www-tag@w3.org from March 2012 by author

Anne van Kesteren

• Re: ACTION 610: Draft Meta Formats section for W3C site (Thursday, 8 March)

ashok malhotra

• Re: ACTION-647 Product page for Client-side Storage (Wednesday, 21 March)
• ACTION-647 Product page for Client-side Storage (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Minutes from March 08 TAG Telcon (Friday, 9 March)

Christopher Gutteridge

• Brass Tacks (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: HTTP Range 14 (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: HTTP Range 14 (Sunday, 4 March)
• HTTP Range 14 (Sunday, 4 March)

Daniel Appelquist

• Re: Draft F2F agenda entry on copyright and linking (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: Draft F2F agenda entry on copyright and linking (Tuesday, 20 March)

Danny Ayers

• Re: httpRange-14 Change Proposal [editorial tweaks] (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: httpRange-14 Change Proposal [editorial tweaks] (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: httpRange-14 Change Proposal [editorial tweaks] (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: URIs, used in RDF, that do not have associated documentation (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: URIs, used in RDF, that do not have associated documentation (Wednesday, 28 March)

David Booth

• Re: Classification of ISSUE-57 change proposals (Saturday, 31 March)
• Re: The TAG Member's Guide to ISSUE-57 Discussion - F2F reading (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: Proposal to amend the httpRange-14 resolution (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: httpRange-14 Change Proposal (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: httpRange-14 Change Proposal [editorial tweaks] (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: The TAG Member's Guide to ISSUE-57 Discussion - F2F reading (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: httpRange-14 Conformance (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: Middle ground change proposal for httpRange-14 -- submission (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: Middle ground change proposal for httpRange-14 -- submission (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: Middle ground change proposal for httpRange-14 -- submission (Monday, 26 March)
• Middle ground change proposal for httpRange-14 -- submission (Monday, 26 March)
• Re: either strengthen or retract httpRange-14(a) (Saturday, 24 March)
• Re: Call for proposals to amend the "httpRange-14 resolution" (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: HTTP Range 14 (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: Call for proposals to amend the "httpRange-14 resolution" (Thursday, 1 March)
• RE: Understanding URI Hosting Practice as Support for Documentation Discovery: 'meaning of meaning' (Thursday, 1 March)

Eric J. Bowman

• Re: Fwd: http+aes URI scheme (Monday, 5 March)

Graham Klyne

• Re: HTTP Range 14 (Sunday, 4 March)
• Re: HTTP Range 14 (Sunday, 4 March)

Gregg Kellogg

• Re: Comments on "Providing and Discovering Definitions of URIs" (Thursday, 1 March)

Henry S. Thompson

• Fragment identifiers, RFC3023bis: Preparing for the F2F (ACTION-675) (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: ACTION 610: Draft Meta Formats section for W3C site (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: ACTION 610: Draft Meta Formats section for W3C site (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: ACTION 610: Draft Meta Formats section for W3C site (Thursday, 8 March)
• Draft minutes of TAG telcon 2012-03-01 (Monday, 5 March)

Jeni Tennison

• Re: Classification of ISSUE-57 change proposals (Friday, 30 March)
• Fwd: Problem beyond the design decision of HttpRange-14 (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: httpRange-14 Change Proposal [editorial tweaks] (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: httpRange-14 Change Proposal [editorial tweaks] (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: httpRange-14 Change Proposal (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: httpRange-14 Change Proposal (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: httpRange-14 Change Proposal (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: httpRange-14 Change Proposal (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: httpRange-14 Change Proposal (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: The TAG Member's Guide to ISSUE-57 Discussion - F2F reading (Wednesday, 28 March)
• httpRange-14 Conformance (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: Change Proposal for HttpRange-14 (Monday, 26 March)
• Re: httpRange-14 Change Proposal (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: httpRange-14 Change Proposal (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: Change Proposal for HttpRange-14 (Sunday, 25 March)
• httpRange-14 Change Proposal (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: Draft F2F agenda entry on copyright and linking (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: Need link to Copyright & Linking draft for F2F required reading (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: ACTION-678: Fwd: Dom visiting the TAG (Sunday, 18 March)
• Re: ACTION 610: Draft Meta Formats section for W3C site (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: ACTION 610: Draft Meta Formats section for W3C site (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: ACTION 610: Draft Meta Formats section for W3C site (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: TAG liaison at IETF Paris (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: ACTION 610: Draft Meta Formats section for W3C site (Tuesday, 6 March)

