www-html@w3.org from August 1996 by author

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ]
• Other archives: [ this mailing list ][ other W3C mailing lists ]

• Re: NDN: www-html-d Digest V96 #243 Fri, 2 Aug 1996 23:48:34 -0400
• /S=STT/O=SZMAIL/PRMD=SZPTT/ADMD=CHINAMAIL/C=CN/@x400.sta.net.cn
  • Sorry, please don't send me any Email. Wed, 14 Aug 1996 20:02:31 +0800
• Abigail
  • Re: My Friday-Before-Labor-Day Diatribe [Was: Frame document structure] Fri, 30 Aug 1996 22:03:15 +0100
  • Re: Frames still broke in NSN 3? Wed, 28 Aug 1996 16:52:09 +0100
  • Re: Problems/Question with Cougar Fri, 23 Aug 1996 20:31:46 +0100
  • Re: Frames - does anyone like them? Wed, 21 Aug 1996 20:00:46 +0100
  • Re: Frames - does anyone like them? Wed, 21 Aug 1996 16:45:40 +0100
  • BrowserCaps (was Re: To <P> or not to <P>) Mon, 19 Aug 1996 16:07:16 +0100
  • Re: HTML 3.2 Resources Wed, 14 Aug 1996 14:15:45 +0100
  • Re: Tag Soup. Wed, 14 Aug 1996 10:14:25 +0100
  • Re: Uses of <I> Mon, 05 Aug 1996 13:52:33 +0100
  • Re: Render EM as underline [was: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar] (fwd) Mon, 05 Aug 1996 13:47:07 +0100
  • Re: Render EM as underline [was: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar] Thu, 01 Aug 1996 11:54:47 +0100
• Adam M. Costello
  • Re: &nbsp; Tastes great! Less filling! Fri, 2 Aug 1996 21:57:39 GMT
• afn48623@afn.org
  • mailto:www-html@www0.cern.ch Sat, 17 Aug 1996 12:56:20 -0400
• afn48623@anf.com
  • mailto:www-html@www0.cern.ch Sat, 17 Aug 1996 12:49:33 -0400
• Alan Karben
  • Re: Generic Markup Tue, 13 Aug 1996 15:23:54 -0400
• Alan Thomson
  • history.go(-1) question Fri, 23 Aug 1996 17:53:04 -0700
• Alex Neth
  • Re: What are the problems with IDML? Fri, 16 Aug 1996 18:32:10 -0700
• Allen Miller
  • Re: backgrounds Sat, 31 Aug 1996 15:17:57 -0400
  • Re: backgrounds Fri, 30 Aug 1996 09:47:36 -0400
• Arnoud
  • Re: PROPOSAL FOR A MULTI-COLUMN SELECT ELEMENT WITHIN A FORM FIELD Sat, 31 Aug 1996 20:11:19 +0200
  • Re: Problems/Question with Cougar Sat, 24 Aug 1996 21:15:51 +0200
  • Re: history.go(-1) question Sat, 24 Aug 1996 21:13:53 +0200
  • Re: Problems/Question with Cougar Fri, 23 Aug 1996 20:37:37 +0200
  • Re: Problems/Question with Cougar Fri, 23 Aug 1996 20:40:10 +0200
  • Re: Problems/Question with Cougar Thu, 22 Aug 1996 20:05:00 +0200
  • Re: Background Soundtracks Thu, 22 Aug 1996 20:00:05 +0200
  • Re: Frames - does anyone like them? Thu, 22 Aug 1996 20:03:15 +0200
  • Re: what happened to align=justify? Mon, 19 Aug 1996 19:47:51 +0200
  • Re: what happened to align=justify? Sat, 17 Aug 1996 20:40:52 +0200
  • Re: What are the problems with IDML? Sat, 17 Aug 1996 20:38:07 +0200
  • Re: What are the problems with IDML? (fwd) Fri, 16 Aug 1996 20:19:23 +0200
  • Re: New features in latest HTML 3.2 draft Fri, 16 Aug 1996 20:16:37 +0200
  • Re: New features in latest HTML 3.2 draft Fri, 16 Aug 1996 08:16:21 +0200 (MET DST)
  • New features in latest HTML 3.2 draft Thu, 15 Aug 1996 18:24:43 +0200
  • New HTML 3.2 reference available Wed, 14 Aug 1996 20:53:54 +0200
  • Re: Tag Soup. Wed, 14 Aug 1996 20:07:47 +0200
  • Re: Tag Soup. Wed, 14 Aug 1996 08:52:41 +0200
  • Re: Justification Wed, 14 Aug 1996 08:49:58 +0200
  • Re: What about &nbsp;? Fri, 02 Aug 1996 20:02:51 +0200
  • Re: What about &nbsp;? Fri, 02 Aug 1996 20:01:15 +0200
  • Re: What about &nbsp;? Thu, 01 Aug 1996 20:37:11 +0200
  • Re: What about &nbsp;? Thu, 01 Aug 1996 20:33:08 +0200
  • Re: Render EM as underline [was: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar] (fwd) Thu, 01 Aug 1996 20:31:34 +0200
  • Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply Thu, 01 Aug 1996 20:28:26 +0200
  • Re: Render EM as underline [was: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar] Thu, 01 Aug 1996 12:35:20 +0200
  • Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply Thu, 01 Aug 1996 12:32:44 +0200
• Benjamin Franz
  • Special Characters Thu, 29 Aug 1996 09:41:09 -0500
  • Re: Frames and Documents Thu, 29 Aug 1996 06:41:55 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Frames Are Improving Thu, 22 Aug 1996 09:54:37 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Frames - does anyone like them? Wed, 21 Aug 1996 16:54:17 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Frames - does anyone like them? Wed, 21 Aug 1996 12:49:48 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: W3C and Handle technology Wed, 14 Aug 1996 06:54:05 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Netscape 3.0...A Long Way to Go Mon, 12 Aug 1996 15:39:07 -0700 (PDT)
• Bert Bos
  • Re: Generic Markup Wed, 14 Aug 1996 23:41:45 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: Generic Markup Wed, 14 Aug 1996 22:54:45 +0200 (MET DST)
• Bill Brooks
  • Re: backgrounds Fri, 30 Aug 1996 12:59:09 -0700 (PDT)
• Bill Gianopoulos
  • Re: Netscape 3.0...A Long Way to Go 13 Aug 1996 15:58:55 -0400
