- From: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 09:09:42 -0400
- To: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
- CC: "www-tag@w3.org List" <www-tag@w3.org>
Thank you, I appreciate it. Not to appear ungrateful, but how are things going with the API draft for the F2F? I hope we can still get something in time for everyone to read and consider before the meeting if that's practical. Thank you again. Noah On 3/27/2012 8:47 AM, Robin Berjon wrote: > They are available (as draft) at http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/03/15-minutes.html. > > Sorry for the delay. > > Text follows. > > === > > [1]W3C > > [1] http://www.w3.org/ > > - DRAFT - > > TAG > > 15 Mar 2012 > > [2]Agenda > > [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/04/02-agenda > > Attendees > > Present > AM, JT, LM, NM, PL, RB, YL, HT, JAR > > Regrets > TBL > > Chair > NM > > Scribe > Robin Berjon > > Contents > > * [3]Topics > 1. [4]Convene > 2. [5]Minutes Approval > 3. [6]Administrative items > 4. [7]IETF Paris Meeting > 5. [8]F2F Planning > 6. [9]HTML.next > 7. [10]<scribe> Topic: Web Application Storage > 8. [11]Pending Review Items > 9. [12]Overdue actions > * [13]Summary of Action Items > __________________________________________________________ > > <JeniT> ScribeNick: darobin > > <scribe> Scribe: Robin Berjon > > Date: 15 Mar 2012 > > Convene > > NM: regrets next week? > > RB: yes, I'm in China > > NM: probable cancellation on the 29th, but we'll see later > > Minutes Approval > > <noah> [14]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/03/08-minutes.html > > [14] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/03/08-minutes.html > > RESOLUTION: minutes 20120308 approved > > Administrative items > > NM summarises agenda > > NM: we'll look at the f2f agenda and revisit if needed > > ACTION-641? > > <trackbot> ACTION-641 -- Noah Mendelsohn to try and find list > of review issues relating to HTML5 from earlier discussions -- > due 2012-03-01 -- PENDINGREVIEW > > <trackbot> > [15]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/641 > > [15] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/641 > > NM: Larry suggested finding priority list, in the meantime we > more or less decided not to do HTML.next > ... Robin, how confident about API Privacy? > > RB: 10 days earlier? > > NM: not hard, but earlier is useful > > RB: I'll have it done > > NM: logistics? > ... agenda still rough, will take shape based on advice today > ... looking for guidance on http+aes > > LM: i think things have moved on and that it isn't we shouldn't > bother talking about it > ... -1 > > JT: didn't we discuss this last week and say yes we should talk > about it > > NM: won't go into details, but question is: should we schedule > a session on this? > > JT: what's happened, Larry? > > LM: there's an encrypted media task force > > NM: JAR talking about are there different classes of URIs, > public and private, HT sems to be on side of thinking this is a > bad idea > > HT: willing to be educated! > > NM: so, that's a maybe > > JT: the minutes last week say that NM would schedule a > discussion this week > > LM: there's an encrypted media TF > > NM: when do they report? > > LM: I don't know; there was a serious proposal from MS, Google, > and Cable Labs about this > > NM: IETF? > > LM: no, this is in HTML WG > > HT: suggest you contact the co-chairs and ask what they expect > in terms of timing > > <scribe> ACTION: Noah to contact HTML WG co-chairs to ask about > timing for output of Encrypted Media TF > > <trackbot> Created ACTION-677 - Contact HTML WG co-chairs to > ask about timing for output of Encrypted Media TF [on Noah > Mendelsohn - due 2012-03-22]. > > <noah> . ACTION: Noah to contact HTML WG chairs to get advice > on likely trajectory of work on encryted media > > <noah> ACTION-677 Due 2012-03-24 > > <trackbot> ACTION-677 Contact HTML WG co-chairs to ask about > timing for output of Encrypted Media TF due date now 2012-03-24 > > NM: any other admin? > > [nope] > > IETF Paris Meeting > > NM: need for further work? > > YL: Larry will be around, Robin can be around as needed > ... will contact the AD of app area for a meeting > ... I will do this shortly > ... expect a meeting at the beginning of the week to discuss > what we're doing > > LM: another thing that's relevant for TAG is HTTP WG, SPDY, > HTTP2 > > YL: that's on Thu; there's also Mon for HTTPbis > > LM: IRI working group will meet, there's been a lot of progress > ... Websec meets, of course, and is center of work on web > security, CORS, etc. > > YL: there are other things around privacy that may be of > interest to people, plus general discussion, coordination > > LM: applications area directorate (HT is member) usually meets > > YL: PLH and TLR will be there, and MarkN > > LM: apps area working group will take up MIME registry update > > YL: lots of opportunities