Jonathan A Rees

• Re: Classification of ISSUE-57 change proposals (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: Classification of ISSUE-57 change proposals (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: Classification of ISSUE-57 change proposals (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: Call for Two Year Feature Freeze -- to httpRange-14 resolution (Thursday, 29 March)
• Classification of ISSUE-57 change proposals (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: Change Proposal 25 for HttpRange-14 (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: The TAG Member's Guide to ISSUE-57 Discussion - F2F reading (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: URIs, used in RDF, that do not have associated documentation (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: Proposal to amend the httpRange-14 resolution (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: Proposal to amend the httpRange-14 resolution (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: URIs, used in RDF, that do not have associated documentation (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: Proposal to amend the httpRange-14 resolution (Tuesday, 27 March)
• The TAG Member's Guide to ISSUE-57 Discussion - F2F reading (Tuesday, 27 March)
• ISSUE-57 F2F reading (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: Proposal to amend the httpRange-14 resolution (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: URIs, used in RDF, that do not have associated documentation (Tuesday, 27 March)
• URIs, used in RDF, that do not have associated documentation (Monday, 26 March)
• Re: Proposal to amend the httpRange-14 resolution (Monday, 26 March)
• Re: Proposal to amend the httpRange-14 resolution (Monday, 26 March)
• How to move ISSUE-57 off the TAG's plate (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: httpRange-14 Change Proposal (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: httpRange-14 Change Proposal (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: either strengthen or retract httpRange-14(a) (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: httpRange-14 Change Proposal (Sunday, 25 March)
• Happy 10th birthday ISSUE-14 (Sunday, 25 March)
• TAG prep for ISSUE-57 (httpRange-14, etc.) session (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: Call for proposals to amend the "httpRange-14 resolution" (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: http+aes URI scheme (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: http+aes URI scheme (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: ACTION 610: Draft Meta Formats section for W3C site (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: Understanding URI Hosting Practice as Support for Documentation Discovery: 'meaning of meaning' (Friday, 2 March)
• either strengthen or retract httpRange-14(a) (Friday, 2 March)
• Two httpRange-14 change proposals (Thursday, 1 March)
• Re: Proposal to amend the "httpRange-14 resolution" (Thursday, 1 March)
• tracking change proposals and issues (Thursday, 1 March)

Jürgen Jakobitsch

• Re: Call for Two Year Feature Freeze -- to httpRange-14 resolution (Thursday, 29 March)

Kingsley Idehen

• Re: URIs, used in RDF, that do not have associated documentation (Saturday, 31 March)
• Re: Proposal to amend the httpRange-14 resolution (Saturday, 31 March)
• Re: Proposal to amend the httpRange-14 resolution (Saturday, 31 March)
• Re: Classification of ISSUE-57 change proposals (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: Classification of ISSUE-57 change proposals (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: URIs, used in RDF, that do not have associated documentation (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: Call for Two Year Feature Freeze -- to httpRange-14 resolution (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: httpRange-14 Change Proposal [editorial tweaks] (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: httpRange-14 Change Proposal [editorial tweaks] (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: httpRange-14 Change Proposal [editorial tweaks] (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: httpRange-14 Change Proposal (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: httpRange-14 Change Proposal (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: URIs, used in RDF, that do not have associated documentation (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: URIs, used in RDF, that do not have associated documentation (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: httpRange-14 Change Proposal (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: URIs, used in RDF, that do not have associated documentation (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: Middle ground change proposal for httpRange-14 -- submission (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: Middle ground change proposal for httpRange-14 -- submission (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: Middle ground change proposal for httpRange-14 -- submission (Monday, 26 March)
• Re: either strengthen or retract httpRange-14(a) (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: either strengthen or retract httpRange-14(a) (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: HTTP Range 14 (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: HTTP Range 14 (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: HTTP Range 14 (Sunday, 4 March)
• Re: HTTP Range 14 (Sunday, 4 March)
• Re: HTTP Range 14 (Sunday, 4 March)
• Re: Understanding URI Hosting Practice as Support for Documentation Discovery: 'meaning of meaning' (Friday, 2 March)

