- From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
- Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 13:13:47 -0400
- To: トーレ エリクソン <tore.eriksson@po.rd.taisho.co.jp>
- Cc: nathan@webr3.org, www-tag@w3.org, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>, public-lod@w3.org
On Thu, 2012-03-29 at 11:55 +0900, トーレ エリクソン wrote: [ . . . ] > If we agree that > > _:a a rdfs:Class; > rdfs:comment "the set of things which can have > their representations retrieved via HTTP"; > owl:equivalentClass rdfs:Resource. > > the interface between the web and the semantic web becomes much easier > to understand. +1 . . . almost. Except that I think you should remove the owl:equivalentClass assertion, so that it is not *always* the same set as rdf:Resource in *all* uses: _:a a rdfs:Class; rdfs:comment """The set of things which can have their representations retrieved via HTTP. Initially this is the same set as rdfs:Resource. However, some applications may choose to additionally constrain this set.""" . -- David Booth, Ph.D. http://dbooth.org/ Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of his employer.
Received on Thursday, 29 March 2012 17:14:12 UTC