for impromptu meetings, just need to > find slots to make interesting to everybody > ... [16]https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/83/agenda.html > > [16] https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/83/agenda.html > > LM: worthwhile reviewing document on MIME registry > ... lots of progress on IRI > ... involvement from I18N WG reviewing the document > ... Web Security group meets, things to do there > > YL: apps-area, websec (monday) > > LM: as well of course as RTCWeb > > YL: good summary of the most interesting stuff for us > > LM: MarkN has written an ID capturing the work on discussing > registries in general, fixing IANA > ... there should be good discussion of that > > YL: I don't think there's anything schedule for that > > LM: yes, MarkN said he was trying to schedule an impromptu on > this > > <Zakim> jar, you wanted to raise his very annoying HTTP > question > > JAR: want to get a volunteer for my question to the HTTP WG > > <Yves> > [17]https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-appsawg-happia > na-00 > > [17] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-appsawg-happiana-00 > > JAR: not discuss now, just looking for volunteer > > <noah> JAR: Question is whether "representation" is used as a > term of art, or more informally > > JAR: YL are you volunteering to understand my question? > > YL: I'll try to convey, understanding is another problem :) > > <Larry> > [18]http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-appsawg-happian > a-00 > > [18] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-appsawg-happiana-00 > > <jar> I sent the question on Feb 7 to httpbis > > <jar> will dig up pointer > > YL: given a pointer, I can more easily raise it > > JAR: will dig it up > > HT: I would encourage you to come up with an example where one > usage applies and another doesn't > ... to help them understand what the problem is, why does this > make a difference? > ... sort of a minimal pair approach > > <jar> > [19]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2012JanMar > /0412.html > > [19] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2012JanMar/0412.html > > JAR: this might only matter to RDF and they might not care > about RDF > > <Larry> " Happy IANA: Making Large-Scale Registries More > User-Friendly" > > HT: I don't think that's true > ... but you can try something on me before exposing it more > widely > > NM: okay for IETF > > F2F Planning > > <jar> more detail in blog post pointed from > [20]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2012JanMar > /0463.html > > [20] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2012JanMar/0463.html > > NM: gathered ideas from last week > > <noah> > [21]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/03/15-agenda#F2Fplanning > > [21] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/03/15-agenda#F2Fplanning > > NM: look at "Chair's working list of likely agenda topics" > > NM reads from agenda > > NM: we might want to get into some of the IETF topics and dig > in, but we'll see based on report > ... Chris is coming > ... want to look into whether FragID and MIME is still a > priority > ... extensive time on Publishing and Linking, maybe careful > walk through > > JT: it could be useful if Rigo were there > > YL: Rigo is not in Sophia anymore > > HT: any communication with Rigo should make clear how long > we're spending on this > > <Larry> i don't think meeting with Rigo should be in the > critical path of us making progress on this document > > <Larry> if he can meet with us, fine, but let's get on with it > > JT: if he happens to be around that would be good, but if not > it doesn't make sense > > NM: JAR you're still waiting for feedback on httpRange-14 > change proposals > > JAR: I don't think we should focus we should focus on the > baseline document > ... but we should try to figure out where this is going > > NM: see if we can propose a way forward > > JAR: even without change, we should figure out what to do with > this > ... even if it's say it's not our job > > <Ashok> +1 to Jar > > NM: I welcome it if you want to lead and sketch out what the > agenda should be for your session > > JAR: I'll think hard about how to best make use of the time > > <Larry> I'd like a clear option to drop this, I don't think > things are converging > > NM: Robin will have a draft on API Privacy > ... AM on local storage? > > AM: I've written a draft, it's different from the usual stuff, > sent for review to LM and RB to see if it was sensible > > <jar> larry, noted > > AM: depending on the response, we'll see what discussion there > ought to be > > NM: so if people like it, we can make it a major topic, if not > it'll be brief > > AM: correct > > NM: will be looking at priorities > ... would prefer not to burn a lot of time on this > ... but have some nervousness that we only have three > priorities > ... but we should make sure we're well engaged > ... HT mentioned PhiloWeb at WWW2012 > ... the TAG formally lists issues, are we tracking them, > working on them, etc. > ... we should look at the relationship between products and > issues > ... ideally, we should have shepherds for issues > ... if any of you want to go through issues, see which can be > closed, which are being forgotten about, etc. it would be > useful > ... will take suggestions now or offline > > JT: Robin mentioned getting Dom to talk to us about mobile > stuff > > NM: he lives close? > > RB: yes, but we should make sure that we have something useful > to discuss with him > > <scribe> ACTION: Robin to ask Dom if there's something he think > would be worth discussing with the TAG > > <trackbot> Created ACTION-678 - Ask Dom if there's something he > think would be worth discussing with the TAG [on Robin Berjon - > due 2012-03-22]. > > <noah> RB: Can Chris Lilley brief us on SVG change to HTML > syntax > > NM: we can always change the agenda of course > ... please send me the reading list quickly > > HTML.next > > <noah> ACTION-641? > > <trackbot> ACTION-641 -- Noah Mendelsohn to try and find list > of review issues relating to HTML5 from earlier discussions -- > due 2012-03-01 -- PENDINGREVIEW > > <trackbot> > [22]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/641 > > [22] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/641 > > <noah> > [23]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2009/09/HTMLIssuesRevised.pdf > > [23] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2009/09/HTMLIssuesRevised.pdf > > NM: matrix of issues that we thought we might want to look at > ... tentatively agreed not to look into this now > > <Larry> at most we should forward the list to the HTML working > group... > > NM: question: look through this list, and if anything in this > list makes you feel like we should then raise it > > LM: can we ask the list? > > NM: the hesitancy is that some of these things might look like > different things to different people > ... are you saying someone should send this to the HTML WG? > > LM: just a pointer > ... looking for ways not to spend too much time > > NM: that's fine by me > > <Larry> that's ok with me not to spend time on this > > NM: not hearing a lot of interest in picking this up > ... we can close the action > > <noah> close ACTION-641 > > <trackbot> ACTION-641 Try and find list of review issues > relating to HTML5 from earlier discussions closed > > <scribe> Topic: Web Application Storage > > NM: AM circulated a draft, people will feed back > > AM: yes > > Pending Review Items > > <noah> > [24]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/pendingrevie > w > > [24] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/pendingreview > > <noah> ACTION-602? > > <trackbot> ACTION-602 -- Noah Mendelsohn to work with IETF > liaisons to propose possible TAG participation in IETF Paris -- > due 2012-03-13 -- PENDINGREVIEW > > <trackbot> > [25]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/602 > > [25] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/602 > > <noah> close ACTION-602 > > <trackbot> ACTION-602 Work with IETF liaisons to propose > possible TAG participation in IETF Paris closed > > <noah> ACTION-662> > > <noah> ACTION-662? > > <trackbot> ACTION-662 -- Robin Berjon to redraft proposed > product page on API Minimization > ([26]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/apiminimization.html) > -- due 2012-01-31 -- PENDINGREVIEW > > [26] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/apiminimization.html) > > <trackbot> > [27]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/662 > > [27] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/662 > > <noah> ACTION-656 > > <noah> ACTION-656? > > <trackbot> ACTION-656 -- Noah Mendelsohn to schedule discussion > of possibly getting W3C to invest in technologies for liberal > XML processing (e.g. XML5) -- due 2012-01-31 -- PENDINGREVIEW > > <trackbot> > [28]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/656 > > [28] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/656 > > NM: I believe this came out of the discussion with NDW and > HTML/XML TF > ... this has already been taken by the XML-ER CG > > <noah> [29]http://www.w3.org/community/xml-er/ > > [29] http://www.w3.org/community/xml-er/ > > NM: they're doing it. LM are you happy with where this is? > > LM: have there been any comments? > > NM: there's a mailing list with active discussion > ... active discussion and the start of a spec from AnneVK > > <Larry> Can we get a summary of the discussion so far? > > <Larry> is the SVG in HTML syntax related to this discussion? > > NM: some discussion on requirements and use cases, some > browser-related stuff, some HTML-at-front-of-pipeline, some > unification, some database error correction, etc. > ... give and take on use