• Brent Eades
  • Re: Frames still broke in NSN 3? Thu, 1 Jun 1995 18:12:12 +0000
  • Re: Frames - does anyone like them? Thu, 22 Aug 1996 09:35:13 +0000
  • Re: To <P> or not to <P> Sun, 18 Aug 1996 10:53:29 +0000
  • Re: To <P> or not to <P> Fri, 16 Aug 1996 16:15:41 +0000
• Brent Hennicke
  • Re: Netscape 3.0...A Long Way to Go Mon, 12 Aug 1996 18:27:39 -0500
• Brian Fidel Davila
  • sgml-lex python interface Wed, 7 Aug 1996 12:44:36 +0200 (MET DST)
• Carsten Whimster
  • Proposal: Definition Popup Tag Thu, 1 Aug 1996 15:23:09 -0400 (EDT)
• Cathleen McGuire
  • Re: www-html-d Digest V96 #243 Sat, 3 Aug 96 18:47:34 UT
• Charles Peyton Taylor
  • Tag Soup. Tue, 13 Aug 1996 11:25:52 -0800
  • Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply -Reply Tue, 06 Aug 1996 13:14:10 -0800
• Chris Gray
  • Re: Uses of <I> Tue, 6 Aug 96 21:07:24 GMT
• Chris Josephes
  • Re: Frames and Documents Wed, 28 Aug 1996 23:18:20 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: BGSOUND, no need for it Wed, 28 Aug 1996 07:50:07 -0500 (CDT)
• Chris Lilley
  • Re: BGSOUND, no need for it Wed, 28 Aug 1996 16:56:50 +0200 (DST)
  • Re: BGSOUND, no need for it Wed, 28 Aug 1996 15:21:36 +0200 (DST)
  • Re: Font Embedding Wed, 07 Aug 1996 01:05:46 +0200
• Christian Taube
  • Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply -Reply (fwd) Fri, 9 Aug 1996 12:41:55 +0200 (MET DST)
• Christopher R. Maden
  • Re: Type=File Fri, 30 Aug 1996 21:53:34 GMT
  • Re: How should URL attribute values be parsed? Mon, 26 Aug 1996 14:37:53 GMT
  • Re: What are the problems with IDML? Sat, 17 Aug 1996 00:07:01 GMT
  • Re: Uses of <I> Mon, 5 Aug 1996 21:44:52 GMT
  • Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply Thu, 1 Aug 1996 22:33:08 GMT
  • Re: Render EM as underline [was: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar] Thu, 1 Aug 1996 17:38:12 GMT
• Chuck_Wozniak@quantumdata.com
  • RE> backgrounds Fri, 30 Aug 96 08:26:41 -0800
• Dan Delaney
  • Netscape 3.0...A Long Way to Go Mon, 12 Aug 1996 16:55:11 -0400 (EDT)
• Daniel W. Connolly
  • Re: What are the problems with IDML? Mon, 26 Aug 1996 02:12:52 -0400
  • Re: BGSOUND, no need for it Mon, 26 Aug 1996 01:58:14 -0400
  • Re: What are the problems with IDML? (fwd) Mon, 26 Aug 1996 01:47:44 -0400
  • Re: Background Soundtracks Thu, 22 Aug 1996 20:25:50 -0400
  • Pushpins: patented? [was: Frames - does anyone like them? ] Mon, 19 Aug 1996 22:35:54 -0400
  • Re: New HTML 3.2 reference available Mon, 19 Aug 1996 21:30:28 -0400
  • irc: [was: New URN suggestion ] Sun, 18 Aug 1996 00:39:09 -0400
  • Re: What are the problems with IDML? Sun, 18 Aug 1996 00:20:10 -0400
  • Re: What are the problems with IDML? Sun, 18 Aug 1996 00:07:51 -0400
  • Re: To <P> or not to <P> Sat, 17 Aug 1996 23:50:28 -0400
  • Re: To <P> or not to <P> Sat, 17 Aug 1996 23:41:35 -0400
  • Re: New features in latest HTML 3.2 draft Sat, 17 Aug 1996 23:32:15 -0400
  • Re: HTML 3.2 Resources Sat, 17 Aug 1996 22:57:51 -0400
  • Re: W3C and Handle technology Tue, 13 Aug 1996 13:10:07 -0400
• Dave Raggett
  • Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply -Reply Thu, 08 Aug 1996 13:06:28 -0400
  • Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply -Reply Wed, 07 Aug 1996 18:21:19 -0400
  • Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply -Reply Wed, 07 Aug 1996 14:01:48 -0400
• David Koblas
  • Re: Netscape 3.0...A Long Way to Go Mon, 12 Aug 1996 14:09:29 -0700 (PDT)
• David Perrell
  • Re: My Friday-Before-Labor-Day Diatribe [Was: Frame document structure] Fri, 30 Aug 1996 16:47:39 -0700
  • Re: My Friday-Before-Labor-Day Diatribe [Was: Frame document structure] Fri, 30 Aug 1996 16:34:05 -0700
  • Re: My Friday-Before-Labor-Day Diatribe [Was: Frame document structure] Fri, 30 Aug 1996 13:31:30 -0700
  • Re: My Friday-Before-Labor-Day Diatribe [Was: Frame document structure] Fri, 30 Aug 1996 12:45:44 -0700
  • Re: backgrounds Fri, 30 Aug 1996 09:39:50 -0700
  • backgrounds Thu, 29 Aug 1996 21:35:25 -0700
  • Re: Frames still broke in NSN 3? Wed, 28 Aug 1996 11:31:29 -0700
  • Re: Frames still broke in NSN 3? Wed, 28 Aug 1996 07:29:52 -0700
  • Re: Frames still broke in NSN 3? Wed, 28 Aug 1996 06:34:55 -0700
  • Re: Frames still broke in NSN 3? Mon, 26 Aug 1996 09:46:01 -0700
  • Re: Frames - does anyone like them? Mon, 26 Aug 1996 11:30:27 -0700
  • Re: Frames - does anyone like them? Mon, 26 Aug 1996 12:47:38 -0700
  • Frames still broke in NSN 3? Sun, 25 Aug 1996 13:55:34 -0700
  • Re: Frames - does anyone like them? Sun, 25 Aug 1996 13:33:12 -0700
  • Re: Frames - does anyone like them? Sun, 25 Aug 1996 13:02:03 -0700
  • Re: Frames - does anyone like them? Sat, 24 Aug 1996 18:15:23 -0700
  • Re: Frames - does anyone like them? Sat, 24 Aug 1996 14:23:21 -0700
  • Re: Frames - does anyone like them? Sat, 24 Aug 1996 14:07:22 -0700
  • Re: Frames Are Improving Sat, 24 Aug 1996 13:10:29 -0700
