- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 16:03:35 -0500
- To: www-tag@w3.org
- Message-ID: <4F5135A7.5010004@openlinksw.com>
On 3/2/12 11:20 AM, Jonathan A Rees wrote: > Roy Fielding, for example, would > say (I think) that the URI "means" or "identifies" some resource, not > any particular HTTP behavior. Hmm.. You mean he mean't a URL identifies some resource location since a generic URI can identify anything, which may include a resource location. "Resource" (in the context of the Web mediu) is a network addressable and accessible file. We really have to drop this overloaded use of "Resource" since it only feeds the flames of confusion. My physical embodiment might be construed as a "Resource" but that is not of the Web medium. So we should clearly understand by now that statements such as "everything on the Web is a Resource" means just that: all Web addressable artifacts are Resources. None of that means that "I" the subject of a descriptor (in RDF or any other format) is a "Web Resource". At the same time, when constructing said "Web Resource" can Identify me (the Subject) using via generic HTTP URI -- be it hash or slash (with 303 rule in effect) based. Why are we still struggling with the following: 1. http://twitpic.com/5m2pp9 -- where s/URI/URL would make matters much clearer re. Roy's comments. 2. http://twitpic.com/5m2lu5 -- about generic URIs that identify anything . -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder& CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Friday, 2 March 2012 21:04:01 UTC