cases, though Anne has spec and pieces > of an implementation > > <noah> RB: Anne is not disinclined to change if spec really > needs changing > > <noah> NM: I meant more that he mostly wants to focus on > user-facing use cases, and is less inclined to change for, e.g. > database back ends > > <noah> RB: Right > > NM: Anne targeting UCs that he perceives as high priority, > might disagree with some of the other UCs > > <noah> RB: And others agree > > <ht> I predict TBL will push back on "not punishing users". . . > > <Zakim> ht, you wanted to request discussion about goals and > use cases at F2F > > HT: I think it's worth talking about this, if there's room > ... we should think about whether we're happy with the goals of > this TF and if we should try to influence them > > LM: would you make a proposal? > > HT: no, I want to have some time to think about this > > <noah> Adding this note to ACTION-656: > > <noah> Per HT request on 15 March 2012, I think we should > discuss whether we think XML-ER is adopting the right goals and > use cases. At F2F if it fits. > > HT: if we have any love in our heart of Tim's suggestion to > encourage better markup, I'd like to know > > <Larry> I'd like to hear some strawman proposals so that we > don't go in circles on "Yes, it's a hard problem" > > <noah> LM: Encourage Henry to come up with "strawman" > proposals. Even something to knock down. > > NM: HT, where are we standing on polyglot? > > HT: issue about BOMs, and another issue XML Core WG is still > working on > > NM: wondering if mixing with XML ER is a good idae > > HT: probably not > > <Larry> I had another category that wasn't "polyglot" I was > calling "Multi-view": single content stream that can be viewed > as two different types, but mean DIFFERENT but related things > > <noah> > [30]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/overdue?sort > =owner > > [30] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/overdue?sort=owner > > Overdue actions > > <noah> ACTION-669? > > <trackbot> ACTION-669 -- Henry Thompson to review > [31]http://www.w3.org/TR/qaframe-spec/#ref-define-practice and > see whether TAG needs to do more on references to evolving > specs Due: 2012-08-01 -- due 2012-02-09 -- OPEN > > [31] http://www.w3.org/TR/qaframe-spec/#ref-define-practice > > <trackbot> > [32]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/669 > > [32] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/669 > > <noah> ACTION-628? > > <trackbot> ACTION-628 -- Henry Thompson to work with Chris > Lilley to bring forward prose for 3023bis wrt generic > processing of fragment identifiers which addresses the rdf+xml > and xhtml+xml issues -- due 2012-02-14 -- OPEN > > <trackbot> > [33]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/628 > > [33] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/628 > > <noah> Henry to bump dates on all actions. > > <noah> ACTION-572? > > <trackbot> ACTION-572 -- Yves Lafon to look at appcache in > HTML5 -- due 2012-03-06 -- OPEN > > <trackbot> > [34]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/572 > > [34] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/572 > > <JeniT> ScribeNick: JeniT > > NM: Do we need to talk about this at F2F? Is it combined with > web storage? > > YL: I think my action is to see whether appcache fits with AM's > work on web storage > > <darobin> ScribeNick: darobin > > <noah> close ACTION-572 > > <trackbot> ACTION-572 Look at appcache in HTML5 closed > > <JeniT> ScribeNick: darobin > > YL: check if appcache feeds into AM's document on local storage > > <noah> ACTION Yves to check how Appcache should fit into > Ashok's storage document - Due 2012-04-02 > > <trackbot> Created ACTION-679 - check how Appcache should fit > into Ashok's storage document [on Yves Lafon - due 2012-04-02]. > > <noah> ACTION-566? > > <trackbot> ACTION-566 -- Yves Lafon to investigate possible > liaison or meeting with IETF (maybe IAB) on privacy -- due > 2012-01-24 -- OPEN > > <trackbot> > [35]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/566 > > [35] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/566 > > NM: seems relevant given Paris > > YL: I know that Wendy(?) will be there, working on privacy > don't know if we want to track that > > NM: we can close, depends on if the group wants to work on this > > YL: liaising is a good thing, not sure if it should be only > about privacy > > <noah> close ACTION-566 > > <trackbot> ACTION-566 Investigate possible liaison or meeting > with IETF (maybe IAB) on privacy closed > > <noah> ACTION-638 > > <noah> ACTION-638? > > <trackbot> ACTION-638 -- Yves Lafon to help Noah figure out > best ways, if at all, for TAG to participate in IETF paris -- > due 2012-02-15 -- OPEN > > <trackbot> > [36]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/638 > > [36] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/638 > > <noah> ACTION-638 Due 