- From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
- Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 10:45:27 -0500
- To: Christopher Gutteridge <cjg@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Cc: Graham Klyne <graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk>, www-tag@w3.org
See also "Converting New URI Schemes or URN Sub-Schemes to HTTP", which shows how the same thing can be accomplished with specialized http URI prefixes, without requiring browsers to be changed in order to resolve them: http://dbooth.org/2006/urn2http/ David On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 20:36 +0000, Christopher Gutteridge wrote: > I doubted I was the first to suggest something like it. A quick look at > tdb: and yes, it's pretty much exactly the same idea I was suggesting. > > Having tried to explain RDF to many programmers at hack days etc. having > URIs for real-world things start with http: is a hurdle to them > understanding what's going on. > > Thanks Graham. > > > On 04/03/2012 18:58, Graham Klyne wrote: > > Hi Chris, > > > > Your infra: looks a bit like tdb: [1]. I believe Larry's currently > > aiming for "experimental" publication so folks can reasonably try it > > out on the open web. > > > > #g > > -- > > > > [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-masinter-dated-uri-10 > > > > > > On 04/03/2012 17:37, Christopher Gutteridge wrote: > >> > >> I've started sketching some ideas I've been thinking about for some > >> time into a > >> blog post; > >> http://blogs.ecs.soton.ac.uk/webteam/2012/03/01/firing-range-14/ > >> > >> I can turn it into something more formal if there's any positive > >> feedback. > >> > > > -- David Booth, Ph.D. http://dbooth.org/ Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of his employer.
Received on Wednesday, 7 March 2012 15:45:52 UTC