Re: What about  ?

Walter Ian Kaye (boo@best.com)
Sun, 1 Aug 1976 17:13:59 -0700


Message-Id: <v03007804888858bf5790@[205.149.180.135]>
In-Reply-To: <khPAy4uYO1CI089yn@stack.urc.tue.nl>
Date: Sun, 1 Aug 1976 17:13:59 -0700
To: www-html@w3.org
From: Walter Ian Kaye <boo@best.com>
Subject: Re: What about &nbsp;?

At 8:33p +0200 08/01/96, Arnoud "Galactus" Engelfriet wrote:

>Eh? I thought it was defined as "connects two non-whitespace sequences
>in such a way the line will not be broken between the two."

And this behavior just happens to be fulfilled by simply treating the
nonbreaking-space as non-whitespace. And since non-whitespace does not
collapse, &nbsp; is "protected" from collapsing. No special treatment
was necessary, no special treatment was specified, and so no special
treatment was ever applied to &nbsp;. Why start now?

>This doesn't
>say anything about collapsing in either way, but as it's a _space_
>it should be collapsed, IMO.

No, it only *looks* like a space. (Why does this remind me of Dan Rather?;)


-Walter

__________________________________________________________________________
    Walter Ian Kaye <boo@best.com>     Programmer - Excel, AppleScript,
          Mountain View, CA                         ProTERM, FoxPro, HTML
 http://www.natural-innovations.com/     Musician - Guitarist, Songwriter