Simon
RE: The wasQuotedFrom relationship Miles, Simon
RE: PROV-ISSUE-591: delegation PROV-O example missing activity reference [Primer] Miles, Simon
provenance wg weekly teleconference: agenda Luc Moreau
Re: prov-wg Updated Implementation report James Cheney
Re: prov-wg Updated Implementation report Luc Moreau
Re: prov-wg Updated Implementation report Luc Moreau
Re: prov-wg Updated Implementation report Paul Groth
Re: prov-wg Updated Implementation report Daniel Garijo
RE: response about wasQuotedFrom Miles, Simon
response about wasQuotedFrom Paul Groth
prov-wg Updated Implementation report Paul Groth
Re: Some comments on prov-dictionary Tom De Nies

Thursday, 14 February 2013

Re: Some comments on prov-dictionary Timothy Lebo
Some comments on prov-dictionary Timothy Lebo
RE: prov-wg Implementation Report Review (Due Fri Feb 15) Miles, Simon
Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608) Stephan Zednik
Re: question on constraint 47 (3) - wasAssociatedWith-ordering James Cheney
Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608) Stephan Zednik
Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608) Stian Soiland-Reyes
Re: Adding GRDDL to FAQ Timothy Lebo
Re: embedding prov metadata in the specs Ivan Herman
Re: embedding prov metadata in the specs Ivan Herman
Re: Adding GRDDL to FAQ Paul Groth
Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608) Stephan Zednik
Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608) Luc Moreau
Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608) Stephan Zednik

Wednesday, 13 February 2013

prov-dm and new boilerplate for specifications Luc Moreau
Re: embedding prov metadata in the specs Ivan Herman
Re: Adding GRDDL to FAQ Timothy Lebo
Re: prov-wg Implementation Report Review (Due Fri Feb 15) Paul Groth
Re: embedding prov metadata in the specs Paul Groth
Re: Adding GRDDL to FAQ Paul Groth
Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608) Stephan Zednik
Adding GRDDL to FAQ Timothy Lebo
Re: examples with blank nodes in prov-o html document Timothy Lebo
Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608) Stephan Zednik

Tuesday, 12 February 2013

Wednesday, 13 February 2013

Re: embedding prov metadata in the specs Ivan Herman
Re: prov-wg Implementation Report Review (Due Fri Feb 15) Ivan Herman
Re: embedding prov metadata in the specs Tim Lebo
Re: embedding prov metadata in the specs Paul Groth
Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608) Stian Soiland-Reyes
embedding prov metadata in the specs Luc Moreau
Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608) Luc Moreau
Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608) Luc Moreau
RE: prov-wg Implementation Report Review (Due Fri Feb 15) Luc Moreau
Re: prov-wg Implementation Report Review (Due Fri Feb 15) Paul Groth
Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608) Stephan Zednik

Tuesday, 12 February 2013

Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608) Stian Soiland-Reyes
Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608) Stephan Zednik
Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608) Luc Moreau
Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608) Luc Moreau
Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608) Stephan Zednik
Re: prov-wg Implementation Report Review (Due Fri Feb 15) Luc Moreau
Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608) Luc Moreau
Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608) Stephan Zednik
Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608) Luc Moreau
Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608) Stephan Zednik
Re: examples with blank nodes in prov-o html document Timothy Lebo
RE: examples with blank nodes in prov-o html document Luc Moreau
Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608) Stephan Zednik
Re: examples with blank nodes in prov-o html document Timothy Lebo
Re: examples with blank nodes in prov-o html document Luc Moreau
RE: Little PROV-O questions Luc Moreau
Re: Little PROV-O questions Paul Groth
Re: Little PROV-O questions Timothy Lebo
Re: examples with blank nodes in prov-o html document Timothy Lebo
prov-wg Minutes of the February 7, 2013 Telcon Paul Groth
Re: Little PROV-O questions Luc Moreau
Re: examples with blank nodes in prov-o html document Luc Moreau
Re: examples with blank nodes in prov-o html document Timothy Lebo
Re: examples with blank nodes in prov-o html document Luc Moreau
Re: examples with blank nodes in prov-o html document Timothy Lebo
Re: examples with blank nodes in prov-o html document Luc Moreau
Re: examples with blank nodes in prov-o html document Timothy Lebo
to editors Luc Moreau
Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608) Stian Soiland-Reyes
Re: Little PROV-O questions Timothy Lebo
Re: examples with blank nodes in prov-o html document Luc Moreau
Re: question about hadRole in example for qualifiedInfluence Luc Moreau
Re: examples with blank nodes in prov-o html document Timothy Lebo
Re: question about hadRole in example for qualifiedInfluence Timothy Lebo
prov-wg schedule going towards PR (please read) Paul Groth
updates to PROV-XML Note Stephan Zednik

