- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 08:44:43 -0500
- To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Cc: "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Luc, On Jan 15, 2013, at 5:51 PM, Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote: > Hi Tim, > > The prov-o document has several examples with blank nodes. > Some of them are difficult > to express in prov-n/prov-xml. > > Consider: > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/file/5495d990f17b/testcases/provo/prov-o-property-hadUsage-PASS.ttl > > The usage has no identifier we can use in the derivation. Any identifier will do; you may choose a new one for each bnode you find. > Should we keep examples of this kind in the specification or should we introduce an explicit > identifier for usage here? We are using blank nodes to help the reader focus on the structure of the PROV-O pattern. I think this is appropriate for the audience of PROV-O. Perhaps it's just a matter of knowing how to handle bnodes when mapping to other serializations? Regards, Tim > > Luc > > -- > Professor Luc Moreau > Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 > University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 > Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk > United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm > > >
Received on Tuesday, 12 February 2013 13:45:08 UTC