- From: トーレ エリクソン <tore.eriksson@po.rd.taisho.co.jp>
- Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:48:03 +0900
- To: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org
Hi David, Although we differ on the point of Information Resources (surprise, surprise), I think your proposal is quite similar to mine. I'd like you to clarify one difference though. In section 3.23 you require @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . <http://example/toucan> rdfs:isDefinedBy <http://example/toucan> . Why can't the representation be a URI definition even without this statement? It seems to me that it being served as a 200 should be enough to be sure of its validity. Regards, Tore Eriksson (Sorry, resending since I forgot to cc the list) _______________________________________________________________ _:this dc:creator [ foaf:name "Tore Eriksson", "トーレ エリクソン"@jp; foaf:mbox_sha1sum "2bd9291b301f112775e118f96eb63314594b1a86"; foaf:workplaceHomepage <http://www.taisho.co.jp/> ].
Received on Monday, 26 March 2012 07:48:37 UTC