Re: Proposal to amend the httpRange-14 resolution

I accidently moved the discussion off-line, sorry about that.

> I wasn't trying to argue the merits of the proposal (as Tim did, which
> is fine), I was just trying to make sure I understood it. And it
> sounds like what I thought was true, which is that it would deprecate
> huge amounts of deployed RDF, and incompatibly change previously
> provided advice. That's coherent, and it's fine to propose (the same
> objection has been raised before, so you're not alone), but in my
> opinion any proposal that would do this ought to be transparent and
> list such a consequence under "negative effects" or "risks".

I concur that previous advice has to be changed and I'll add this as a
negative effect. I don't think deployed RDF will break though. That
discussion continues in a separate thread:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2012Mar/0120.html

Tore

_______________________________________________________________
Tore Eriksson [tore.eriksson at po.rd.taisho.co.jp]

Received on Tuesday, 27 March 2012 01:22:09 UTC