2012-03-26 > > <trackbot> ACTION-638 Help Noah figure out best ways, if at > all, for TAG to participate in IETF paris due date now > 2012-03-26 > > <noah> ACTION-594? > > <trackbot> ACTION-594 -- Yves Lafon to with Peter and Henry > produce partial revision of fragment id finding -- due > 2012-03-13 -- OPEN > > <trackbot> > [37]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/594 > > [37] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/594 > > NM: seems not to be moving. Thoughts? > > <Larry> suggest reviewing > [38]http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-appsawg-media-type-re > gs-03 > > [38] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-appsawg-media-type-regs-03 > > <noah> Suggest we discuss priority of fragids at F2F > > <Larry> "Media Type Specifications and Registration Procedures" > > NM: we'll settle that at the f2f > > LM: (XXX?) document being revised > > NM: better path forward? > > LM: possibly > > NM: we can discuss the priority at the f2f > > <noah> ACTION-606? > > <trackbot> ACTION-606 -- Peter Linss to invite I18N and other > concerned groups to provide written technical input as prep to > discussion with the TAG regarding unicode normalization -- due > 2012-03-06 -- OPEN > > <trackbot> > [39]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/606 > > [39] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/606 > > PL: still interest in doing this > > <noah> ACTION-606 Due 2012-05-01 > > <trackbot> ACTION-606 Invite I18N and other concerned groups to > provide written technical input as prep to discussion with the > TAG regarding unicode normalization due date now 2012-05-01 > > <noah> ACTION-611? > > <trackbot> ACTION-611 -- Larry Masinter to draft initial cut at > [40]http://www.w3.org/standards/webarch/protocols -- due > 2012-02-17 -- OPEN > > [40] http://www.w3.org/standards/webarch/protocols > > <trackbot> > [41]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/611 > > [41] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/611 > > NM: nothing says relaxing on your vacation like drafting TAG > pages! > > <noah> ACTION-611 Due 2012-05 > > <trackbot> ACTION-611 Draft initial cut at > [42]http://www.w3.org/standards/webarch/protocols due date now > 2012-05 > > [42] http://www.w3.org/standards/webarch/protocols > > <noah> Actually, I said: Nothing makes a relaxing vacation like > drafting architecture pages > > LM: rethinking the priorities on these > ... any opinions? might drop it > > NM: it's a good thing for the TAG to contribute to these pages, > but only so far I want to push people. Jeni did a great job, > but if other people are not doing actions we should close them > > <noah> close ACTION-611 > > <trackbot> ACTION-611 Draft initial cut at > [43]http://www.w3.org/standards/webarch/protocols closed > > [43] http://www.w3.org/standards/webarch/protocols > > <noah> ACTION-670? > > <trackbot> ACTION-670 -- Noah Mendelsohn to update product > priority list to mark MIMEWeb completed after final product > page available -- due 2012-03-01 -- OPEN > > <trackbot> > [44]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/670 > > [44] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/670 > > <Larry> if Ian wants us to help out with these, he can ask us > to re-open > > NM: note the closing of these efforts in the product page > > <noah> ACTION-670 Due 2012-05-01 > > <trackbot> ACTION-670 Update product priority list to mark > MIMEWeb completed after final product page available due date > now 2012-05-01 > > <Larry> mnot's draft and media type drafts are new since we > last talked about this > > <noah> ACTION-657? > > <trackbot> ACTION-657 -- Noah Mendelsohn to schedule telcon > discussion of possible XML/HTML Unification next steps -- due > 2012-03-06 -- OPEN > > <trackbot> > [45]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/657 > > [45] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/657 > > NM: asked NDW if he had reactions > > <noah> ACTION-657 Due 2012-04-10 > > <trackbot> ACTION-657 Schedule telcon discussion of possible > XML/HTML Unification next steps due date now 2012-04-10 > > <noah> ACTION-664? > > <trackbot> ACTION-664 -- Noah Mendelsohn to announce completion > of TAG work on Microdata/RDFa as recorded in > [46]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/htmldata.html and to > finalize the product page and associated links -- due > 2012-01-26 -- OPEN > > [46] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/htmldata.html > > <trackbot> > [47]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/664 > > [47] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/664 > > <noah> ACTION-664 Due 2012-04-17 > > <trackbot> ACTION-664 Announce completion of TAG work on > Microdata/RDFa as recorded in > [48]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/htmldata.html and to > finalize the product page and associated links due date now > 2012-04-17 > > [48] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/htmldata.html > > JT: feedback is good, will need to come back to it once we have > RECs > > NM: from TAG POV we can say our work is done > > <noah> ACTION-617? > > <trackbot> ACTION-617 -- Noah Mendelsohn to work with Yves to > take [49]http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-namespaceState-20060329/ > off the Rec track -- due 2012-01-31 -- OPEN > > [49] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-namespaceState-20060329/ > > <trackbot> > [50]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/617 > > [50] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/617 > > YL: you mean publishing a note? > ... what do you want to do with the content? > > NM: leave it as a draft finding, or move it to note > > YL: it can't be more than a draft finding, it was a WD > ... we can keep as draft and decide if we drop it later > > <Zakim> ht, you wanted to say we will _have_ to come back to > this > > HT: we'll have to come back to this, > ... there's been some rethinking around schema namespace > documents > ... this interacts heavily with fragIDs and media types > ... so we'll have to revisit > > <noah> Adding a note to the action document saying: Henry notes > on 15 March 2012 that we will>have< to come back to this in > the context of discussing XML Schema namespace document, > > NM: should we do the clerical work to take the old thing off > the Rec track in the meantime > > YL: I don't think that's necessary > > <noah> ACTION-617? > > <trackbot> ACTION-617 -- Yves Lafon to work with Noah to take > [51]http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-namespaceState-20060329/ off > the Rec track -- due 2012-06-01 -- OPEN > > [51] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-namespaceState-20060329/ > > <trackbot> > [52]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/617 > > [52] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/617 > > <noah> ACTION-610? > > <trackbot> ACTION-610 -- Jeni Tennison to draft initial cut at > [53]http://www.w3.org/standards/webarch/metaformats -- due > 2012-03-13 -- OPEN > > [53] http://www.w3.org/standards/webarch/metaformats > > <trackbot> > [54]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/610 > > [54] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/610 > > JT: bit from JAR, bit from HT, will put together so can put a > draft together > ... don't think we need to discuss at f2f > > <Larry> ship it > > JAR: why not have JT send it off and be done with it > > +1 ship it > > <Larry> close the action > > <Ashok> Ship it! > > <noah> ACTION-610 Due 2012-03-27 > > <trackbot> ACTION-610 Draft initial cut at > [55]http://www.w3.org/standards/webarch/metaformats due date > now 2012-03-27 > > [55] http://www.w3.org/standards/webarch/metaformats > > <noah> ACTION-541? > > <trackbot> ACTION-541 -- Jeni Tennison to helped by DKA to > produce draft on technical issues relating to copyright/linking > -- due 2012-02-21 -- OPEN > > <trackbot> > [56]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/541 > > [56] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/541 > > <noah> ACTION-541 Due 2012-04-06 > > <trackbot> ACTION-541 Helped by DKA to produce draft on > technical issues relating to copyright/linking due date now > 2012-04-06 > > NM: we've reached the end! > > <noah> ACTION-636? > > <trackbot> ACTION-636 -- Larry Masinter to update product page > for Mime and the Web -- due 2012-02-11 -- OPEN > > <trackbot> > [57]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/636 > > [57] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/636 > > NM: want me to pick this up from you? > > LM: yup > > <noah> ACTION-636? > > <trackbot> ACTION-636 -- Noah Mendelsohn to update product page > for Mime and the Web -- due 2012-02-11 -- OPEN > > <trackbot> > [58]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/636 > > [58] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/636 > > NM: will do! > > <noah> ACTION-636? > > <trackbot> ACTION-636 -- Noah Mendelsohn to update product page > for Mime and the Web -- due 2012-03-27 -- OPEN > > <trackbot> > [59]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/636 > > [59] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/636 > > [ADJOURNED] > > Summary of Action Items > > [NEW] ACTION: Noah to contact HTML WG co-chairs to ask about > timing for output of Encrypted Media TF > [NEW] ACTION: Robin to ask Dom if there's something he think > would be worth discussing with the TAG > > [End of minutes] > __________________________________________________________ > > > Minutes formatted by David Booth's [60]scribe.perl version > 1.136 ([61]CVS log) > $Date: 2012/03/27 12:44:55 $ > > [60] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm > [61] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/ > >
Received on Tuesday, 27 March 2012 13:10:38 UTC