- From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
- Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 12:53:43 -0400
- To: www-tag@w3.org
On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 14:28 -0500, David Booth wrote: > I find the document at > http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/uddp-20120229/ > to be hard to read, overly broad, unproductively pedantic and > unnecessarily entangling philosophical questions with simple matters of > protocol design. > > As an alternate proposal, I have started a significantly simplified > document on the W3C wiki at > http://www.w3.org/wiki/UriDefinitionDiscoveryProtocol Any other comments or suggestions, before I submit this? Notably this document: - describes an explicit protocol for obtaining a URI owner's URI definition, based on existing practice; - focuses on the mechanics of conveying a URI definition, and leaves the meaning of that definition out of scope; and - focuses specifically on "http" (and "https") URIs, because this is the case that is most relevant to practitioners and the case the httpRange-14 addressed. -- David Booth, Ph.D. http://dbooth.org/ Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of his employer.
Received on Thursday, 15 March 2012 16:54:14 UTC