  • Re: Frames - does anyone like them? Sat, 24 Aug 1996 10:22:09 -0700
  • Re: Frames - does anyone like them? Sat, 24 Aug 1996 10:30:17 -0700
  • Re: Background Soundtracks Sat, 24 Aug 1996 10:30:47 -0700
  • Re: Frames - does anyone like them? Wed, 21 Aug 1996 21:21:20 -0700
  • Re: Frames - does anyone like them? Wed, 21 Aug 1996 19:24:40 -0700
  • Re: Frames - does anyone like them? Wed, 21 Aug 1996 18:38:11 -0700
  • Re: Frames - does anyone like them? Wed, 21 Aug 1996 17:23:20 -0700
  • Re: Frames - does anyone like them? Tue, 20 Aug 1996 15:02:23 -0700
  • Re: Suggestion for FRAME code extension Fri, 16 Aug 1996 19:04:20 -0700
  • Re: Shadows. Tue, 6 Aug 1996 13:44:13 -0700
  • Re: What about &nbsp;? Fri, 2 Aug 1996 15:40:53 -0700
  • Re: &nbsp; Tastes great! Less filling! Fri, 2 Aug 1996 15:37:06 -0700
• David Seibert
  • Re: Frames and Documents Thu, 29 Aug 1996 09:42:07 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Frames - does anyone like them? Thu, 22 Aug 1996 17:18:15 -0700 (PDT)
• Derek Harding
  • Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply -Reply Thu, 15 Aug 1996 18:51:38 -0700
• Doug Donohoe
  • Re: What are the problems with IDML? (fwd) Fri, 23 Aug 1996 09:32:54 +0800
  • Re: What are the problems with IDML? (fwd) Fri, 23 Aug 1996 09:25:38 +0800
  • Re: What are the problems with IDML? (fwd) Thu, 22 Aug 1996 10:37:13 +0800
  • Re: What are the problems with IDML? Tue, 20 Aug 1996 16:27:05 +0800
  • Re: What are the problems with IDML? Fri, 16 Aug 1996 17:57:13 +0800
  • Re: What are the problems with IDML? Fri, 16 Aug 1996 16:04:09 +0800
• Earl Hood
  • Re: My Friday-Before-Labor-Day Diatribe [Was: Frame document structure] Sat, 31 Aug 1996 17:45:58 -0500
  • Re: HTML Frames (enhancement request and SGML declarations) Fri, 30 Aug 1996 14:04:17 -0500
  • HTML Frames (enhancement request and SGML declarations) Wed, 28 Aug 1996 11:31:43 -0500
• Erez Levin
  • Type=File Wed, 28 Aug 1996 15:50:06 +0200
• Erik Aronesty
  • Re: Images in Horizontal rules...... Fri, 9 Aug 1996 08:42:20 -0700
  • frames Fri, 9 Aug 1996 08:39:42 -0700
  • i know this is absolutely the wrong forum for this but... Fri, 2 Aug 1996 07:14:47 -0700
• F. E. Potts
  • Re: backgrounds Fri, 30 Aug 1996 19:08:40 -0600
  • Re: backgrounds Fri, 30 Aug 1996 18:24:24 -0600
  • Re: Frames - does anyone like them? Tue, 27 Aug 1996 12:16:19 -0600
  • Re: Frames - does anyone like them? Sun, 25 Aug 1996 19:23:35 -0600
  • Re: Frames Are Improving Sat, 24 Aug 1996 20:14:35 -0600
  • Re: Frames Are Improving Sat, 24 Aug 1996 14:23:06 -0600
  • Re: Frames - does anyone like them? Sat, 24 Aug 1996 14:06:56 -0600
  • Re: Frames - does anyone like them? Sat, 24 Aug 1996 13:28:11 -0600
  • Re: Frames Are Improving Sat, 24 Aug 1996 12:34:00 -0600
  • Re: Frames Are Improving Fri, 23 Aug 1996 19:16:03 -0600
  • Re: Frames - does anyone like them? Wed, 21 Aug 1996 14:36:30 -0600
  • Re: Frames - does anyone like them? Tue, 20 Aug 1996 23:11:06 -0600
• Fernando Fernandez
  • Re: Background Soundtracks Fri, 23 Aug 1996 15:11:00 +0000
• Fisher Mark
  • Re: Frames - does anyone like them? Thu, 22 Aug 96 11:05:00 PDT
  • Re: What are the problems with IDML? Thu, 22 Aug 96 08:11:00 PDT
  • Re: Frames - does anyone like them? Thu, 22 Aug 96 07:42:00 PDT
  • Re: Generic Markup Thu, 15 Aug 96 12:39:00 PDT
  • Re: Generic Markup Thu, 15 Aug 96 12:35:00 PDT
  • Re: W3C and Handle technology Thu, 15 Aug 96 12:51:00 PDT
  • Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply -Reply Thu, 08 Aug 96 09:15:00 PDT
  • Re: Uses of <I> Tue, 06 Aug 96 08:52:00 PDT
• Foteos Macrides
  • Re: BGSOUND, no need for it Mon, 26 Aug 1996 13:53:46 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: AREA tags Tue, 06 Aug 1996 19:29:47 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: AREA tags Tue, 06 Aug 1996 17:57:34 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Proposal: Definition Popup Tag Thu, 01 Aug 1996 16:40:15 -0500 (EST)
• Gail Gurman
  • Suggestion for FRAME code extension Fri, 16 Aug 1996 16:55:41 -0700
• Gaspode
  • SGML and DTDs Fri, 23 Aug 1996 18:40:21 +0000
• Gateway
  • NDN: www-html-d Digest V96 #245 05 Aug 1996 23:18:26 GMT
  • NDN: www-html-d Digest V96 #244 05 Aug 1996 23:17:37 GMT
  • NDN: www-html-d Digest V96 #243 03 Aug 1996 04:30:17 GMT
  • NDN: www-html-d Digest V96 #242 01 Aug 1996 23:31:26 GMT
  • NDN: www-html-d Digest V96 #241 01 Aug 1996 15:23:30 GMT
• Gavin Nicol
  • Re: Frames - does anyone like them? Thu, 22 Aug 1996 16:01:10 GMT
  • Re: Generic Markup Wed, 14 Aug 1996 01:12:03 GMT
  • Re: Generic Markup Tue, 13 Aug 1996 00:22:51 GMT
  • Re: Generic Markup Sun, 11 Aug 1996 17:00:40 GMT
  • Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar] Sun, 11 Aug 1996 12:29:13 GMT
  • Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar] Sun, 11 Aug 1996 12:24:52 GMT
  • Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar] Sun, 11 Aug 1996 03:47:43 GMT
  • Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar] Sat, 10 Aug 1996 13:37:50 GMT
  • Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar] Sat, 10 Aug 1996 00:53:37 GMT
  • Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar] Fri, 9 Aug 1996 22:20:05 GMT
  • Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar] Fri, 9 Aug 1996 19:06:44 GMT
  • Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar] Thu, 8 Aug 1996 16:44:59 GMT
  • Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply -Reply Thu, 8 Aug 1996 16:02:39 GMT
  • Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply -Reply Thu, 8 Aug 1996 13:25:29 GMT
  • Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply -Reply Thu, 8 Aug 1996 02:23:45 GMT
• Gordon Joly
  • Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply -Reply (fwd) Fri, 09 Aug 1996 22:59:47 +0100
• Greg A. Smith
  • Re: PROPOSAL FOR A MULTI-COLUMN SELECT ELEMENT WITHIN A FORM FIELD-Reply Fri, 30 Aug 1996 18:11:41 -0600
  • Re: backgrounds Fri, 30 Aug 1996 14:21:19 -0600
  • PROPOSAL FOR A MULTI-COLUMN SELECT ELEMENT WITHIN A FORM FIELD Fri, 30 Aug 1996 10:50:38 -0600
• Gregory Marr
  • Re: New features in latest HTML 3.2 draft Fri, 16 Aug 1996 14:24:33 -0400 (EDT)
• Hakon Lie
  • Re: Problems/Question with Cougar Tue, 27 Aug 1996 02:01:16 +0200
  • Re: Shadows. Tue, 6 Aug 1996 15:08:25 +0200
• Hitesh Kumar Seth
  • Try: Please Ignore Mon, 5 Aug 1996 11:46:01 -50055 (GMT)
• Ian Graham
  • Re: My Friday-Before-Labor-Day Diatribe [Was: Frame document structure] Fri, 30 Aug 1996 13:46:56 -0400 (EDT)
  • HTML dtd utilities Fri, 30 Aug 1996 11:07:51 -0400 (EDT)
  • HTML 3.2 -- INPUT inside BODY? Tue, 27 Aug 1996 22:15:54 -0400 (EDT)
• Imagination's End
  • Re: Problems/Question with Cougar Fri, 23 Aug 1996 16:15:42 -0600
  • BGSOUND, no need for it Fri, 23 Aug 1996 14:03:17 -0600
  • Proposition for tag <JUNK> Fri, 23 Aug 1996 08:30:54 -0600
  • Re: Problems/Question with Cougar Fri, 23 Aug 1996 08:30:54 -0600
  • Frames, my opinion Thu, 22 Aug 1996 08:16:56 -0600
  • Problems/Question with Cougar Wed, 21 Aug 1996 19:56:32 -0600
  • Question on TABLE's with THEAD/TBODY/TFOOT Tue, 20 Aug 1996 16:22:49 -0600
• Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
  • I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-html-i18n-05.txt Fri, 16 Aug 1996 09:38:34 -0400
• J. Brian Lindauer
  • Justification Mon, 12 Aug 1996 16:20:05 -0500
• James Aylett
  • Re: AREA tags Tue, 6 Aug 1996 23:50:25 +0100 (BST)
  • AREA tags Tue, 6 Aug 1996 22:22:32 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: Render EM as underline [was: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar] (fwd) Thu, 1 Aug 1996 15:14:20 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: What about &nbsp;? Thu, 1 Aug 1996 14:56:54 +0100 (BST)
• James R Falla
  • Re: backgrounds Fri, 30 Aug 1996 16:43:38 -0400 (EDT)
• Jason O'Brien
  • Re: BGSOUND, no need for it Fri, 23 Aug 96 16:23:00 CDT
  • Re: Frames Are Improving Fri, 23 Aug 96 15:20:00 CDT
  • Re: Background Soundtracks Fri, 23 Aug 96 09:40:00 CDT
  • Frames Are Improving Thu, 22 Aug 96 10:04:00 CDT
  • Background Soundtracks Thu, 22 Aug 96 09:04:00 CDT
• Jay Bazuzi
  • Re: backgrounds Fri, 30 Aug 1996 12:39:19 -0700
• Jeff Leane
  • Why IDML exists (was: What are the problems with IDML?) Mon, 26 Aug 1996 11:24:25 -0700
• Jeffrey Veen
  • Re: Frames - does anyone like them? Wed, 21 Aug 1996 16:12:17 -0700
• Jim Taylor
  • PROPOSAL FOR A MULTI-COLUMN SELECT ELEMENT WITHIN A FORM FIELD Fri, 30 Aug 1996 15:16:46 -0800
  • Re: What are the problems with IDML? Fri, 23 Aug 1996 21:07:37 -0800
• John Bro, InterSoft Solutions, Inc
  • Re: Frames - does anyone like them? Sat, 24 Aug 1996 16:59:47 -0400
  • Re: Frames - does anyone like them? Wed, 21 Aug 1996 14:02:54 -0400
• Jon Bosak
  • Re: Generic Markup Mon, 12 Aug 1996 16:12:03 -0700
  • Re: Generic Markup Sun, 11 Aug 1996 11:18:01 -0700
  • Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar] Sun, 11 Aug 1996 10:52:29 -0700
  • Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar] Sat, 10 Aug 1996 23:50:59 -0700
  • Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar] Sat, 10 Aug 1996 11:53:52 -0700
  • Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply -Reply Tue, 6 Aug 1996 21:03:16 -0700
• Jonathan L Neuenschwander
  • Re: Problems/Question with Cougar Fri, 23 Aug 1996 13:58:14 -0500 (EST)
• Jonathan Rosenne
  • Re: What are the problems with IDML? 20 Aug 96 20:35:50 EDT
  • Re: To <P> or not to <P> 17 Aug 96 02:49:00 EDT
  • Re: What about &nbsp;? 01 Aug 96 06:31:28 EDT
• Ka-Ping Yee
  • Re: What are the problems with IDML? Mon, 19 Aug 1996 23:40:53 +0900
  • Re: What are the problems with IDML? Sat, 17 Aug 1996 15:56:14 +0900
  • Re: Netscape 3.0...A Long Way to Go Tue, 13 Aug 1996 11:11:13 +0900
  • "World-Wide" Web Tue, 13 Aug 1996 11:10:27 +0900
