Re: Adding GRDDL to FAQ

Paul (and Ivan),


On Feb 14, 2013, at 4:56 AM, Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl> wrote:

> The prov:hasProvenance looks right.

Thanks. 
I updated https://github.com/timrdf/provenanceweb/blob/master/src/provx2o.xsl which prov:hasProvenance a link to some prov-o about it.


> 
> We can always update. I don't know the process after the WG ends. But definitely in NS is better than in tr

Can Ivan shed light?

Regards,
Tim


> 
> Paul
> 
> 
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 8:00 PM, Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu> wrote:
> Paul,
> 
> On Feb 13, 2013, at 1:36 PM, Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl> wrote:
> 
>> Oh that's neat.
> 
> Thanks.
> FWIW, you can run that transform and get _something_ out; it's not complete [yet].
> 
> Quick PAQ question: what RDF should I sneak into my comments to point to some random PROV-O document about that script?
> 
> <> prov:hasProvenance <my.ttl> ?
> 
> 
>> I wonder if your suggestion of providing a default translation would be helpful.
> 
> Sure would. I'm hoping that we can do that in the same way that we maintain the actual ontology (in /ns and not /tr).
> Then, we can keep refining it after the WG ends?
> 
> -Tim
> 
>> 
>> Paul
>> 
>> On Feb 13, 2013, at 17:23, Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu> wrote:
>> 
>>> prov-wg,
>>> 
>>> I added a quick note about using GRDDL with PROV-XML at http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/PROV-FAQ#Can_PROV-XML_use_GRDDL.3F
>>> 
>>> Comments and feedback welcome.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Tim
>>> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> --
> Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl)
> http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/
> Assistant Professor
> - Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group | 
>   Artificial Intelligence Section | Department of Computer Science
> - The Network Institute
> VU University Amsterdam