- From: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 14:47:54 +0200
- To: "www-tag@w3.org List" <www-tag@w3.org>
They are available (as draft) at http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/03/15-minutes.html.
Sorry for the delay.
Text follows.
===
[1]W3C
[1] http://www.w3.org/
- DRAFT -
TAG
15 Mar 2012
[2]Agenda
[2] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/04/02-agenda
Attendees
Present
AM, JT, LM, NM, PL, RB, YL, HT, JAR
Regrets
TBL
Chair
NM
Scribe
Robin Berjon
Contents
* [3]Topics
1. [4]Convene
2. [5]Minutes Approval
3. [6]Administrative items
4. [7]IETF Paris Meeting
5. [8]F2F Planning
6. [9]HTML.next
7. [10]<scribe> Topic: Web Application Storage
8. [11]Pending Review Items
9. [12]Overdue actions
* [13]Summary of Action Items
__________________________________________________________
<JeniT> ScribeNick: darobin
<scribe> Scribe: Robin Berjon
Date: 15 Mar 2012
Convene
NM: regrets next week?
RB: yes, I'm in China
NM: probable cancellation on the 29th, but we'll see later
Minutes Approval
<noah> [14]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/03/08-minutes.html
[14] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/03/08-minutes.html
RESOLUTION: minutes 20120308 approved
Administrative items
NM summarises agenda
NM: we'll look at the f2f agenda and revisit if needed
ACTION-641?
<trackbot> ACTION-641 -- Noah Mendelsohn to try and find list
of review issues relating to HTML5 from earlier discussions --
due 2012-03-01 -- PENDINGREVIEW
<trackbot>
[15]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/641
[15] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/641
NM: Larry suggested finding priority list, in the meantime we
more or less decided not to do HTML.next
... Robin, how confident about API Privacy?
RB: 10 days earlier?
NM: not hard, but earlier is useful
RB: I'll have it done
NM: logistics?
... agenda still rough, will take shape based on advice today
... looking for guidance on http+aes
LM: i think things have moved on and that it isn't we shouldn't
bother talking about it
... -1
JT: didn't we discuss this last week and say yes we should talk
about it
NM: won't go into details, but question is: should we schedule
a session on this?
JT: what's happened, Larry?
LM: there's an encrypted media task force
NM: JAR talking about are there different classes of URIs,
public and private, HT sems to be on side of thinking this is a
bad idea
HT: willing to be educated!
NM: so, that's a maybe
JT: the minutes last week say that NM would schedule a
discussion this week
LM: there's an encrypted media TF
NM: when do they report?
LM: I don't know; there was a serious proposal from MS, Google,
and Cable Labs about this
NM: IETF?
LM: no, this is in HTML WG
HT: suggest you contact the co-chairs and ask what they expect
in terms of timing
<scribe> ACTION: Noah to contact HTML WG co-chairs to ask about
timing for output of Encrypted Media TF
<trackbot> Created ACTION-677 - Contact HTML WG co-chairs to
ask about timing for output of Encrypted Media TF [on Noah
Mendelsohn - due 2012-03-22].
<noah> . ACTION: Noah to contact HTML WG chairs to get advice
on likely trajectory of work on encryted media
<noah> ACTION-677 Due 2012-03-24
<trackbot> ACTION-677 Contact HTML WG co-chairs to ask about
timing for output of Encrypted Media TF due date now 2012-03-24
NM: any other admin?
[nope]
IETF Paris Meeting
NM: need for further work?
YL: Larry will be around, Robin can be around as needed
... will contact the AD of app area for a meeting
... I will do this shortly
... expect a meeting at the beginning of the week to discuss
what we're doing
LM: another thing that's relevant for TAG is HTTP WG, SPDY,
HTTP2
YL: that's on Thu; there's also Mon for HTTPbis
LM: IRI working group will meet, there's been a lot of progress
... Websec meets, of course, and is center of work on web
security, CORS, etc.