  • Re: Render EM as underline [was: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar] Thu, 01 Aug 1996 20:44:04 +0900
• Kay Martha Quittan
  • HTML 3.2 Resources Wed, 14 Aug 1996 14:50:20 +0200
• Kee Hinckley
  • Re: Wild prediction Tue, 27 Aug 1996 11:33:12 -0400
• Keith Calvert Ivey
  • Re: Uses of <I> Mon, 5 Aug 1996 23:03:10 -0500
  • Uses of <I> Fri, 2 Aug 1996 21:43:46 -0500
• Keith M. Corbett
  • Re: What are the problems with IDML? Mon, 19 Aug 1996 10:19:45 -0400
  • Re: What are the problems with IDML? Sat, 17 Aug 1996 00:23:36 -0400
  • Re: Generic Markup Wed, 14 Aug 1996 15:42:31 -0400
  • Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar] Fri, 09 Aug 1996 18:06:13 -0400
• Ken Dow
  • SiteMill code (Was: Re: To <P> or not to <P> (fwd)) Wed, 21 Aug 1996 09:11:49 +0000
• Larry Masinter
  • Re: irc: [was: New URN suggestion ] Sun, 18 Aug 1996 21:26:04 PDT
• Lee Daniel Crocker
  • Refocusing on HTML Sat, 31 Aug 1996 14:51:09 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Frames - does anyone like them? Thu, 22 Aug 1996 13:49:24 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: To <P> or not to <P> Fri, 16 Aug 1996 10:46:45 -0700 (PDT)
  • A bit of unintentional levity 12 Aug 96 19:07:18 GMT
  • Re: Images in Horizontal rules Fri, 9 Aug 1996 10:22:21 -0700 (PDT)
  • &nbsp; Tastes great! Less filling! Fri, 2 Aug 1996 14:05:40 -0700 (PDT)
• levitte@lp.se
  • Re: What are the problems with IDML? Sat, 17 Aug 1996 15:18:13 +0200
• Mandar Mirashi
  • Re: irc: [was: New URN suggestion ] Sun, 18 Aug 1996 01:45:47 -0500 (CDT)
  • New URN suggestion Sat, 17 Aug 1996 04:05:04 -0400
• Marc Salomon
  • Re: What are the problems with IDML? (fwd) Fri, 23 Aug 1996 11:41:49 -0700
  • Re: Frames Are Improving Fri, 23 Aug 1996 11:04:39 -0700
  • Re: Frames Are Improving Thu, 22 Aug 1996 14:02:04 -0700
  • Re: Frames - does anyone like them? Thu, 22 Aug 1996 13:58:36 -0700
  • Re: What are the problems with IDML? Fri, 16 Aug 1996 16:34:37 -0700
  • Re: What are the problems with IDML? Fri, 16 Aug 1996 12:09:44 -0700
  • Re: Generic Markup Wed, 14 Aug 1996 11:33:35 -0700
  • Re: Generic Markup Mon, 12 Aug 1996 11:29:07 -0700
  • Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar] Mon, 12 Aug 1996 10:59:03 -0700
  • Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar] Mon, 12 Aug 1996 10:52:25 -0700
  • Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar] Fri, 9 Aug 1996 16:35:32 -0700
  • Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar] Thu, 8 Aug 1996 15:49:16 -0700
  • Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply -Reply Wed, 7 Aug 1996 14:02:24 -0700
• marc@ckm.ucsf.edu
  • Re: Frames - does anyone like them? Thu, 22 Aug 1996 07:51:57 -0700
  • Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar] Thu, 8 Aug 1996 08:31:53 -0700
  • Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply -Reply Thu, 8 Aug 1996 08:10:01 -0700
  • Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar] Wed, 7 Aug 1996 22:21:59 -0700
  • Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply -Reply Wed, 7 Aug 1996 21:47:53 -0700
• Marcus E. Hennecke
  • Re: Question on TABLE's with THEAD/TBODY/TFOOT Tue, 20 Aug 1996 16:13:03 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: To <P> or not to <P> Fri, 16 Aug 1996 10:39:01 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Netscape 3.0...A Long Way to Go Mon, 12 Aug 1996 15:55:18 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Font Embedding Mon, 5 Aug 1996 17:22:36 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Proposal: Definition Popup Tag Thu, 1 Aug 1996 12:39:30 -0700 (PDT)
• Mark Feldman
  • what happened to align=justify? Fri, 16 Aug 1996 17:17:15 -0700
• Martin Hamilton
  • Re: W3C and Handle technology Wed, 14 Aug 1996 05:12:11 +0100
• Mary Morris
  • Re: backgrounds Fri, 30 Aug 1996 18:14:39 -0700
  • Re: Frames - does anyone like them? Thu, 22 Aug 1996 14:54:01 -0700
  • Re: What are the problems with IDML? Fri, 16 Aug 1996 12:47:33 -0700
  • What are the problems with IDML? Thu, 15 Aug 1996 19:33:51 -0700
  • Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply -Reply Tue, 6 Aug 1996 17:01:47 -0700
• Matt Heffron
  • Has anyone constructed DTDs for MS IE 3.0 and/or latest Netscape?? Fri, 30 Aug 1996 15:37:09 -0700
  • Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply Thu, 01 Aug 1996 14:28:08 -0700
• Matthew David
  • Re: Render EM as underline [was: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar] (fwd) Thu, 1 Aug 1996 12:04:40 -0500
• Matthew James Marnell
  • Re: HTML 3.2 -- INPUT inside BODY? Tue, 27 Aug 1996 22:45:09 -0400
  • Re: What are the problems with IDML? (fwd) Tue, 27 Aug 1996 12:41:22 -0400
  • Re: What are the problems with IDML? (fwd) Mon, 26 Aug 1996 11:45:23 -0400
  • onMouseOver in Cougar. Mon, 26 Aug 1996 10:24:38 -0400
  • Re: What are the problems with IDML? (fwd) Mon, 26 Aug 1996 09:47:50 -0400
