w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org from February 2002: by date

Thursday, 28 February 2002
- Re: a few questions about literals Jos De_Roo
- Re: a few questions about literals Dan Connolly
Wednesday, 27 February 2002
- a few questions about literals Pat Hayes
Thursday, 28 February 2002
- Re: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-xmllang Brian McBride
- Re: possible way out of maze? [was: Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ]] Brian McBride
- Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Brian McBride
- Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Brian McBride
Wednesday, 27 February 2002
- Re: the S-B problem and what to do about it. Brian McBride
- Fwd: Addition to Pubrules: New Pubrules Checker Available Brian McBride
- RE: possible way out of maze? [was: Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ]] Bill de hÓra
- RE: possible way out of maze? [was: Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstan ding Issues ]] Ronald Daniel
- Re: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-xmllang John Cowan
- Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Jos De_Roo
- Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Pat Hayes
- possible way out of maze? [was: Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ]] Pat Hayes
- Datatyping "code" for testing and consideration Patrick Stickler
- Re: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-xmllang Martin Duerst
- Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Dan Connolly
- Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Pat Hayes
- Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Pat Hayes
- Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Pat Hayes
- Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Pat Hayes
Tuesday, 26 February 2002
- Datatyping Ontology Mike Dean
- Minutes for 2002-02-22 RDF Core Telecon Aaron Swartz
Monday, 25 February 2002
- Adding lrange to the recent proposal (was: Re: the S-B problem and what to do about it.) Pat Hayes
- Re: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-xmllang Mark Davis
- Re: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-xmllang John Cowan
- Re: the S-B problem and what to do about it. Patrick Stickler
- RE: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-xmllang Pat Hayes
- RE: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-xmllang Misha.Wolf@reuters.com
- RE: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-xmllang Misha.Wolf@reuters.com
Sunday, 24 February 2002
- RE: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-xmllang Pat Hayes
- Re: Datatypes: unhappy of Bristol Pat Hayes
- revised datatyping proposal, now twopence colored Pat Hayes
- Re: the S-B problem and what to do about it. Aaron Swartz
- the S-B problem and what to do about it. Pat Hayes
- revised datatyping proposal Pat Hayes
- Some experimental CWM rules for datatyping idioms Patrick Stickler
- Re: Datatypes: unhappy of Bristol Brian McBride
- RE: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-xmllang Brian McBride
Saturday, 23 February 2002
- RE: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-xmllang Misha.Wolf@reuters.com
- Re: "Datatyping for Dummies" (or Occam's Razor Slash Fest) Patrick Stickler
- Four thousand words on datatyping... Patrick Stickler
- Re: Datatypes: unhappy of Bristol Jos De_Roo
- Datatypes: unhappy of Bristol Jeremy Carroll
- RE: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-xmllang Jeremy Carroll
Friday, 22 February 2002
- RE: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-xmllang Misha.Wolf@reuters.com
- Re: dizzying datatypes discussions [was: Occam-slashed datatypes] Pat Hayes
- Re: Occam-slashed datatypes Pat Hayes
- Re: Occam-slashed datatypes Pat Hayes
- Re: simplified datatyping proposal Pat Hayes
- Re: telecon at the f2f Eric Miller
- Re: "Datatyping for Dummies" (or Occam's Razor Slash Fest) Pat Hayes
- RE: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-xmllang Jeremy Carroll
- RE: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-xmllang Jeremy Carroll
- Re: Test cases (entailment) ... Was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-22 Brian McBride
- Re: Occam-slashed datatypes Patrick Stickler
- Test cases (entailment) ... Was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-22 Jan Grant
- Re: Occam-slashed datatypes Sergey Melnik
- Re: Occam-slashed datatypes Patrick Stickler
- Re: Occam-slashed datatypes Patrick Stickler
- Re: "Datatyping for Dummies" (or Occam's Razor Slash Fest) Patrick Stickler
- Re: simplified datatyping proposal Patrick Stickler
- Re: simplified datatyping proposal Patrick Stickler
- Re: telecon at the f2f Aaron Swartz
- Occam-slashed datatypes Pat Hayes
- Re: Even more simplified datatyping proposal Pat Hayes
- Re: simplified datatyping proposal Jos De_Roo
- Re: simplified datatyping proposal Jos De_Roo
- Re: simplified datatyping proposal Pat Hayes
Thursday, 21 February 2002
- Re: "Datatyping for Dummies" (or Occam's Razor Slash Fest) Pat Hayes
- Re: simplified datatyping proposal Pat Hayes
- Re: Subtler simplified datatypes. Pat Hayes
- Re: simplified datatyping proposal Pat Hayes
- Re: simplified datatyping proposal Pat Hayes
- Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-22 bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