Larry Masinter

• RE: ACTION 610: Draft Meta Formats section for W3C site (Monday, 12 March)
• FW: Minutes of the W3C/IETF Coordination Call, 2012-02-28 (Friday, 2 March)

Martin J. Dürst

• Re: ACTION 610: Draft Meta Formats section for W3C site (Tuesday, 13 March)

Melvin Carvalho

• Re: Call for Two Year Feature Freeze -- to httpRange-14 resolution (Thursday, 29 March)
• Call for Two Year Feature Freeze -- to httpRange-14 resolution (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: Happy 10th birthday ISSUE-14 (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: HTTP Range 14 (Monday, 5 March)

Mo McRoberts

• Re: Proposal to amend the "httpRange-14 resolution" (Thursday, 1 March)
• Re: Proposal to amend the "httpRange-14 resolution" (Thursday, 1 March)
• Proposal to amend the "httpRange-14 resolution" (Thursday, 1 March)

Nathan

• Re: Call for Two Year Feature Freeze -- to httpRange-14 resolution (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: httpRange-14 Change Proposal (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: httpRange-14 Change Proposal (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: httpRange-14 Change Proposal (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: httpRange-14 Change Proposal (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: httpRange-14 Change Proposal (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: httpRange-14 Change Proposal (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: httpRange-14 Change Proposal (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: httpRange-14 Change Proposal (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: Change Proposal 25 for HttpRange-14 (Sunday, 25 March)

Noah Mendelsohn

• Re: Classification of ISSUE-57 change proposals (Saturday, 31 March)
• Re: Classification of ISSUE-57 change proposals (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: Classification of ISSUE-57 change proposals (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: Classification of ISSUE-57 change proposals (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: URIs, used in RDF, that do not have associated documentation (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: Classification of ISSUE-57 change proposals (Friday, 30 March)
• Microsoft HTTP S&M (Thursday, 29 March)
• There will be no TAG teleconference tomorrow, 29 March 2012 (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: Privacy by Design in APIs (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: URIs, used in RDF, that do not have associated documentation (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: Minutes from March 15 TAG Telcon (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: httpRange-14 Change Proposal (Monday, 26 March)
• Re: httpRange-14 Change Proposal (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: httpRange-14 Change Proposal (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: httpRange-14 Change Proposal (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: httpRange-14 Change Proposal (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: httpRange-14 Change Proposal (Sunday, 25 March)
• Minutes of TAG teleconference of 22 March 2012 (Saturday, 24 March)
• Re: Requesting update on HTML/XML unification work (Thursday, 22 March)
• Preliminary TAG F2F Agenda ready for review (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Requesting update on HTML/XML unification work (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Agenda for TAG call on 22 April 2011 (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: ACTION-647 Product page for Client-side Storage (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: Draft F2F agenda entry on copyright and linking (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Draft F2F agenda entry on copyright and linking (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Need link to Copyright & Linking draft for F2F required reading (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Invitation to meet with the TAG (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: ACTION-678: Fwd: Dom visiting the TAG (Monday, 19 March)
• ACTION-678: Fwd: Dom visiting the TAG (Sunday, 18 March)
• Agenda for the TAG teleconference of 15 March 2012 (Wednesday, 14 March)
• ACTION-560: Polyglot documents (Monday, 12 March)
• Draft on Web App storage for TAG F2F (Monday, 12 March)
• Re: Requesting update on HTML/XML unification work (Monday, 12 March)
• Requesting update on HTML/XML unification work (Monday, 12 March)
• Meeting with the TAG to discuss RFC 3023bis and fragment identifier semantics (Monday, 12 March)
• Re: ACTION 610: Draft Meta Formats section for W3C site (Friday, 9 March)
• Re: http+aes URI scheme (Thursday, 8 March)
• Agenda for TAG teleconference of 8 March - F2F planning (Wednesday, 7 March)
• TAG liaison at IETF Paris (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: ACTION 610: Draft Meta Formats section for W3C site (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Fwd: http+aes URI scheme (Monday, 5 March)