Monday, 11 February 2013

Re: prov-wg Implementation Report Review (Due Fri Feb 15) Tom De Nies
prov-wg Implementation Report Review (Due Fri Feb 15) Paul Groth
Re: The wasQuotedFrom relationship Paul Groth
Re: The wasQuotedFrom relationship Paul Groth
Re: The wasQuotedFrom relationship Timothy Lebo
Re: The wasQuotedFrom relationship Stian Soiland-Reyes
Re: PROV-ISSUE-627 (URI-specified-or-REST): Should PROV-AQ specify PROV service URI or always use template? Timothy Lebo
Re: The wasQuotedFrom relationship Timothy Lebo
Re: The wasQuotedFrom relationship Stian Soiland-Reyes

Sunday, 10 February 2013

Re: PROV-ISSUE-627 (URI-specified-or-REST): Should PROV-AQ specify PROV service URI or always use template? Graham Klyne
Re: The wasQuotedFrom relationship Paul Groth
Re: PROV-ISSUE-627 (URI-specified-or-REST): Should PROV-AQ specify PROV service URI or always use template? Paul Groth
Re: The wasQuotedFrom relationship Timothy Lebo
Re: question on constraint 47 (3) - wasAssociatedWith-ordering Paul Groth
Re: The wasQuotedFrom relationship Paul Groth

Friday, 8 February 2013

Re: PROV-ISSUE-627 (URI-specified-or-REST): Should PROV-AQ specify PROV service URI or always use template? Graham Klyne
Re: PROV-ISSUE-627 (URI-specified-or-REST): Should PROV-AQ specify PROV service URI or always use template? Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-627 (URI-specified-or-REST): Should PROV-AQ specify PROV service URI or always use template? Graham Klyne
Re: question on constraint 47 (3) - wasAssociatedWith-ordering James Cheney
Fwd: The wasQuotedFrom relationship Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-627 (URI-specified-or-REST): Should PROV-AQ specify PROV service URI or always use template? Timothy Lebo
Re: prov-aq review for release as working draft (ISSUE-613) Timothy Lebo
If the editors use respec… Ivan Herman
Re: [PROV-AQ] Multiple anchors and provenance-URIs Tom De Nies
Re: prov-aq review for release as working draft (ISSUE-613) Ivan Herman