- Re: simplified datatyping proposal Jeremy Carroll
- Re: telecon at the f2f Frank Manola
- RE: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-xmllang Misha.Wolf@reuters.com
- Re: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-xmllang Dave Beckett
- RE: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-xmllang Brian McBride
- Re: "Datatyping for Dummies" answers to quiz Patrick Stickler
- RE: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-xmllang Misha.Wolf@reuters.com
- Re: simplified datatyping proposal Graham Klyne
- "Datatyping for Dummies" answers to quiz Patrick Stickler
- "Datatyping for Dummies" (or Occam's Razor Slash Fest) Patrick Stickler
- Re: Subtler simplified datatypes. Patrick Stickler
- FW: Even more simplified datatyping proposal Patrick Stickler
- FW: Even more simplified datatyping proposal Patrick Stickler
- FW: Even more simplified datatyping proposal Patrick Stickler
- Re: Subtler simplified datatypes. Patrick Stickler
- Re: simplified datatyping proposal Patrick Stickler
- Re: simplified datatyping proposal Patrick Stickler
- Re: simplified datatyping proposal Patrick Stickler
- around and around and around the table [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Pat Hayes
- Re: simplified datatyping proposal Pat Hayes
- Re: simplified datatyping proposal Pat Hayes
- Re: Subtler simplified datatypes. Pat Hayes
- Re: weekly call for agenda items Frank Manola
- Re: weekly call for agenda items Frank Manola
Wednesday, 20 February 2002
- Re: simplified datatyping proposal Jos De_Roo
- Re: simplified datatyping proposal Graham Klyne
- Re: simplified datatyping proposal Graham Klyne
- Re: simplified datatyping proposal Graham Klyne
- answers to quiz (was: Re: simplified datatyping proposal) Pat Hayes
- Subtler simplified datatypes. Pat Hayes
- Re: simplified datatyping proposal Pat Hayes
- Re: weekly call for agenda items Pat Hayes
- Re: weekly call for agenda items Pat Hayes
- Re: Concerns about reification Pat Hayes
- Re: Outstanding Issues - an RDF statement is an assertion Pat Hayes
- Re: Concerns about reification Pat Hayes
- Re: simplified datatyping proposal Pat Hayes
- Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Pat Hayes
- Re: simplified datatyping proposal Pat Hayes
- telecon at the f2f Brian McBride
- weekly call for agenda items Brian McBride
- Re: simplified datatyping proposal Pat Hayes
- Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Pat Hayes
- RE: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-seq-representation Brian McBride
- Proposal for fragment identifiers in RDF Graham Klyne
- RE: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-seq-representation Dan Connolly
- RE: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-seq-representation Jeremy Carroll
- Re: Outstanding Issues - an RDF statement is an assertion Graham Klyne
- Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Graham Klyne
- RE: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-seq-representation Dan Connolly
- RE: Outstanding Issues - rdf-charmod-uris Jeremy Carroll
- RE: Outstanding Issues - rdf-charmod-literals Jeremy Carroll
- Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Patrick Stickler
- Re: Outstanding Issues - an RDF statement is an assertion Frank Manola
- Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Patrick Stickler
- Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Brian McBride
- RE: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-seq-representation Jeremy Carroll
- RE: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure Jeremy Carroll
- Re: simplified datatyping proposal Patrick Stickler
- RE: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-xmllang Jeremy Carroll
- Re: simplified datatyping proposal Patrick Stickler
- Re: simplified datatyping proposal Jos De_Roo
- Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Patrick Stickler
- RE: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr: Jeremy Carroll
- Re: simplified datatyping proposal Graham Klyne
- Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Graham Klyne
- Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Pat Hayes
- simplified datatyping proposal Pat Hayes
Tuesday, 19 February 2002
- Re: Outstanding Issues - an RDF statement is an assertion Dan Brickley
- Re: Outstanding Issues - an RDF statement is an assertion Graham Klyne
- Re: Outstanding Issues - an RDF statement is an assertion Frank Manola
- Re: Outstanding Issues - an RDF statement is an assertion Graham Klyne
- Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Pat Hayes
- Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Pat Hayes
- Re: URIs vs. URIviews (Pat's questions) Pat Hayes
- Re: Concerns about reification Frank Manola
- Re: A concern with the Datatyping proposal Graham Klyne
- RE: XML Base - discussion + test cases Graham Klyne
- A concern with the Datatyping proposal Graham Klyne
- Re: Concerns about reification Brian McBride
- RE: XML Base - discussion + test cases Jeremy Carroll
- Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Brian McBride
- Re: XML Base - discussion + test cases Graham Klyne
- Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Jan Grant
- Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Brian McBride
- Re: URIs vs. URIviews (Pat's questions) Graham Klyne