  • Re: Frames Are Improving Fri, 23 Aug 1996 15:53:53 -0400
  • Re: Amaya, a new Web browser/editor released by W3C Fri, 23 Aug 1996 15:18:35 -0400
  • Re: Frames Are Improving Thu, 22 Aug 1996 17:49:11 -0400
  • Re: To <P> or not to <P> (fwd) Tue, 20 Aug 1996 18:57:29 -0400
  • Re: What are the problems with IDML? Fri, 16 Aug 1996 12:40:22 -0400
  • Re: Netscape 3.0...A Long Way to Go Thu, 15 Aug 1996 17:18:05 -0400
• MegaZone
  • W3C's importance was Re: onMouseOver in Cougar. (fwd) Tue, 27 Aug 1996 13:18:07 -0700 (PDT)
  • onMouseOver in Cougar. (fwd) Tue, 27 Aug 1996 08:49:39 -0700 (PDT)
  • BGSOUND, no need for it (fwd) Fri, 23 Aug 1996 19:19:48 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Background Soundtracks (fwd) Fri, 23 Aug 1996 19:14:19 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: What are the problems with IDML? (fwd) Fri, 23 Aug 1996 18:19:04 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: What are the problems with IDML? (fwd) Fri, 23 Aug 1996 17:21:29 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: What are the problems with IDML? (fwd) Thu, 22 Aug 1996 16:02:18 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: What are the problems with IDML? (fwd) Thu, 22 Aug 1996 06:54:48 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: To <P> or not to <P> (fwd) Tue, 20 Aug 1996 16:17:53 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: what happened to align=justify? (fwd) Tue, 20 Aug 1996 10:44:14 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: PUT method (fwd) Mon, 19 Aug 1996 19:51:26 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: What are the problems with IDML? (fwd) Mon, 19 Aug 1996 16:45:58 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: To <P> or not to <P> (fwd) Mon, 19 Aug 1996 14:49:51 -0700 (PDT)
  • what happened to align=justify? (fwd) Mon, 19 Aug 1996 14:36:46 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: What are the problems with IDML? (fwd) Mon, 19 Aug 1996 14:32:43 -0700 (PDT)
  • To <P> or not to <P> (fwd) Mon, 19 Aug 1996 14:30:15 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: What are the problems with IDML? (fwd) Mon, 19 Aug 1996 14:26:18 -0700 (PDT)
  • What are the problems with IDML? (fwd) Thu, 15 Aug 1996 20:10:52 -0700 (PDT)
  • What are the problems with IDML? (fwd) Thu, 15 Aug 1996 19:50:26 -0700 (PDT)
  • New features in latest HTML 3.2 draft (fwd) Thu, 15 Aug 1996 19:02:53 -0700 (PDT)
  • HTML 3.2 Resources (fwd) Wed, 14 Aug 1996 06:21:32 -0700 (PDT)
  • 3.2 DOCTYPE Changed... Wed, 14 Aug 1996 02:38:47 -0700 (PDT)
  • frames (fwd) Sat, 10 Aug 1996 03:34:07 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply -Reply (fwd) Fri, 9 Aug 1996 00:45:49 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Render EM as underline [was: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar] (fwd) Fri, 2 Aug 1996 21:16:37 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Render EM as underline [was: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar] (fwd) Fri, 2 Aug 1996 15:51:40 -0700 (PDT)
• Michael Seaton
  • Netscape and SGML Fri, 2 Aug 1996 11:47:27 -0400 ()
• Mick Shadduck
  • Re: backgrounds Sat, 31 Aug 1996 14:15:37 -0700
• Mike Meyer
  • FILE: as FORM ACTION attribute value? Fri, 9 Aug 1996 11:01:24 PST
• Mike Wexler
  • Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply -Reply Wed, 07 Aug 1996 11:21:38 PDT
  • Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply -Reply Tue, 06 Aug 1996 16:15:09 PDT
• Murray Altheim
  • Re: My Friday-Before-Labor-Day Diatribe [Was: Frame document structure] Fri, 30 Aug 1996 17:43:50 -0500
  • My Friday-Before-Labor-Day Diatribe [Was: Frame document structure] Fri, 30 Aug 1996 11:08:32 -0500
  • Re: Problems/Question with Cougar Sat, 24 Aug 1996 17:16:28 -0500
  • Re: What are the problems with IDML? (fwd) Fri, 23 Aug 1996 14:11:14 -0500
  • Re: Frames Are Improving Thu, 22 Aug 1996 17:42:49 -0500
  • Re: Frames Are Improving Thu, 22 Aug 1996 14:42:59 -0500
  • Re: What are the problems with IDML? (fwd) Thu, 22 Aug 1996 11:38:53 -0500
• Obrecht, Richard
  • Anybody know of a good HTML reference? Mon, 19 Aug 96 15:20:00 M
• P. T. Withington
  • pst: URL [Was: Suggestion] Fri, 30 Aug 96 10:48:11 -0400
  • Suggestion Thu, 29 Aug 96 14:05:50 -0400
• Paul Derbyshire
  • hey 1 Aug 1996 09:38:49 GMT
• Paul Jones
  • Re: My Friday-Before-Labor-Day Diatribe [Was: Frame document structure] Fri, 30 Aug 1996 16:37:50 -0500 (CDT)
• Paul Prescod
  • Re: Frame document structure Thu, 29 Aug 1996 02:29:09 -0400
  • Re: Frames and Documents Thu, 29 Aug 1996 02:18:16 -0400
  • Re: Frame document structure Wed, 28 Aug 1996 20:08:42 -0400
  • Wild prediction Mon, 26 Aug 1996 16:19:44 -0400
  • Re: What are the problems with IDML? (fwd) Mon, 26 Aug 1996 15:03:26 -0400
  • Re: Frames Are Improving Sat, 24 Aug 1996 23:14:52 -0400
  • Re: Frames Are Improving Sat, 24 Aug 1996 18:45:57 -0400