Thursday, 7 February 2013

Re: PROV-ISSUE-627 (URI-specified-or-REST): Should PROV-AQ specify PROV service URI or always use template? Graham Klyne
Re: PROV-XML element ordering Stephan Zednik
Re: PROV-XML element ordering Stephan Zednik
Re: PROV-XML element ordering Curt Tilmes
Re: PROV-ISSUE-627 (URI-specified-or-REST): Should PROV-AQ specify PROV service URI or always use template? Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-627 (URI-specified-or-REST): Should PROV-AQ specify PROV service URI or always use template? Paul Groth
Re: PROV-ISSUE-627 (URI-specified-or-REST): Should PROV-AQ specify PROV service URI or always use template? Graham Klyne
Re: [PROV-AQ] Multiple anchors and provenance-URIs Graham Klyne
Re: prov-aq review for release as working draft (ISSUE-613) Graham Klyne
Re: prov-aq review for release as working draft (ISSUE-613) Graham Klyne
Re: PROV-ISSUE-613 (prov-aq-draft-review): Review paq for release as last call working draft [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Graham Klyne
Re: prov-aq review for release as working draft (ISSUE-613) Graham Klyne
Re: {Disarmed} Re: PROV-XML element ordering Stephan Zednik
Pattern for the PR request Ivan Herman
Re: Status of the DC Note Daniel Garijo
Re: {Disarmed} Re: PROV-XML element ordering Stephan Zednik
Re: PROV-ISSUE-627 (URI-specified-or-REST): Should PROV-AQ specify PROV service URI or always use template? Timothy Lebo
PROV-ISSUE-627 (URI-specified-or-REST): Should PROV-AQ specify PROV service URI or always use template? Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: [PROV-AQ] Multiple anchors and provenance-URIs Tom De Nies
Status of the DC Note Daniel Garijo
[PROV-AQ] Multiple anchors and provenance-URIs Tom De Nies
PROV-ISSUE-626 (clarify-date-text): The text about the dates is difficult to understand [Mapping PROV-O to Dublin Core] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-625 (fix-images): Fix images of the DC Note [Mapping PROV-O to Dublin Core] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-624 (URI-specified-or-REST): Should PROV-AQ specify PROV service URI or always use template? Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: prov-wg Telcon Agenda Feb 07, 2012 Ivan Herman
Re: prov-wg Telcon Agenda Feb 07, 2012 Graham Klyne
Re: {Disarmed} Re: PROV-XML element ordering Curt Tilmes
Re: prov-wg Telcon Agenda Feb 07, 2012 Tom De Nies
Re: prov-wg Telcon Agenda Feb 07, 2012 Ivan Herman
Re: {Disarmed} Re: PROV-XML element ordering Stephan Zednik
{Disarmed} Re: PROV-XML element ordering Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-XML element ordering Stephan Zednik
Re: PROV-XML element ordering Stephan Zednik

Wednesday, 6 February 2013

Re: PROV-XML element ordering Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-XML element ordering Stephan Zednik
Re: prov-wg Telcon Agenda Feb 07, 2012 Tom De Nies
prov-wg Telcon Agenda Feb 07, 2012 Paul Groth

Tuesday, 5 February 2013

Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608) Stephan Zednik
Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608) Stephan Zednik
Re: PROV-XML element ordering Curt Tilmes
prov-wg new blog post up Paul Groth
Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608) Luc Moreau
Provenance Working Group Teleconference: Minutes of 31 January 2013 Luc Moreau
Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608) Stian Soiland-Reyes
Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608) Luc Moreau
Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608) Stian Soiland-Reyes
Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608) Luc Moreau
Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608) Stian Soiland-Reyes
Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608) Stian Soiland-Reyes
Re: PROV-XML element ordering Curt Tilmes
Re: PROV-DICTIONARY internal review for first public working draft (ISSUE-614) Khalid Belhajjame
Re: PROV-DICTIONARY internal review for first public working draft (ISSUE-614) Tom De Nies
Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608) Luc Moreau
Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608) Stephan Zednik
Re: PROV-XML element ordering Luc Moreau
Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608) Luc Moreau
PROV-XML element ordering Curt Tilmes
Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608) Stephan Zednik
PROV XML Identifiers - discussion and straw poll Stephan Zednik

Monday, 4 February 2013

Re: Prov-XML test cases James Cheney
RE: Prov-XML test cases Huynh T.D.
Re: PROV-ISSUE-620 (json-ld-service-description): Should PRIV-AQ bless use of JSON-LD for service description? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Ivan Herman
Re: PROV-ISSUE-618 (pingback-in-prov-aq): Should pingback be described in PROV-AQ? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Graham Klyne

Sunday, 3 February 2013

Re: PROV-ISSUE-618 (pingback-in-prov-aq): Should pingback be described in PROV-AQ? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Paul Groth

Friday, 1 February 2013

Last message date: Thursday, 28 February 2013 22:20:05 UTC