- Re: Datatyping namespaces (was: Re: Datatyping use cases) Graham Klyne
- XML Base - discussion + test cases Jeremy Carroll
- Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Jan Grant
- Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Patrick Stickler
- Attempt to recap/summarize (was Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)) Patrick Stickler
- Re: Literal subjects can be tidy (was: Re: Use case for tidy literal subjects (ignore if not interested)) Patrick Stickler
- Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15) Dan Brickley
- Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Patrick Stickler
- Re: Datatyping namespaces (was: Re: Datatyping use cases) Patrick Stickler
- Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Patrick Stickler
- Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Patrick Stickler
- Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Patrick Stickler
- Re: URIs vs. URIviews (issue background) Aaron Swartz
- Re: URIs vs. URIviews (Pat's questions) Aaron Swartz
- Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Dan Connolly
- Literal subjects can be tidy (was: Re: Use case for tidy literal subjects (ignore if not interested)) Pat Hayes
- Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Jos De_Roo
- Re: Datatyping namespaces (was: Re: Datatyping use cases) jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
- Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Jos De_Roo
- Datatyping namespaces (was: Re: Datatyping use cases) Pat Hayes
Monday, 18 February 2002
- Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Pat Hayes
- Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15) Pat Hayes
- Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15) Pat Hayes
- Re: URIs vs. URIviews (core issue) Pat Hayes
- Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Dan Connolly
- around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Brian McBride
- Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon) Pat Hayes
- Re: a theory of rdf:Bags Pat Hayes
- Re: property formerly known as rdf:value Pat Hayes
- Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15) Aaron Swartz
- Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15) Brian McBride
- Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15) Aaron Swartz
- Re: URIs vs. URIviews (core issue) Aaron Swartz
Sunday, 17 February 2002
- Re: a theory of rdf:Bags Jos De_Roo
- a theory of rdf:Bags Dan Connolly
- Re: Exact ranges and using S-B Patrick Stickler
Saturday, 16 February 2002
- Re: Exact ranges and using S-B Patrick Stickler
- Re: Datatyping use cases Patrick Stickler
- Re: RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-02-15 Patrick Stickler
- Re: Datatyping use cases Patrick Stickler
- Re: RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-02-15 Dave Beckett
- RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-02-15 Dave Beckett
- Re: property formerly known as rdf:value Patrick Stickler
- Re: property formerly known as rdf:value Patrick Stickler
- Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon) Patrick Stickler
- Re: Datatyping use cases Patrick Stickler
- Re: Parser mods to support rdf:dtype and rdf:lform Patrick Stickler
- More fun with xml:lang Patrick Stickler
- Interpretation Use Cases for Datatyping (and Union to the rescue) Patrick Stickler
- Re: property formerly known as rdf:value Jos De_Roo
- Re: property formerly known as rdf:value Brian McBride
- Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon) Patrick Stickler
- Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon) Patrick Stickler
- Use case for tidy literal subjects (ignore if not interested) Patrick Stickler
- RE: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon) Ronald Daniel
- RE: Provenance usage scenario - releaseTime Ronald Daniel
- Re: Provenance usage scenario - releaseTime Graham Klyne
- property formerly known as rdf:value Pat Hayes
Friday, 15 February 2002
- Re: Provenance usage scenario - releaseTime Frank Manola
- Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon) Pat Hayes
- Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15) Pat Hayes
- Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15) Aaron Swartz
- Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15) Pat Hayes
- Re: reification "subagenda" Pat Hayes
- Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon) Pat Hayes
- Re: Concerns about reification Frank Manola
- Concerns about reification Sergey Melnik
- Re: Datatyping use cases Brian McBride
- Provenance usage scenario - releaseTime Ronald Daniel
- Re: Parser mods to support rdf:dtype and rdf:lform Brian McBride
- Datatyping use cases Patrick Stickler
- Exact ranges and using S-B Sergey Melnik
- Re: reification "subagenda" Frank Manola
- regrets and reification Dan Brickley
- Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon) Patrick Stickler
- Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon) Dan Connolly
- entailment test cases and namespace entailment jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
- Re: Parser mods to support rdf:dtype and rdf:lform Patrick Stickler
- Re: Parser mods to support rdf:dtype and rdf:lform Patrick Stickler
- Re: Parser mods to support rdf:dtype and rdf:lform Patrick Stickler
- Re: Parser mods to support rdf:dtype and rdf:lform Brian McBride
