Re: What are the problems with IDML? (fwd)

Matthew James Marnell (marnellm@portia.portia.com)
Mon, 26 Aug 1996 11:45:23 -0400

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Foteos Macrides: "Re: BGSOUND, no need for it"
Previous message: Christopher R. Maden: "Re: How should URL attribute values be parsed?"
In reply to: Matthew James Marnell: "Re: What are the problems with IDML? (fwd)"
Next in thread: Doug Donohoe: "Re: What are the problems with IDML? (fwd)"

Message-Id: <199608261545.LAA00467@portia.portia.com>
cc: www-html@w3.org
Subject: Re: What are the problems with IDML? (fwd) 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 26 Aug 1996 09:47:50 EDT."
             <199608261347.JAA29676@portia.portia.com> 
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 1996 11:45:23 -0400
From: Matthew James Marnell <marnellm@portia.portia.com>

:>Nevermind, go back to whatever you were doing.

Nevermind, I like the thing that Daniel W. Connolly posted
about http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/Search/ .

Pity that the likelyhood of it being implemented in anything
besides unused reference tools remains as unlikely as ever.

Matt

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Foteos Macrides: "Re: BGSOUND, no need for it"
Previous message: Christopher R. Maden: "Re: How should URL attribute values be parsed?"
In reply to: Matthew James Marnell: "Re: What are the problems with IDML? (fwd)"
Next in thread: Doug Donohoe: "Re: What are the problems with IDML? (fwd)"