YL: there are other things around privacy that may be of
interest to people, plus general discussion, coordination
LM: applications area directorate (HT is member) usually meets
YL: PLH and TLR will be there, and MarkN
LM: apps area working group will take up MIME registry update
YL: lots of opportunities for impromptu meetings, just need to
find slots to make interesting to everybody
... [16]https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/83/agenda.html
[16] https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/83/agenda.html
LM: worthwhile reviewing document on MIME registry
... lots of progress on IRI
... involvement from I18N WG reviewing the document
... Web Security group meets, things to do there
YL: apps-area, websec (monday)
LM: as well of course as RTCWeb
YL: good summary of the most interesting stuff for us
LM: MarkN has written an ID capturing the work on discussing
registries in general, fixing IANA
... there should be good discussion of that
YL: I don't think there's anything schedule for that
LM: yes, MarkN said he was trying to schedule an impromptu on
this
<Zakim> jar, you wanted to raise his very annoying HTTP
question
JAR: want to get a volunteer for my question to the HTTP WG
<Yves>
[17]https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-appsawg-happia
na-00
[17] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-appsawg-happiana-00
JAR: not discuss now, just looking for volunteer
<noah> JAR: Question is whether "representation" is used as a
term of art, or more informally
JAR: YL are you volunteering to understand my question?
YL: I'll try to convey, understanding is another problem :)
<Larry>
[18]http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-appsawg-happian
a-00
[18] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-appsawg-happiana-00
<jar> I sent the question on Feb 7 to httpbis
<jar> will dig up pointer
YL: given a pointer, I can more easily raise it
JAR: will dig it up
HT: I would encourage you to come up with an example where one
usage applies and another doesn't
... to help them understand what the problem is, why does this
make a difference?
... sort of a minimal pair approach
<jar>
[19]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2012JanMar
/0412.html
[19] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2012JanMar/0412.html
JAR: this might only matter to RDF and they might not care
about RDF
<Larry> " Happy IANA: Making Large-Scale Registries More
User-Friendly"
HT: I don't think that's true
... but you can try something on me before exposing it more
widely
NM: okay for IETF
F2F Planning
<jar> more detail in blog post pointed from
[20]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2012JanMar
/0463.html
[20] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2012JanMar/0463.html
NM: gathered ideas from last week
<noah>
[21]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/03/15-agenda#F2Fplanning
[21] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/03/15-agenda#F2Fplanning
NM: look at "Chair's working list of likely agenda topics"
NM reads from agenda
NM: we might want to get into some of the IETF topics and dig
in, but we'll see based on report
... Chris is coming
... want to look into whether FragID and MIME is still a
priority
... extensive time on Publishing and Linking, maybe careful
walk through
JT: it could be useful if Rigo were there
YL: Rigo is not in Sophia anymore
HT: any communication with Rigo should make clear how long
we're spending on this
<Larry> i don't think meeting with Rigo should be in the
critical path of us making progress on this document
<Larry> if he can meet with us, fine, but let's get on with it
JT: if he happens to be around that would be good, but if not
it doesn't make sense
NM: JAR you're still waiting for feedback on httpRange-14
change proposals
JAR: I don't think we should focus we should focus on the
baseline document
... but we should try to figure out where this is going
NM: see if we can propose a way forward
JAR: even without change, we should figure out what to do with
this
... even if it's say it's not our job
<Ashok> +1 to Jar
NM: I welcome it if you want to lead and sketch out what the
agenda should be for your session
JAR: I'll think hard about how to best make use of the time
<Larry> I'd like a clear option to drop this, I don't think
things are converging
NM: Robin will have a draft on API Privacy
... AM on local storage?
AM: I've written a draft, it's different from the usual stuff,
sent for review to LM and RB to see if it was sensible
<jar> larry, noted
AM: depending on the response, we'll see what discussion there
ought to be
NM: so if people like it, we can make it a major topic, if not
it'll be brief
AM: correct
NM: will be looking at priorities
... would prefer not to burn a lot of time on this
... but have some nervousness that we only have three
priorities
... but we should make sure we're well engaged
... HT mentioned PhiloWeb at WWW2012
... the TAG formally lists issues, are we tracking them,
working on them, etc.
... we should look at the relationship between products and
issues
... ideally, we should have shepherds for issues
... if any of you want to go through issues, see which can be
closed, which are being forgotten about, etc. it would be
useful
... will take suggestions now or offline
JT: Robin mentioned getting Dom to talk to us about mobile
stuff
NM: he lives close?
RB: yes, but we should make sure that we have something useful
to discuss with him
<scribe> ACTION: Robin to ask Dom if there's something he think
would be worth discussing with the TAG
<trackbot> Created ACTION-678 - Ask Dom if there's something he
think would be worth discussing with the TAG [on Robin Berjon -
due 2012-03-22].
<noah> RB: Can Chris Lilley brief us on SVG change to HTML
syntax
NM: we can always change the agenda of course
... please send me the reading list quickly
HTML.next
<noah> ACTION-641?
<trackbot> ACTION-641 -- Noah Mendelsohn to try and find list
of review issues relating to HTML5 from earlier discussions --
due 2012-03-01 -- PENDINGREVIEW
<trackbot>
[22]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/641
[22] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/641
<noah>
[23]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2009/09/HTMLIssuesRevised.pdf
[23] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2009/09/HTMLIssuesRevised.pdf
NM: matrix of issues that we thought we might want to look at
... tentatively agreed not to look into this now
<Larry> at most we should forward the list to the HTML working
group...
NM: question: look through this list, and if anything in this
list makes you feel like we should then raise it
LM: can we ask the list?
NM: the hesitancy is that some of these things might look like
different things to different people
... are you saying someone should send this to the HTML WG?
LM: just a pointer
... looking for ways not to spend too much time
NM: that's fine by me
<Larry> that's ok with me not to spend time on this
NM: not hearing a lot of interest in picking this up
... we can close the action
<noah> close ACTION-641
<trackbot> ACTION-641 Try and find list of review issues
relating to HTML5 from earlier discussions closed
<scribe> Topic: Web Application Storage
NM: AM circulated a draft, people will feed back
AM: yes
Pending Review Items
<noah>
[24]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/pendingrevie
w
[24] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/pendingreview
<noah> ACTION-602?
<trackbot> ACTION-602 -- Noah Mendelsohn to work with IETF
liaisons to propose possible TAG participation in IETF Paris --
due 2012-03-13 -- PENDINGREVIEW
<trackbot>
[25]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/602
[25] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/602
<noah> close ACTION-602
<trackbot> ACTION-602 Work with IETF liaisons to propose
possible TAG participation in IETF Paris closed
<noah> ACTION-662>
<noah> ACTION-662?
<trackbot> ACTION-662 -- Robin Berjon to redraft proposed
product page on API Minimization
([26]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/apiminimization.html)
-- due 2012-01-31 -- PENDINGREVIEW
[26] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/apiminimization.html)
<trackbot>
[27]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/662
[27] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/662
<noah> ACTION-656
<noah> ACTION-656?
<trackbot> ACTION-656 -- Noah Mendelsohn to schedule discussion
of possibly getting W3C to invest in technologies for liberal
XML processing (e.g. XML5) -- due 2012-01-31 -- PENDINGREVIEW
<trackbot>
[28]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/656
[28] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/656
NM: I believe this came out of the discussion with NDW and
HTML/XML TF
... this has already been taken by the XML-ER CG
<noah> [29]http://www.w3.org/community/xml-er/
[29] http://www.w3.org/community/xml-er/
NM: they're doing it. LM are you happy with where this is?
LM: have there been any comments?
NM: there's a mailing list with active discussion
... active discussion and the start of a spec from AnneVK
<Larry> Can we get a summary of the discussion so far?
<Larry> is the SVG in HTML syntax related to this discussion?
NM: some discussion on requirements and use cases, some
browser-related stuff, some HTML-at-front-of-pipeline, some
unification, some database error correction, etc.
... give and take on use cases, though Anne has spec and pieces
of an implementation
<noah> RB: Anne is not disinclined to change if spec really
needs changing
<noah> NM: I meant more that he mostly wants to focus on
user-facing use cases, and is less inclined to change for, e.g.
database back ends
<noah> RB: Right
NM: Anne targeting UCs that he perceives as high priority,
might disagree with some of the other UCs
<noah> RB: And others agree
<ht> I predict TBL will push back on "not punishing users". . .
<Zakim> ht, you wanted to request discussion about goals and
use cases at F2F
HT: I think it's worth talking about this, if there's room
... we should think about whether we're happy with the goals of
this TF and if we should try to influence them
LM: would you make a proposal?
HT: no, I want to have some time to think about this
<noah> Adding this note to ACTION-656:
<noah> Per HT request on 15 March 2012, I think we should
discuss whether we think XML-ER is adopting the right goals and
use cases. At F2F if it fits.
HT: if we have any love in our heart of Tim's suggestion to
encourage better markup, I'd like to know
<Larry> I'd like to hear some strawman proposals so that we
don't go in circles on "Yes, it's a hard problem"
<noah> LM: Encourage Henry to come up with "strawman"
proposals. Even something to knock down.
NM: HT, where are we standing on polyglot?
HT: issue about BOMs, and another issue XML Core WG is still
working on
NM: wondering if mixing with XML ER is a good idae
HT: probably not
<Larry> I had another category that wasn't "polyglot" I was
calling "Multi-view": single content stream that can be viewed
as two different types, but mean DIFFERENT but related things
<noah>
[30]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/overdue?sort
=owner
[30] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/overdue?sort=owner
Overdue actions
<noah> ACTION-669?
<trackbot> ACTION-669 -- Henry Thompson to review
[31]http://www.w3.org/TR/qaframe-spec/#ref-define-practice and
see whether TAG needs to do more on references to evolving
specs Due: 2012-08-01 -- due 2012-02-09 -- OPEN
[31] http://www.w3.org/TR/qaframe-spec/#ref-define-practice
<trackbot>
[32]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/669
[32] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/669
<noah> ACTION-628?
<trackbot> ACTION-628 -- Henry Thompson to work with Chris
Lilley to bring forward prose for 3023bis wrt generic
processing of fragment identifiers which addresses the rdf+xml
and xhtml+xml issues -- due 2012-02-14 -- OPEN
<trackbot>
[33]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/628
[33] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/628
<noah> Henry to bump dates on all actions.
<noah> ACTION-572?
<trackbot> ACTION-572 -- Yves Lafon to look at appcache in
HTML5 -- due 2012-03-06 -- OPEN
<trackbot>
[34]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/572
[34] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/572
<JeniT> ScribeNick: JeniT
NM: Do we need to talk about this at F2F? Is it combined with
web storage?
YL: I think my action is to see whether appcache fits with AM's
work on web storage
<darobin> ScribeNick: darobin
<noah> close ACTION-572
<trackbot> ACTION-572 Look at appcache in HTML5 closed
<JeniT> ScribeNick: darobin
YL: check if appcache feeds into AM's document on local storage
<noah> ACTION Yves to check how Appcache should fit into
Ashok's storage document - Due 2012-04-02
<trackbot> Created ACTION-679 - check how Appcache should fit
into Ashok's storage document [on Yves Lafon - due 2012-04-02].
<noah> ACTION-566?
<trackbot> ACTION-566 -- Yves Lafon to investigate possible
liaison or meeting with IETF (maybe IAB) on privacy -- due
2012-01-24 -- OPEN
<trackbot>
[35]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/566
[35] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/566
NM: seems relevant given Paris
YL: I know that Wendy(?) will be there, working on privacy
don't know if we want to track that
NM: we can close, depends on if the group wants to work on this
YL: liaising is a good thing, not sure if it should be only
about privacy
<noah> close ACTION-566
<trackbot> ACTION-566 Investigate possible liaison or meeting
with IETF (maybe IAB) on privacy closed
<noah> ACTION-638
<noah> ACTION-638?
<trackbot> ACTION-638 -- Yves Lafon to help Noah figure out
best ways, if at all, for TAG to participate in IETF paris --
due 2012-02-15 -- OPEN
<trackbot>
[36]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/638
[36] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/638
<noah> ACTION-638 Due 2012-03-26
<trackbot> ACTION-638 Help Noah figure out best ways, if at
all, for TAG to participate in IETF paris due date now
2012-03-26
<noah> ACTION-594?
<trackbot> ACTION-594 -- Yves Lafon to with Peter and Henry
produce partial revision of fragment id finding -- due
2012-03-13 -- OPEN
<trackbot>
[37]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/594
[37] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/594
NM: seems not to be moving. Thoughts?
<Larry> suggest reviewing
[38]http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-appsawg-media-type-re
gs-03
[38] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-appsawg-media-type-regs-03
<noah> Suggest we discuss priority of fragids at F2F
<Larry> "Media Type Specifications and Registration Procedures"
NM: we'll settle that at the f2f
LM: (XXX?) document being revised
NM: better path forward?
LM: possibly
NM: we can discuss the priority at the f2f
<noah> ACTION-606?
<trackbot> ACTION-606 -- Peter Linss to invite I18N and other
concerned groups to provide written technical input as prep to
discussion with the TAG regarding unicode normalization -- due
2012-03-06 -- OPEN
<trackbot>
[39]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/606
[39] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/606
PL: still interest in doing this
<noah> ACTION-606 Due 2012-05-01
<trackbot> ACTION-606 Invite I18N and other concerned groups to
provide written technical input as prep to discussion with the
TAG regarding unicode normalization due date now 2012-05-01
<noah> ACTION-611?
<trackbot> ACTION-611 -- Larry Masinter to draft initial cut at
[40]http://www.w3.org/standards/webarch/protocols -- due
2012-02-17 -- OPEN
[40] http://www.w3.org/standards/webarch/protocols
<trackbot>
[41]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/611
[41] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/611
NM: nothing says relaxing on your vacation like drafting TAG
pages!
<noah> ACTION-611 Due 2012-05
<trackbot> ACTION-611 Draft initial cut at
[42]http://www.w3.org/standards/webarch/protocols due date now
2012-05
[42] http://www.w3.org/standards/webarch/protocols
<noah> Actually, I said: Nothing makes a relaxing vacation like
drafting architecture pages
LM: rethinking the priorities on these
... any opinions? might drop it
NM: it's a good thing for the TAG to contribute to these pages,
but only so far I want to push people. Jeni did a great job,
but if other people are not doing actions we should close them
<noah> close ACTION-611
<trackbot> ACTION-611 Draft initial cut at
[43]http://www.w3.org/standards/webarch/protocols closed
[43] http://www.w3.org/standards/webarch/protocols
<noah> ACTION-670?
<trackbot> ACTION-670 -- Noah Mendelsohn to update product
priority list to mark MIMEWeb completed after final product
page available -- due 2012-03-01 -- OPEN
<trackbot>
[44]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/670
[44] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/670
<Larry> if Ian wants us to help out with these, he can ask us
to re-open
NM: note the closing of these efforts in the product page
<noah> ACTION-670 Due 2012-05-01
<trackbot> ACTION-670 Update product priority list to mark
MIMEWeb completed after final product page available due date
now 2012-05-01
<Larry> mnot's draft and media type drafts are new since we
last talked about this
<noah> ACTION-657?
<trackbot> ACTION-657 -- Noah Mendelsohn to schedule telcon
discussion of possible XML/HTML Unification next steps -- due
2012-03-06 -- OPEN
<trackbot>
[45]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/657
[45] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/657
NM: asked NDW if he had reactions
<noah> ACTION-657 Due 2012-04-10
<trackbot> ACTION-657 Schedule telcon discussion of possible
XML/HTML Unification next steps due date now 2012-04-10
<noah> ACTION-664?
<trackbot> ACTION-664 -- Noah Mendelsohn to announce completion
of TAG work on Microdata/RDFa as recorded in
[46]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/htmldata.html and to
finalize the product page and associated links -- due
2012-01-26 -- OPEN
[46] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/htmldata.html
<trackbot>
[47]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/664
[47] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/664
<noah> ACTION-664 Due 2012-04-17
<trackbot> ACTION-664 Announce completion of TAG work on
Microdata/RDFa as recorded in
[48]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/htmldata.html and to
finalize the product page and associated links due date now
2012-04-17
[48] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/htmldata.html
JT: feedback is good, will need to come back to it once we have
RECs
NM: from TAG POV we can say our work is done
<noah> ACTION-617?
<trackbot> ACTION-617 -- Noah Mendelsohn to work with Yves to
take [49]http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-namespaceState-20060329/
off the Rec track -- due 2012-01-31 -- OPEN
[49] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-namespaceState-20060329/
<trackbot>
[50]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/617
[50] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/617
YL: you mean publishing a note?
... what do you want to do with the content?
NM: leave it as a draft finding, or move it to note
YL: it can't be more than a draft finding, it was a WD
... we can keep as draft and decide if we drop it later
<Zakim> ht, you wanted to say we will _have_ to come back to
this
HT: we'll have to come back to this,
... there's been some rethinking around schema namespace
documents
... this interacts heavily with fragIDs and media types
... so we'll have to revisit
<noah> Adding a note to the action document saying: Henry notes
on 15 March 2012 that we will >have< to come back to this in
the context of discussing XML Schema namespace document,
NM: should we do the clerical work to take the old thing off
the Rec track in the meantime
YL: I don't think that's necessary
<noah> ACTION-617?
<trackbot> ACTION-617 -- Yves Lafon to work with Noah to take
[51]http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-namespaceState-20060329/ off
the Rec track -- due 2012-06-01 -- OPEN
[51] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-namespaceState-20060329/
<trackbot>
[52]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/617
[52] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/617
<noah> ACTION-610?
<trackbot> ACTION-610 -- Jeni Tennison to draft initial cut at
[53]http://www.w3.org/standards/webarch/metaformats -- due
2012-03-13 -- OPEN
[53] http://www.w3.org/standards/webarch/metaformats
<trackbot>
[54]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/610
[54] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/610
JT: bit from JAR, bit from HT, will put together so can put a
draft together
... don't think we need to discuss at f2f
<Larry> ship it
JAR: why not have JT send it off and be done with it
+1 ship it
<Larry> close the action
<Ashok> Ship it!
<noah> ACTION-610 Due 2012-03-27
<trackbot> ACTION-610 Draft initial cut at
[55]http://www.w3.org/standards/webarch/metaformats due date
now 2012-03-27
[55] http://www.w3.org/standards/webarch/metaformats
<noah> ACTION-541?
<trackbot> ACTION-541 -- Jeni Tennison to helped by DKA to
produce draft on technical issues relating to copyright/linking
-- due 2012-02-21 -- OPEN
<trackbot>
[56]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/541
[56] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/541
<noah> ACTION-541 Due 2012-04-06
<trackbot> ACTION-541 Helped by DKA to produce draft on
technical issues relating to copyright/linking due date now
2012-04-06
NM: we've reached the end!
<noah> ACTION-636?
<trackbot> ACTION-636 -- Larry Masinter to update product page
for Mime and the Web -- due 2012-02-11 -- OPEN
<trackbot>
[57]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/636
[57] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/636
NM: want me to pick this up from you?
LM: yup
<noah> ACTION-636?
<trackbot> ACTION-636 -- Noah Mendelsohn to update product page
for Mime and the Web -- due 2012-02-11 -- OPEN
<trackbot>
[58]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/636
[58] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/636
NM: will do!
<noah> ACTION-636?
<trackbot> ACTION-636 -- Noah Mendelsohn to update product page
for Mime and the Web -- due 2012-03-27 -- OPEN
<trackbot>
[59]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/636
[59] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/636
[ADJOURNED]
Summary of Action Items
[NEW] ACTION: Noah to contact HTML WG co-chairs to ask about
timing for output of Encrypted Media TF
[NEW] ACTION: Robin to ask Dom if there's something he think
would be worth discussing with the TAG
[End of minutes]
__________________________________________________________
Minutes formatted by David Booth's [60]scribe.perl version
1.136 ([61]CVS log)
$Date: 2012/03/27 12:44:55 $
[60] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
[61] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
--
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Tuesday, 27 March 2012 12:48:25 UTC