- Re: Parser mods to support rdf:dtype and rdf:lform Dave Beckett
- Re: Parser mods to support rdf:dtype and rdf:lform Brian McBride
- Re: Parser mods to support rdf:dtype and rdf:lform Brian McBride
- Re: Parser mods to support rdf:dtype and rdf:lform Patrick Stickler
- Re: reification "subagenda" Graham Klyne
- Re: Parser mods to support rdf:dtype and rdf:lform Patrick Stickler
- Re: Parser mods to support rdf:dtype and rdf:lform Dave Beckett
- Re: linking reification to reified (was: Re: reification "subagenda") Graham Klyne
- Re: Parser mods to support rdf:dtype and rdf:lform Dave Beckett
- Re: Parser mods to support rdf:dtype and rdf:lform Patrick Stickler
- Re: Parser mods to support rdf:dtype and rdf:lform Patrick Stickler
- Re: Parser mods to support rdf:dtype and rdf:lform Dave Beckett
- Re: Parser mods to support rdf:dtype and rdf:lform Dave Beckett
- Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15) Dave Beckett
- Re: doing provenance in RDF 1.0 clarified Brian McBride
- Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15 Brian McBride
- Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15) Brian McBride
- Re: Parser mods to support rdf:dtype and rdf:lform Brian McBride
- Re: reification "subagenda" Jan Grant
- Parser mods to support rdf:dtype and rdf:lform Patrick Stickler
- Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon) Patrick Stickler
- Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon) Patrick Stickler
- Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15) Patrick Stickler
- Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15 Patrick Stickler
- Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15) Aaron Swartz
- Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon) Dan Connolly
- Re: reification "subagenda" Dan Connolly
- datatyping draft 3 (for telecon) Pat Hayes
- Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15) Dan Connolly
- Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15) Dan Connolly
- Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15) Aaron Swartz
- Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15) Aaron Swartz
- Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15) Aaron Swartz
Thursday, 14 February 2002
- linking reification to reified (was: Re: reification "subagenda") Pat Hayes
- Re: ACTION: 2001-11-16#7 Pat Hayes
- Re: doing provenance in RDF 1.0 clarified Pat Hayes
- Re: reification "subagenda" Pat Hayes
- Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15) Pat Hayes
- Re: to pull or not to pull [was: Re: Entailment and bags (was:Re: Agenda items for the f2f)] Pat Hayes
- Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15) Graham Klyne
- Re: doing provenance in RDF 1.0 clarified Graham Klyne
- Datatyping Graham Klyne
- Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15 Dan Connolly
- Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15) Dan Connolly
- Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15) Brian McBride
- URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15) Aaron Swartz
- happy valentines day, New RDF Model Theory Working Draft published Eric Miller
- Re: doing provenance in RDF 1.0 clarified Sergey Melnik
- Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15 bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
- Re: Reification: proposed resolution Graham Klyne
- Re: reification "subagenda" Graham Klyne
- Re: ACTION: 2001-11-16#7 Jos De_Roo
- Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Frank Manola
- Re: to pull or not to pull [was: Re: Entailment and bags (was:Re: Agenda items for the f2f)] Patrick Stickler
- Re: Reification: proposed resolution Frank Manola
- Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Martyn Horner
- Re: Reification: proposed resolution Brian McBride
- Re: doing provenance in RDF 1.0 clarified Frank Manola
- to pull or not to pull [was: Re: Entailment and bags (was:Re: Agenda items for the f2f)] Brian McBride
- Re: reification "subagenda" Frank Manola
- Re: ACTION: 2001-11-16#7 Frank Manola
- Re: Outstanding Issues Brian McBride
- Re: reification "subagenda" Brian McBride
- Re: A collection of issue resolutions Brian McBride
- Re: doing provenance in RDF 1.0 clarified Brian McBride
- Re: ACTION: 2001-11-16#7 Brian McBride
- Re: ACTION: 2001-11-16#7 Frank Manola
- Re: reification "subagenda" Brian McBride
- Re: A collection of issue resolutions Dave Beckett
- Re: rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure, again [was: Outstanding Issues] Patrick Stickler
- Re: A collection of issue resolutions Patrick Stickler
Wednesday, 13 February 2002
- ACTION: 2001-11-16#7 Brian McBride
- Re: doing provenance in RDF 1.0 clarified Frank Manola
- Re: reification "subagenda" Dan Connolly
- Re: doing provenance in RDF 1.0 clarified Sergey Melnik
- Re: A collection of issue resolutions Pat Hayes
- Re: A collection of issue resolutions Pat Hayes
- reification "subagenda" Frank Manola
- Re: A collection of issue resolutions Pat Hayes
- rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure, again [was: Outstanding Issues] Dan Connolly
- Re: Reification: proposed resolution Pat Hayes
- Re: Reification: proposed resolution Pat Hayes
- Re: Outstanding Issues Pat Hayes
- Re: Outstanding Issues Pat Hayes
- Re: Entailment versus implication Pat Hayes
