Re: question about hadRole in example for qualifiedInfluence

Luc,


On Jan 15, 2013, at 11:09 AM, Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:

> 
> Hi Tim,
> 
> The example has 'hadRole' for an Influence
> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/testcases/provo/prov-o-property-qualifiedInfluence-PASS.ttl
> 
> We already had the debate about the domain of hadRole. Let's not reopen it here.
> 
> Should the example avoid hadRole or alternatively use a subclass of Influence as done in:
> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/testcases/provo/prov-o-class-Influence-PASS.ttl

I updated the qualified Influence example by replacing the hadRole with a domain extension to describe the Influence.

Using a subclass of Influence (as you suggest) does not convey the generality of the superclass, which I think is important to convey in the exemplar for the construct itself.

https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/rev/f6d053f8bfb2

-Tim

> 
> Cheers,
> Luc
> 
> -- 
> Professor Luc Moreau
> Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
> University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
> Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
> United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
> 
> 
>