  • Re: Frames Are Improving Sat, 24 Aug 1996 16:01:25 -0400
  • Re: BGSOUND, no need for it Sat, 24 Aug 1996 06:24:02 -0400
  • Re: Frames Are Improving Fri, 23 Aug 1996 08:30:17 -0400
  • Re: Frames - does anyone like them? Thu, 22 Aug 1996 10:33:59 -0400
  • Re: Frames - does anyone like them? Wed, 21 Aug 1996 17:06:09 -0400
  • Re: Web Futures (was: HTML Futures (was: to <P>...)) Sun, 18 Aug 1996 18:52:41 -0400
  • HTML, SGML and Tag Minimization (was: </P>) Sun, 18 Aug 1996 12:53:47 -0400
  • HTML Futures (was: to <P>...) Sun, 18 Aug 1996 12:53:51 -0400
  • Re: To <P> or not to <P> Sun, 18 Aug 1996 12:53:44 -0400
  • Re: User-definable scheme types Sat, 17 Aug 1996 11:00:22 -0400
  • Re: New features in latest HTML 3.2 draft Fri, 16 Aug 1996 08:17:58 -0400
  • Re: Tag Soup. Wed, 14 Aug 1996 11:43:04 -0400
  • Re: W3C and Handle technology Tue, 13 Aug 1996 19:00:44 -0400
  • Re: W3C and Handle technology Tue, 13 Aug 1996 10:45:21 -0400
  • Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar] Mon, 12 Aug 1996 17:30:09 -0400
  • Re: Generic Markup Sun, 11 Aug 1996 11:45:02 -0400
  • Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar] Sun, 11 Aug 1996 02:59:58 -0400
  • Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar] Sat, 10 Aug 1996 12:57:13 -0400
  • Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar] Sat, 10 Aug 1996 09:24:23 -0400
  • Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar] Sat, 10 Aug 1996 09:24:26 -0400
  • Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar] Sat, 10 Aug 1996 09:24:15 -0400
  • Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar] Thu, 8 Aug 1996 09:33:40 -0400
  • Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply -Reply Wed, 07 Aug 1996 20:22:35 -0400
  • Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply -Reply Tue, 6 Aug 1996 20:31:52 -0400
  • Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply Thu, 01 Aug 1996 17:27:14 -0400
  • Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply Thu, 01 Aug 1996 09:46:13 -0400
  • Re: Render EM as underline [was: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Thu, 01 Aug 1996 09:44:12 -0400
• Philipp Hoschka
  • RTMW '96 - Call for participation Thu, 22 Aug 1996 18:20:16 +0200
• Philipp Hoschka
  • Re: W3C and Handle technology 21 Aug 1996 18:45:32 GMT
• Rick
  • Re: backgrounds Fri, 30 Aug 1996 21:49:39 -0400
• Scott E. Preece
  • Re: My Friday-Before-Labor-Day Diatribe [Was: Frame document structure] Fri, 30 Aug 1996 17:16:38 -0500
  • Re: BGSOUND, no need for it Wed, 28 Aug 1996 08:37:43 -0500
  • Re: BGSOUND, no need for it Wed, 28 Aug 1996 08:30:13 -0500
  • Re: Problems/Question with Cougar Fri, 23 Aug 1996 10:27:57 -0500
  • Re: What are the problems with IDML? Fri, 16 Aug 1996 12:25:15 -0500
  • Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply -Reply Wed, 7 Aug 1996 09:00:29 -0500
  • Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply -Reply Tue, 6 Aug 1996 15:58:40 -0500
  • Re: Shadows. Tue, 6 Aug 1996 08:35:07 -0500
  • Re: Uses of <I> Mon, 5 Aug 1996 11:32:11 -0500
  • Re: Netscape and SGML Fri, 2 Aug 1996 21:00:58 -0500
• Scott Porad
  • To <P> or not to <P> Fri, 16 Aug 1996 12:50:13 -0400 (EDT)
• Sean Howard
  • Re: backgrounds Fri, 30 Aug 1996 17:24:49 -0500
  • OFF-TOPIC: Provider blues Wed, 21 Aug 1996 19:44:14 -0500
  • Re: Frames - does anyone like them? Tue, 20 Aug 1996 21:05:52 -0500
• Shawn Steele
  • Re: Frames - does anyone like them? - Summary Thu, 22 Aug 1996 11:41:46 -0600
  • Re: OFF-TOPIC: Provider blues Thu, 22 Aug 1996 11:24:02 -0600
• Simon Cox
  • Enhancements to FORMs Sun, 01 Sep 1996 10:54:00 -0400
  • Frames - does anyone like them? Tue, 20 Aug 1996 09:38:40 -0400
• Stephanos Piperoglou
  • Re: Little problem with table... Thu, 29 Aug 1996 16:14:28 +0300 (EET DST)
  • Re: Frames and Documents Thu, 29 Aug 1996 15:05:04 +0300 (EET DST)
  • Re: Frame document structure Thu, 29 Aug 1996 14:37:48 +0300 (EET DST)
  • Re: Frames still broke in NSN 3? Wed, 28 Aug 1996 16:57:00 +0300 (EET DST)
  • Re: Frames - does anyone like them? Wed, 28 Aug 1996 14:28:22 +0300 (EET DST)
  • Re: BGSOUND, no need for it Wed, 28 Aug 1996 12:48:03 +0300 (EET DST)
  • Re: Frames still broke in NSN 3? Wed, 28 Aug 1996 10:34:19 +0300 (EET DST)
  • Re: Frames - does anyone like them? Fri, 23 Aug 1996 00:05:26 +0300 (EET DST)
  • Re: Frames, my opinion Thu, 22 Aug 1996 20:29:01 +0300 (EET DST)
  • Re: Frames - does anyone like them? Wed, 21 Aug 1996 19:42:38 +0300 (EET DST)
  • Re: Frames - does anyone like them? Wed, 21 Aug 1996 10:13:24 +0300 (EET DST)
  • Re: What are the problems with IDML? Wed, 21 Aug 1996 00:50:03 +0300 (EET DST)
  • Re: what happened to align=justify? (fwd) Tue, 20 Aug 1996 17:50:09 +0300 (EET DST)
  • Re: Web Futures (was: HTML Futures (was: to <P>...)) Sun, 18 Aug 1996 21:31:50 +0300 (EET DST)
  • Re: To <P> or not to <P> Sun, 18 Aug 1996 21:06:30 +0300 (EET DST)