- Re: Entailment and bags (was:Re: Agenda items for the f2f) Pat Hayes
- Re: Outstanding Issues Pat Hayes
- Re: A collection of issue resolutions Brian McBride
- Re: A collection of issue resolutions Patrick Stickler
- Re: rdfms-uri-substructure: some clarifying advice [was: A collection of issue resolutions] Dan Connolly
- Re: rdfms-uri-substructure: some clarifying advice [was: A collection of issue resolutions] Brian McBride
- call for agenda items Brian McBride
- Re: A collection of issue resolutions Brian McBride
- Re: migrating from M&S Frank Manola
- Re: A collection of issue resolutions Patrick Stickler
- Re: A collection of issue resolutions Patrick Stickler
- RE: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Bill de hÓra
- Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Patrick Stickler
- RE: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Bill de hÓra
- RE: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Bill de hÓra
- migrating from M&S Bill de hÓra
- Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Patrick Stickler
- Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Frank Manola
- Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Brian McBride
- Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Patrick Stickler
- Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Frank Manola
- Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Patrick Stickler
- Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Patrick Stickler
- Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Brian McBride
- Re: Reification: proposed resolution Patrick Stickler
- Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Patrick Stickler
- Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Patrick Stickler
- Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Patrick Stickler
- Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Dave Beckett
Tuesday, 12 February 2002
- Re: Reification: proposed resolution Frank Manola
- RE: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Ronald Daniel
- Re: rdfms-uri-substructure: some clarifying advice [was: A collection of issue resolutions] Dan Connolly
- Re: Reification: proposed resolution Jos De_Roo
- rdfms-uri-substructure: some clarifying advice [was: A collection of issue resolutions] Dan Connolly
- F2F Objectives and Agenda Brian McBride
- Re: Outstanding Issues Brian McBride
- A collection of issue resolutions Brian McBride
- Reification: proposed resolution Brian McBride
- Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Frank Manola
- Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Brian McBride
- Re: Outstanding Issues Brian McBride
- Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Patrick Stickler
- Re: Outstanding Issues Patrick Stickler
- Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Patrick Stickler
- RE: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Brian McBride
- RE: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Bill de hÓra
- Re: Outstanding Issues Graham Klyne
- Re: Dublin Core and multiple element concern Graham Klyne
- Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Brian McBride
- Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Brian McBride
- Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Jos De_Roo
- Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Brian McBride
- Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Patrick Stickler
- Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Brian McBride
- Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Patrick Stickler
- Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Patrick Stickler
Monday, 11 February 2002
- Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Brian McBride
- Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Patrick Stickler
- Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Brian McBride
- Re: rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure [was Re: Outstanding Issues] Patrick Stickler
- rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure [was Re: Outstanding Issues] Dave Beckett
- xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Dave Beckett
- Re: Entailment versus implication Patrick Stickler
- Re: Dublin Core and multiple element concern Patrick Stickler
- Re: Outstanding Issues Patrick Stickler
- Re: BagID issue link Pat Hayes
- Re: type/dtype/subclassing and range/subproperties Pat Hayes
- Re: Dublin Core and multiple element concern Pat Hayes
- Re: Entailment and bags (was:Re: Agenda items for the f2f) Brian McBride
- Re: Entailment and bags (was:Re: Agenda items for the f2f) Pat Hayes
- Re: Entailment versus implication Pat Hayes
- Outstanding Issues Brian McBride
- Re: doing provenance in RDF 1.0 clarified Patrick Stickler
- Re: doing provenance in RDF 1.0 clarified Patrick Stickler
- Re: One final step to datatyping convergence and closure? Patrick Stickler
- Re: BagID issue link Patrick Stickler
Sunday, 10 February 2002
- Re: doing provenance in RDF 1.0 clarified Graham Klyne
- Re: One final step to datatyping convergence and closure? Jos De_Roo
- Re: doing provenance in RDF 1.0 clarified Brian McBride
- Re: BagID issue link Brian McBride
- Re: doing provenance in RDF 1.0 clarified Dan Brickley
- Re: doing provenance in RDF 1.0 clarified Jos De_Roo
- Re: doing provenance in RDF 1.0 clarified Brian McBride
