- From: James Cheney <jcheney@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 15:54:17 +0000
- To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Cc: pgroth@gmail.com, "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <1DAEA900-DCC1-45D6-B829-1538BD74AF66@inf.ed.ac.uk>
('binary' encoding is not supported, stored as-is)
Hi all, I have added a remark summarizing this discussion just after constraint 47. I propose to close this issue since the remark should address it. Please let me know by Monday if further discussion is needed. --James On Jan 16, 2013, at 10:12 AM, Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote: > Hi Paul, > > OK, we can revise the text. ISSUE-615 created. > > For the typing constraint, constraint 50 applies: > > wasEndedBy(end2; ag,_e2,_a2,_t2,_attrs2) implies 'activity' in type(ag) > likewise, > wasGeneratedBy(gen1; ag,_a1,_t1,_attrs1) implies 'entity' in type(ag) > > Luc > > > > On 01/16/2013 10:02 AM, Paul Groth wrote: >> Hi Luc, >> >> I just figured that out as well. :-) >> >> Thanks. >> >> Two things >> - maybe this should be made clear in the text? by some comments in the rules. >> - I also wonder if there should be a typing constraint in the head of the rule to say that agent must be an agent or an entity for the cases to apply. >> >> Thanks >> Paul >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote: >> Hi Paul, >> >> Constraint 47 is looking at the ordering constraints between >> an activity a and an agent ag, considering >> - ag is an entity (cases 1 and 2) >> - ag is an activity (cases 3 and 4) >> >> Case 3 says that the agent (an activity) must have ended after the start of >> the activity a, ensuring some overlap between the two. >> >> Luc >> >> >> On 01/16/2013 09:44 AM, Paul Groth wrote: >>> Hi All, >>> >>> Can someone clarify the following in the spec (Constraint 47 - 3) >>> >>> IF wasAssociatedWith(_assoc; a,ag,_pl,_attrs) and wasStartedBy(start1; a,_e1,_a1,_t1,_attrs1) and wasEndedBy(end2; ag,_e2,_a2,_t2,_attrs2) THEN start1 precedes end2. >>> >>> >>> From my reading, this is saying that the start of activity a, must happen after the end of activity, a2 if the the agent, ag, ended activity a2. >>> >>> This doesn't make sense to me. An agent can potentially end one activity and start another... >>> >>> Can someone clarify this for me? >>> >>> Thanks >>> Paul >> >> -- >> Professor Luc Moreau >> Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 >> University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 >> Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk >> United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm >> >> > > -- > Professor Luc Moreau > Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 > University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 > Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk > United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm >
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
Received on Friday, 8 February 2013 15:54:45 UTC