  • Re: What are the problems with IDML? (fwd) Sat, 17 Aug 1996 20:16:02 +0300 (EET DST)
  • Re: What are the problems with IDML? Sat, 17 Aug 1996 20:07:21 +0300 (EET DST)
  • Re: What are the problems with IDML? Sat, 17 Aug 1996 20:01:32 +0300 (EET DST)
  • Re: To <P> or not to <P> Sat, 17 Aug 1996 13:27:46 +0300 (EET DST)
  • Re: To <P> or not to <P> Sat, 17 Aug 1996 13:11:10 +0300 (EET DST)
  • Re: What are the problems with IDML? Sat, 17 Aug 1996 11:51:14 +0300 (EET DST)
  • Re: What are the problems with IDML? Fri, 16 Aug 1996 20:59:33 +0300 (EET DST)
  • Re: To <P> or not to <P> Fri, 16 Aug 1996 20:55:40 +0300 (EET DST)
• Stephen R. Laniel
  • User-definable scheme types Fri, 16 Aug 1996 20:10:53 -0400
  • Font Embedding Mon, 05 Aug 1996 20:07:38 -0400
• Steve Knoblock
  • Frames and Documents Wed, 28 Aug 1996 11:18:36 -0400
• Stu Harris
  • Re: Special Characters Thu, 29 Aug 1996 09:03:04 -0700 (PDT)
• Sunil Mishra
  • Re: HTML 3.2 -- INPUT inside BODY? Tue, 27 Aug 1996 23:31:58 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Frames - does anyone like them? Thu, 22 Aug 1996 16:32:48 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Frames - does anyone like them? Wed, 21 Aug 1996 13:36:04 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Frames - does anyone like them? Wed, 21 Aug 1996 10:23:59 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Netscape and SGML Fri, 2 Aug 1996 11:32:49 -0400 (EDT)
• T. Joseph W. Lazio
  • Re: What are the problems with IDML? Tue, 20 Aug 1996 14:23:42 -0400
• Terje Norderhaug
  • Re: Render EM as underline [was: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar] (fwd) Fri, 2 Aug 1996 17:06:52 -0700
  • Re: Render EM as underline [was: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar] (fwd) Thu, 1 Aug 1996 08:17:02 -0700
  • Re: Render EM as underline [was: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar] Thu, 1 Aug 1996 08:16:54 -0700
• The Boss
  • Re: backgrounds Fri, 30 Aug 1996 21:04:53 -0400
  • Re: Frames - does anyone like them? Tue, 27 Aug 1996 15:14:18 +0000
• Thomas Breuel
  • Re: www-html-d Digest V96 #250 Sat, 17 Aug 1996 16:37:54 -0700
• Thorkild Stray
  • Re: Special Characters Thu, 29 Aug 1996 17:11:17 +0200 (MET DST)
• TODD FRETER
  • Re: Frames - does anyone like them? -Reply Fri, 23 Aug 1996 07:13:26 -0700
• Torsten Kleber
  • automatic configuration for proxy Wed, 21 Aug 1996 15:33:15 +0200 (MET DST)
• Vincent QUINT
  • Amaya, a new Web browser/editor released by W3C Fri, 23 Aug 1996 13:02:37 +0200
• Walter Ian Kaye
  • Re: Frame document structure Sun, 29 Aug 1976 16:19:53 -0700
  • Re: Frame document structure Sat, 28 Aug 1976 21:36:50 -0700
  • Frame document structure Sat, 28 Aug 1976 08:56:12 -0700
  • Re: Frames - does anyone like them? Wed, 25 Aug 1976 19:31:45 -0700
  • Re: Frames - does anyone like them? Tue, 24 Aug 1976 15:17:54 -0700
  • Re: Frames - does anyone like them? Tue, 24 Aug 1976 13:28:08 -0700
  • Re: Problems/Question with Cougar Tue, 24 Aug 1976 12:43:53 -0700
  • Re: What are the problems with IDML? Tue, 24 Aug 1976 12:38:39 -0700
  • Re: Frames Are Improving Tue, 24 Aug 1976 13:04:01 -0700
  • Re: Frames - does anyone like them? Tue, 24 Aug 1976 10:49:39 -0700
  • Re: Problems/Question with Cougar Sat, 21 Aug 1976 19:29:22 -0700
  • Re: Frames - does anyone like them? Sat, 21 Aug 1976 18:05:05 -0700
  • Re: Frames - does anyone like them? Sat, 21 Aug 1976 14:41:02 -0700
  • Re: Netscape 3.0...A Long Way to Go Thu, 12 Aug 1976 15:44:12 -0700
  • Resizing issues (was Re: Images in Horizontal rules) Wed, 11 Aug 1976 06:24:49 -0700
  • phones (was Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar) Wed, 11 Aug 1976 06:00:06 -0700
  • Re: What about &nbsp;? Sun, 1 Aug 1976 17:13:59 -0700
  • Re: Render EM as underline [was: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Sun, 1 Aug 1976 04:56:39 -0700
• wats@infi.net
  • Take me off! Sat, 10 Aug 1996 12:51:05 +0200
• Webweaver
  • Re: W3C and Handle technology Fri, 23 Aug 1996 12:03:09 +0000 (GMT)
• Wilbur Streett
  • SELECT tab Sat, 31 Aug 1996 00:08:46 -0400
  • Client side form crash.. Sat, 31 Aug 1996 00:08:48 -0400
• William F. Hammond
  • Validation Sat, 24 Aug 1996 11:14:37 -0400 (EDT)
  • Display info in HTTP -- Was: Frames Are Improving Fri, 23 Aug 1996 10:31:26 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Background Soundtracks Thu, 22 Aug 1996 11:39:11 -0400 (EDT)
• William Perry
  • Re: Wild prediction Tue, 27 Aug 1996 07:23:18 -0700
• Wolfgang Klimt
  • Re: what happened to align=justify? Mon, 19 Aug 1996 12:33:49 +0100
• Xiangdong Yu
  • Re: www-html-d Digest V96 #259 Sat, 31 Aug 1996 14:43:47 +1030

Last message date: Sat 31 Aug 1996 - 00:00:-3596 EST
Archived on: Fri Feb 20 1998 - 13:30:34 EST

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ]
• Other archives: [ this mailing list ][ other W3C mailing lists ]