- doing provenance in RDF 1.0 clarified jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Saturday, 9 February 2002
- Re: One final step to datatyping convergence and closure? Pat Hayes
- Re: Datatyping Summary V5 (skippable) Patrick Stickler
- simple entailment testcase [Was: Re: reification test case] jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Friday, 8 February 2002
- One final step to datatyping convergence and closure? Patrick Stickler
- Minutes, 2002-02-08 teleconference Graham Klyne
- BagID issue link Jeremy Carroll
- Re: reification decision process intro Pat Hayes
- BagID issue link Jeremy Carroll
- Re: Dublin Core and multiple element concerns Jeremy Carroll
- Re: Dublin Core and multiple element concerns Dan Connolly
- Re: Datatyping Summary V5 (skippable) Brian McBride
- Re: Datatyping and idioms Graham Klyne
- Re: reification decision process intro Frank Manola
- Re: Datatyping Summary V5 (skippable) patrick.stickler@nokia.com
- Re: reification decision process intro Jos De_Roo
- Re: reification decision process intro jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
- Re: reification decision process intro Brian McBride
- Re: reification decision process intro Frank Manola
- Re: Datatyping Summary V5 (skippable) Jos De_Roo
- Re: reification decision process intro Jos De_Roo
- Datatyping Summary V5 (skippable) Brian McBride
- Re: type/dtype/subclassing and range/subproperties Jos De_Roo
- Re: Datatypes Convergence patrick.stickler@nokia.com
- Re: Dublin Core and multiple element concern patrick.stickler@nokia.com
- Re: Datatyping and idioms patrick.stickler@nokia.com
- Re: type/dtype/subclassing and range/subproperties patrick.stickler@nokia.com
- Re: RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-02-01 Dan Brickley
- MT publication, dropped ball Dan Brickley
- reification decision process intro Frank Manola
Thursday, 7 February 2002
- Re: Some words about formal semantics Graham Klyne
- new Primer draft Frank Manola
- Re: Some words about formal semantics Frank Manola
- Some words about formal semantics Graham Klyne
- Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-08 bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
- Re: Dublin Core and multiple element concerns Brian McBride
- Re: RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-02-01 Brian McBride
- Re: summary of reification? Frank Manola
- type/dtype/subclassing and range/subproperties Graham Klyne
- RE: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Sum mary V4] Ronald Daniel
- Re: RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-02-01 Brian McBride
- Re: PRISM and multiple element concern Pat Hayes
- Datatyping and idioms Graham Klyne
- RE: Dublin Core and multiple element concern Ronald Daniel
- Re: summary of reification? Pat Hayes
- Re: summary of reification? Pat Hayes
- Re: Dublin Core and multiple element concern Dave Beckett
- Re: summary of reification? Pat Hayes
- Re: A basis for convergence and closure? Pat Hayes
- Re: Dublin Core and multiple element concern Pat Hayes
- Dublin Core and multiple element concerns Dave Beckett
- Re: Dublin Core and multiple element concern Dave Beckett
- Re: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Sum mary V4] patrick.stickler@nokia.com
- Re: Datatypes Convergence patrick.stickler@nokia.com
- RE: summary of reification? Jeremy Carroll
- Re: Dublin Core and multiple element concern Brian McBride
- Dublin Core and multiple element concern Dave Beckett
- RE: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Sum mary V4] Eric Miller
- RE: summary of reification? Brian McBride
- RE: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Sum mary V4] Brian McBride
- Re: PRISM and multiple element concern Brian McBride
- RE: summary of reification? Jeremy Carroll
- RE: summary of reification? Jeremy Carroll
- Re: PRISM and multiple element concern Brian McBride
- Re: summary of reification? Jos De_Roo
- Re: Datatypes Convergence Brian McBride
- Re: summary of reification? Brian McBride
- Re: A basis for convergence and closure? Brian McBride
- Fwd: Connectivity at the Tech Plenary Brian McBride
- Re: summary of reification? Graham Klyne
- Re: summary of reification? Graham Klyne
- Re: summary of reification? Jos De_Roo
- Re: reification test case jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
- Re: A basis for convergence and closure? Pat Hayes
- Re: Datatypes and xml:lang Pat Hayes
- Re: A basis for convergence and closure? Jos De_Roo
- Re: summary of reification? Pat Hayes
- Re: summary of reification? Sergey Melnik
- Re: Oh my GOD, another datatype document. Pat Hayes
- Re: A basis for convergence and closure? Sergey Melnik
Wednesday, 6 February 2002
- Re: A basis for convergence and closure? Pat Hayes
- Re: Oh my GOD, another datatype document. Pat Hayes
- Re: summary of reification? Pat Hayes
- Re: summary of reification? Pat Hayes
- Re: A basis for convergence and closure? jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
- Re: Datatypes Convergence Brian McBride
- Re: summary of reification? Graham Klyne
- Re: Datatypes Convergence Graham Klyne
- Re: summary of reification? Graham Klyne
- Re: A basis for convergence and closure? Graham Klyne
- Re: Datatypes Convergence Daniel W. Connolly
- Re: Datatypes Convergence Daniel W. Connolly
- Re: summary of reification? Sergey Melnik