Norman Walsh

• Re: Happy 10th birthday ISSUE-14 (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: Requesting update on HTML/XML unification work (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Requesting update on HTML/XML unification work (Thursday, 22 March)

Pat Hayes

• Re: URIs, used in RDF, that do not have associated documentation (Saturday, 31 March)
• Re: The TAG Member's Guide to ISSUE-57 Discussion - F2F reading (Saturday, 31 March)
• Re: The TAG Member's Guide to ISSUE-57 Discussion - F2F reading (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: URIs, used in RDF, that do not have associated documentation (Wednesday, 28 March)

Robin Berjon

• Privacy by Design in APIs (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Minutes from March 15 TAG Telcon (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: ACTION 610: Draft Meta Formats section for W3C site (Tuesday, 13 March)
• Re: Requesting update on HTML/XML unification work (Monday, 12 March)
• Re: ACTION 610: Draft Meta Formats section for W3C site (Friday, 9 March)
• Re: Agenda for TAG teleconference of 8 March - F2F planning (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: TAG liaison at IETF Paris (Wednesday, 7 March)

Roy T. Fielding

• Re: Classification of ISSUE-57 change proposals (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: URIs, used in RDF, that do not have associated documentation (Wednesday, 28 March)

Tim Berners-Lee

• Re: Privacy by Design in APIs (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: Proposal to amend the httpRange-14 resolution (Monday, 26 March)
• Re: httpRange-14 Change Proposal (Monday, 26 March)
• Re: httpRange-14 Change Proposal (Sunday, 25 March)
• Change Proposal 25 for HttpRange-14 (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: Happy 10th birthday ISSUE-14 (Sunday, 25 March)

Tore Eriksson

• Re: Proposal to amend the httpRange-14 resolution (Saturday, 31 March)
• Proposal to amend the httpRange-14 resolution [revision] (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: URIs, used in RDF, that do not have associated documentation (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: URIs, used in RDF, that do not have associated documentation (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: Proposal to amend the httpRange-14 resolution (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: Proposal to amend the httpRange-14 resolution (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: Proposal to amend the httpRange-14 resolution (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Proposal to amend the httpRange-14 resolution (Sunday, 25 March)

Yves Lafon

• Re: ACTION-678: Fwd: Dom visiting the TAG (Monday, 19 March)
• Re: TAG liaison at IETF Paris (Wednesday, 7 March)

トーレ　エリクソン

• Re: URIs, used in RDF, that do not have associated documentation (Saturday, 31 March)
• Re: Proposal to amend the httpRange-14 resolution [revision] (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: httpRange-14 Change Proposal (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: URIs, used in RDF, that do not have associated documentation (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: URIs, used in RDF, that do not have associated documentation (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: URIs, used in RDF, that do not have associated documentation (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: URIs, used in RDF, that do not have associated documentation (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: Proposal to amend the httpRange-14 resolution (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: URIs, used in RDF, that do not have associated documentation (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: Middle ground change proposal for httpRange-14 -- submission (Monday, 26 March)
• Re: Proposal to amend the httpRange-14 resolution (Monday, 26 March)

Last message date: Saturday, 31 March 2012 20:53:33 UTC