Re: Frames still broke in NSN 3?

David Perrell (davidp@earthlink.net)
Wed, 28 Aug 1996 11:31:29 -0700


Message-Id: <199608281900.MAA02012@hungary.it.earthlink.net>
From: "David Perrell" <davidp@earthlink.net>
To: <www-html@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Frames still broke in NSN 3?
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 1996 11:31:29 -0700

Abigail wrote:
> For the vertical spacing, it _is_ logical. One cell has
> an image and whitespace. It is rendered as the image, followed
> by whitespace (*below* the image, perhaps due to fixed
> width cells?). The other cell on the same row obviously
> has to be of the same height. It only contains an image,
> and that gets flushed to the bottom, leaving whitespace
> on the top.

You're right. It is logical.

The image alignment is "bottom" by default. When the space is added
horizontally, line space gets added below. The other image gets
centered in the extra vertical space. With image alignment "middle"
or "top" this doesn't occur.

Please excuse sorrily slow perception. Quitting the nit - to wit: on
with matters more serious...

David