- Re: ACTION 2002-01-24#4 responses on datatyping Pat Hayes
- Re: summary of reification? Brian McBride
- Re: Datatypes and xml:lang Patrick Stickler
- Re: Datatypes Convergence Patrick Stickler
- Re: Datatypes and xml:lang Pat Hayes
- Re: A basis for convergence and closure? Patrick Stickler
- Re: summary of reification? Pat Hayes
- Re: reification test case Pat Hayes
- Re: Oh my GOD, another datatype document. Patrick Stickler
- Re: Oh my GOD, another datatype document. Patrick Stickler
- Re: A basis for convergence and closure? Pat Hayes
- Datatypes Convergence Brian McBride
- Re: Oh my GOD, another datatype document. Pat Hayes
- RE: Oh my GOD, another datatype document. Pat Hayes
- ACTION 2002-01-24#4 responses on datatyping Jeremy Carroll
- Re: Datatypes and xml:lang Patrick Stickler
- Re: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Summary V4] Patrick Stickler
- Re: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Summary V4] Graham Klyne
Tuesday, 5 February 2002
- summary of reification? Sergey Melnik
- Re: A basis for convergence and closure? Patrick Stickler
- Re: Flower Power and Datatyping ~:-) Sergey Melnik
- Re: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Summary V4] Patrick Stickler
- Re: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Sum mary V4] Patrick Stickler
- Re: Datatyping Summary V4 Sergey Melnik
- Re: Reification puzzles (was: RE: reification test case) Jos De_Roo
- RE: PRISM and multiple element concern - CORRECTION Ronald Daniel
- Re: Monotonicity Sergey Melnik
- RE: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Sum mary V4] Ronald Daniel
- PRISM and multiple element concern Ronald Daniel
- B5 storage: why did it go away? [was: why S...] Daniel W. Connolly
- Re: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Summary V4] Daniel W. Connolly
- RE: Datatyping, text case Jeremy Carroll
- Re: reification test case Jos De_Roo
- Re: A basis for convergence and closure? Patrick Stickler
- Re: A basis for convergence and closure? Patrick Stickler
- FW: RDFCore WG: Datatyping documents Patrick Stickler
- RE: A basis for convergence and closure? Jeremy Carroll
- RE: A basis for convergence and closure? Jeremy Carroll
- Re: A basis for convergence and closure? Patrick Stickler
- Re: A basis for convergence and closure? Patrick Stickler
- RE: A basis for convergence and closure? Jeremy Carroll
- RE: Oh my GOD, another datatype document. Jeremy Carroll
- Re: Oh my GOD, another datatype document. Patrick Stickler
- RE: Reification puzzles (was: RE: reification test case) Jeremy Carroll
- RE: Monotonicity Jeremy Carroll
- Re: scope of parseType [was: Re: Flower Power and Datatyping ~:-)] Dave Beckett
- RE: Datatypes and xml:lang Jeremy Carroll
- Re: Datatyping Summary V4 Patrick Stickler
- Re: Reification puzzles (was: RE: reification test case) Graham Klyne
- Re: reification test case Patrick Stickler
- Re: Datatyping Summary Graham Klyne
- Re: Datatyping Summary V4 Patrick Stickler
- FW: Reification thing questions Patrick Stickler
- A basis for convergence and closure? Patrick Stickler
- Re: Datatypes and xml:lang Dave Beckett
- Re: scope of parseType [was: Re: Flower Power and Datatyping ~:-)] Dave Beckett
- RE: reification test case Bill de hÓra
- RE: Reification puzzles (was: RE: reification test case) Bill de hÓra
- RE: reification test case Bill de hÓra
- Re: datatyping summary Patrick Stickler
- Re: Entailment and bags (was:Re: Agenda items for the f2f) Brian McBride
- Re: Datatyping Summary V4 Brian McBride
- Re: reification test case Patrick Stickler
- Re: reification test case Patrick Stickler
- Re: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Summary V4] Patrick Stickler
- Re: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Summary V4] Patrick Stickler
- Re: Tidy literal nodes incompatable with current MT? Patrick Stickler
- Entailment versus implication Patrick Stickler
- Reification thing questions (was: Re: reification test case) Pat Hayes
- Re: Datatyping Summary V4 Sergey Melnik
Monday, 4 February 2002
- Re: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Summary V4] Pat Hayes
Tuesday, 5 February 2002
- Re: reification test case Pat Hayes
Monday, 4 February 2002
- Re: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Summary V4] Pat Hayes
Tuesday, 5 February 2002
- Re: Datatyping Summary Sergey Melnik
- Re: reification test case Pat Hayes
- Reification puzzles (was: RE: reification test case) Pat Hayes
- Re: reification test case Pat Hayes
- Re: reification test case Jos De_Roo
- Identity of things (was: Re: reification test case) Pat Hayes
- RE: reification test case Pat Hayes
- Re: Reject change to rdf:value Pat Hayes
- Re: reification test case Pat Hayes
- Re: reification test case Pat Hayes
- Re: reification test case Pat Hayes
- Re: reification test case Pat Hayes
Monday, 4 February 2002
- Re: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Summary V4] Patrick Stickler
- Re: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Summary V4] Jos De_Roo
- Oh my GOD, another datatype document. Pat Hayes
- Re: Datatyping Summary Sergey Melnik
- Re: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Summary V4] Patrick Stickler
- Re: For untidiness ... Patrick Stickler
- Re: For untidiness ... Sergey Melnik
- Re: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Summary V4] Graham Klyne
