- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 10:40:22 -0400
- To: www-tag@w3.org
- Message-ID: <4F747456.3030000@openlinksw.com>
On 3/29/12 10:18 AM, David Booth wrote: > On Thu, 2012-03-29 at 15:05 +0200, Danny Ayers wrote: > [ . . . ] >> Also talking about a "probe URI" seems misleading, taken literally it >> implies every request for data should be preceded by a request for >> metadata. > Agreed, and a hash URI stem#fragID is not "probed" at all, since only > the stem URI is used in making a request. That's why the term "target > URI" is used instead in the "URI Definition Discovery Protocol" > proposal: > http://www.w3.org/wiki/UriDefinitionDiscoveryProtocol#2.2_Target_URI.2C_hash_target_URI.2C_hashless_target_URI > > Stem, Probe etc.. What happened to URIs simply being URIs as per URI abstraction? These labels aren't solving anything. These new labels are akin to relabeling a predicate and hoping if fixes the effective semantics of a relation :-) -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder& CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Thursday, 29 March 2012 14:40:49 UTC