Re: What are the problems with IDML?

Keith M. Corbett (kmc@harlequin.com)
Mon, 19 Aug 1996 10:19:45 -0400


Message-Id: <2.2.32.19960819141945.00968c68@mailhost.harlequin.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 1996 10:19:45 -0400
To: Stephanos Piperoglou <stephanos@hol.gr>
From: "Keith M. Corbett" <kmc@harlequin.com>
Subject: Re: What are the problems with IDML? 
Cc: "Keith M. Corbett" <kmc@harlequin.com>,

At 11:51 AM 8/17/96 +0300, Stephanos Piperoglou wrote:

>Either way, I don't see any browsers giving a dime about these elements
>anyway, so even if there is a right and holy way of defining LINKs etc. it
>won't make any difference because the only way for a user to be aware of
>their content is to look at the source...

Or to print, or search, or graph the content using compliant tools.

It's not surprising the commercial browsers don't support these tags yet,
but I'm sure they will. Through most of the real innovations in HTML they
have followed not led.

/kmc