- Re: Monotonicity Sergey Melnik
- Re: first guess rdfr-theory [was:Re: reification test case] Graham Klyne
- Re: Flower Power and Datatyping ~:-) Patrick Stickler
- Re: Tidy literal nodes incompatable with current MT? Sergey Melnik
- Re: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Summary V4] Graham Klyne
- Re: Datatyping Summary V4 Graham Klyne
- Re: Flower Power and Datatyping ~:-) Graham Klyne
- Re: Flower Power and Datatyping ~:-) Sergey Melnik
- Re: Flower Power and Datatyping ~:-) Sergey Melnik
- first guess rdfr-theory [was:Re: reification test case] Jos De_Roo
- Entailment and bags (was:Re: Agenda items for the f2f) Pat Hayes
- Re: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Summary V4] Brian McBride
- Re: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Summary V4] Patrick Stickler
- Re: reification test case Patrick Stickler
- why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Summary V4] Dan Connolly
- Re: reification test case Patrick Stickler
- RE: reification test case Jeremy Carroll
- Re: reification test case Dan Connolly
- Re: reification test case Brian McBride
- Re: reification test case Dan Brickley
- Re: Datatyping Summary V4 Patrick Stickler
- RE: Datatyping Summary V4 Brian McBride
- Re: reification test case Patrick Stickler
- RE: Datatyping Summary V4 Jeremy Carroll
- Re: Bermudan flowers: Query, I18N, and syntax vs semantics Patrick Stickler
- Re: Bermudan flowers: Query, I18N, and syntax vs semantics Patrick Stickler
- RE: Bermudan flowers: Query, I18N, and syntax vs semantics Jeremy Carroll
- RE: Bermudan flowers: Query, I18N, and syntax vs semantics Jeremy Carroll
- Re: reification test case Dan Brickley
- Re: Bermudan flowers: Query, I18N, and syntax vs semantics Patrick Stickler
- Re: Datatyping Summary V4 Patrick Stickler
- Re: Datatyping Summary V4 Brian McBride
- Re: reification test case Jos De_Roo
- RE: reification test case Dan Connolly
- Bermudan flowers: Query, I18N, and syntax vs semantics Jeremy Carroll
- Re: Flower Power and Datatyping ~:-) Brian McBride
- Re: Datatyping Summary V4 Patrick Stickler
- RE: Datatyping Summary V4 Jeremy Carroll
- Re: RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-02-01 Brian McBride
- Re: Model theory for b-nodes [was: Re: reification test case] Patrick Stickler
- RE: reification test case Jeremy Carroll
- Model theory for b-nodes [was: Re: reification test case] Brian McBride
- Datatyping Summary V4 Brian McBride
- Re: reification test case Martyn Horner
- Re: reification test case Brian McBride
- Re: reification test case Graham Klyne
- Re: reification test case Graham Klyne
- Re: why not take just the 2 ??? Patrick Stickler
- Re: reification test case jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
- Re: why not take just the 2 ??? jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
- Re: reification test case Patrick Stickler
- Re: why not take just the 2 ??? Patrick Stickler
- Re: why not take just the 2 ??? Patrick Stickler
- Re: reification test case Patrick Stickler
- Re: reification test case Dan Brickley
Sunday, 3 February 2002
- Re: why not take just the 2 ??? jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
- Re: reification test case jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
- Re: Primer status and Re: RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-02-01 Frank Manola
- Re: reification test case Frank Manola
- Re: RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-02-01 Frank Manola
- Re: Primer status and Re: RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-02-01 Graham Klyne
- Re: reification test case Patrick Stickler
- Re: why not take just the 2 ??? Patrick Stickler
- Re: why not take just the 2 ??? Patrick Stickler
- reification test case Brian McBride
- Re: RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-02-01 Brian McBride
- Re: why not take just the 2 ??? jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
- Re: Flower Power and Datatyping ~:-) Patrick Stickler
- Re: why not take just the 2 ??? Patrick Stickler
Saturday, 2 February 2002
- why not take just the 2 ??? jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
- Primer status and Re: RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-02-01 Frank Manola
Friday, 1 February 2002
- Re: RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-02-01 Dan Connolly
- RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-02-01 jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
- Re: Datatypes: the Bermuda Triangle, and how to fly over it. Sergey Melnik
- Re: Datatypes and xml:lang Sergey Melnik
- Flower Power and Datatyping ~:-) Sergey Melnik
- Re: Datatypes: the Bermuda Triangle, and how to fly over it. Graham Klyne
- Re: Datatypes: the Bermuda Triangle, and how to fly over it. jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
- Datatyping, text case Graham Klyne
- Re: Datatyping Summary V3 Graham Klyne
- Re: Datatypes: the Bermuda Triangle, and how to fly over it. Graham Klyne
- Re: Datatypes: the Bermuda Triangle, and how to fly over it. Patrick Stickler
- Re: Datatyping Summary V2 Patrick Stickler

Last message date: Thursday, 28 February 2002 16:57:07 UTC
Archived on: Friday, 17 January 2020 20:24:10 UTC

w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org from February 2002 by date