On 3/29/12 10:18 AM, David Booth wrote: > On Thu, 2012-03-29 at 15:05 +0200, Danny Ayers wrote: > [ . . . ] >> Also talking about a "probe URI" seems misleading, taken literally it >> implies every request for data should be preceded by a request for >> metadata. > Agreed, and a hash URI stem#fragID is not "probed" at all, since only > the stem URI is used in making a request. That's why the term "target > URI" is used instead in the "URI Definition Discovery Protocol" > proposal: > http://www.w3.org/wiki/UriDefinitionDiscoveryProtocol#2.2_Target_URI.2C_hash_target_URI.2C_hashless_target_URI > > Stem, Probe etc.. What happened to URIs simply being URIs as per URI abstraction? These labels aren't solving anything. These new labels are akin to relabeling a predicate and hoping if fixes the effective semantics of a relation :-) -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder& CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:56:43 UTC