W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > March 2012

Re: httpRange-14 Change Proposal [editorial tweaks]

From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 10:40:22 -0400
Message-ID: <4F747456.3030000@openlinksw.com>
To: www-tag@w3.org
On 3/29/12 10:18 AM, David Booth wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-03-29 at 15:05 +0200, Danny Ayers wrote:
> [ . . . ]
>> Also talking about a "probe URI" seems misleading, taken literally it
>> implies every request for data should be preceded by a request for
>> metadata.
> Agreed, and a hash URI stem#fragID is not "probed" at all, since only
> the stem URI is used in making a request.  That's why the term "target
> URI" is used instead in the "URI Definition Discovery Protocol"
> proposal:
> http://www.w3.org/wiki/UriDefinitionDiscoveryProtocol#2.2_Target_URI.2C_hash_target_URI.2C_hashless_target_URI

Stem, Probe etc..

What happened to URIs simply being URIs as per URI abstraction? These 
labels aren't solving anything. These new labels are akin to relabeling 
a predicate and hoping if fixes the effective semantics of a relation :-)



Kingsley Idehen	
Founder&  CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen

Received on Thursday, 29 March 2012 14:40:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:56:43 UTC