Re: What are the problems with IDML?

Arnoud (
Sat, 17 Aug 1996 20:38:07 +0200

From: (Arnoud "Galactus" Engelfriet)
Subject: Re: What are the problems with IDML?
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 1996 20:38:07 +0200
Message-ID: <>

In article <>,
Doug Donohoe <> wrote:
> Is
> the normative document?  It says "META ... Allowed in Content of ...
> <HEAD>".  If so, it says exactly what the other
> document says, with less detail.  If not, could you send me
> the URL for the document I should look at?  I'd appreciate it :-).

It does say that, but it also says that the HEAD *tags* are optional.
This is defined in the HTML 2.0 DTD. This means that you can leave
the <HEAD> and </HEAD> tags off and still have tags that belong in
HEAD in your document. Just make sure they don't occur anywhere in
the document BODY - ie, after the <BODY> tag or after any body

<META NAME="foo" CONTENT="bar">

is a perfectly valid document, and the META occurs in the head part
of it.

> Boy, if I can't get this straight (and I do this for a living), how
> is the average web-author, the person it is supposed to help, 
> going to understand?

They either look at
or use explicit HEAD tags. :-)


To find out more about PGP, send mail with HELP PGP in the SUBJECT line to me.
E-mail: - Please PGP encrypt your mail if you can.
Finger for public key (key ID 0x416A1A35).
Anonymity and privacy site: <>