Re: httpRange-14 Change Proposal

On 3/29/12 8:08 AM, Jeni Tennison wrote:
> Nathan,
>
> On 29 Mar 2012, at 12:48, Nathan wrote:
>> You can think of the term "Resource" as being namespaced within each specification, RFC3986-Resource is not equivalent to HTTPbis-Resource. Indeed it's this ambiguity in terminology which creates most of the mess around httpRange-14.
> Could you please point me to the part of HTTPbis that defines "resource" (ie HTTPbis-Resource)? I understand that HTTPbis only talks about resources that are identified through HTTP URIs, but I can't find the part of the specification that defines "resource" such that I (a Person) am not an HTTPbis resource.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jeni
It think its clear to everyone that you are not a Web realm resource. A 
descriptive representation of you can take the form of a Web realm 
resource.

Are the specs at fault for be being presumptuous about the intuitions of 
Web users and developers? Maybe :-)

-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
Founder&  CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen