Re: URIs, used in RDF, that do not have associated documentation

On Mar 28, 2012, at 4:44 AM, トーレ エリクソン wrote:

> I know it is a radical change, but this is what I am proposing. Many
> other people have propose versions of this position during the years,
> but it has never stuck. Apparently the point is hard to get across; even
> if you write it out in prose, people assume that you meant something
> else... I hope you understand what I'm trying to say now, and any advice
> on how to formulate this more clearly would be much appreciated.

There is no spoon.


Received on Wednesday, 28 March 2012 12:44:33 UTC