w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org from February 2002 by date

Thursday, 28 February 2002

Re: a few questions about literals Jos De_Roo
Re: a few questions about literals Dan Connolly

Wednesday, 27 February 2002

a few questions about literals Pat Hayes

Thursday, 28 February 2002

Re: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-xmllang Brian McBride
Re: possible way out of maze? [was: Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ]] Brian McBride
Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Brian McBride
Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Brian McBride

Wednesday, 27 February 2002

Re: the S-B problem and what to do about it. Brian McBride
Fwd: Addition to Pubrules: New Pubrules Checker Available Brian McBride
RE: possible way out of maze? [was: Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ]] Bill de hÓra
RE: possible way out of maze? [was: Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstan ding Issues ]] Ronald Daniel
Re: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-xmllang John Cowan
Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Jos De_Roo
Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Pat Hayes
possible way out of maze? [was: Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ]] Pat Hayes
Datatyping "code" for testing and consideration Patrick Stickler
Re: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-xmllang Martin Duerst
Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Dan Connolly
Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Pat Hayes
Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Pat Hayes
Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Pat Hayes
Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Pat Hayes

Tuesday, 26 February 2002

Datatyping Ontology Mike Dean
Minutes for 2002-02-22 RDF Core Telecon Aaron Swartz

Monday, 25 February 2002

Adding lrange to the recent proposal (was: Re: the S-B problem and what to do about it.) Pat Hayes
Re: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-xmllang Mark Davis
Re: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-xmllang John Cowan
Re: the S-B problem and what to do about it. Patrick Stickler
RE: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-xmllang Pat Hayes
RE: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-xmllang Misha.Wolf@reuters.com
RE: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-xmllang Misha.Wolf@reuters.com

Sunday, 24 February 2002

RE: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-xmllang Pat Hayes
Re: Datatypes: unhappy of Bristol Pat Hayes
revised datatyping proposal, now twopence colored Pat Hayes
Re: the S-B problem and what to do about it. Aaron Swartz
the S-B problem and what to do about it. Pat Hayes
revised datatyping proposal Pat Hayes
Some experimental CWM rules for datatyping idioms Patrick Stickler
Re: Datatypes: unhappy of Bristol Brian McBride
RE: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-xmllang Brian McBride

Saturday, 23 February 2002

RE: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-xmllang Misha.Wolf@reuters.com
Re: "Datatyping for Dummies" (or Occam's Razor Slash Fest) Patrick Stickler
Four thousand words on datatyping... Patrick Stickler
Re: Datatypes: unhappy of Bristol Jos De_Roo
Datatypes: unhappy of Bristol Jeremy Carroll
RE: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-xmllang Jeremy Carroll

Friday, 22 February 2002

RE: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-xmllang Misha.Wolf@reuters.com
Re: dizzying datatypes discussions [was: Occam-slashed datatypes] Pat Hayes
Re: Occam-slashed datatypes Pat Hayes
Re: Occam-slashed datatypes Pat Hayes
Re: simplified datatyping proposal Pat Hayes
Re: telecon at the f2f Eric Miller
Re: "Datatyping for Dummies" (or Occam's Razor Slash Fest) Pat Hayes
RE: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-xmllang Jeremy Carroll
RE: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-xmllang Jeremy Carroll
Re: Test cases (entailment) ... Was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-22 Brian McBride
Re: Occam-slashed datatypes Patrick Stickler
Test cases (entailment) ... Was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-22 Jan Grant
Re: Occam-slashed datatypes Sergey Melnik
Re: Occam-slashed datatypes Patrick Stickler
Re: Occam-slashed datatypes Patrick Stickler
Re: "Datatyping for Dummies" (or Occam's Razor Slash Fest) Patrick Stickler
Re: simplified datatyping proposal Patrick Stickler
Re: simplified datatyping proposal Patrick Stickler
Re: telecon at the f2f Aaron Swartz
Occam-slashed datatypes Pat Hayes
Re: Even more simplified datatyping proposal Pat Hayes
Re: simplified datatyping proposal Jos De_Roo
Re: simplified datatyping proposal Jos De_Roo
Re: simplified datatyping proposal Pat Hayes

Thursday, 21 February 2002

Re: "Datatyping for Dummies" (or Occam's Razor Slash Fest) Pat Hayes
Re: simplified datatyping proposal Pat Hayes
Re: Subtler simplified datatypes. Pat Hayes
Re: simplified datatyping proposal Pat Hayes
Re: simplified datatyping proposal Pat Hayes
Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-22 bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Re: simplified datatyping proposal Jeremy Carroll
Re: telecon at the f2f Frank Manola
RE: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-xmllang Misha.Wolf@reuters.com
Re: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-xmllang Dave Beckett
RE: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-xmllang Brian McBride
Re: "Datatyping for Dummies" answers to quiz Patrick Stickler
RE: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-xmllang Misha.Wolf@reuters.com
Re: simplified datatyping proposal Graham Klyne
"Datatyping for Dummies" answers to quiz Patrick Stickler
"Datatyping for Dummies" (or Occam's Razor Slash Fest) Patrick Stickler
Re: Subtler simplified datatypes. Patrick Stickler
FW: Even more simplified datatyping proposal Patrick Stickler
FW: Even more simplified datatyping proposal Patrick Stickler
FW: Even more simplified datatyping proposal Patrick Stickler
Re: Subtler simplified datatypes. Patrick Stickler
Re: simplified datatyping proposal Patrick Stickler
Re: simplified datatyping proposal Patrick Stickler
Re: simplified datatyping proposal Patrick Stickler
around and around and around the table [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Pat Hayes
Re: simplified datatyping proposal Pat Hayes
Re: simplified datatyping proposal Pat Hayes
Re: Subtler simplified datatypes. Pat Hayes
Re: weekly call for agenda items Frank Manola
Re: weekly call for agenda items Frank Manola

Wednesday, 20 February 2002

Re: simplified datatyping proposal Jos De_Roo
Re: simplified datatyping proposal Graham Klyne
Re: simplified datatyping proposal Graham Klyne
Re: simplified datatyping proposal Graham Klyne
answers to quiz (was: Re: simplified datatyping proposal) Pat Hayes
Subtler simplified datatypes. Pat Hayes
Re: simplified datatyping proposal Pat Hayes
Re: weekly call for agenda items Pat Hayes
Re: weekly call for agenda items Pat Hayes
Re: Concerns about reification Pat Hayes
Re: Outstanding Issues - an RDF statement is an assertion Pat Hayes
Re: Concerns about reification Pat Hayes
Re: simplified datatyping proposal Pat Hayes
Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Pat Hayes
Re: simplified datatyping proposal Pat Hayes
telecon at the f2f Brian McBride
weekly call for agenda items Brian McBride
Re: simplified datatyping proposal Pat Hayes
Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Pat Hayes
RE: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-seq-representation Brian McBride
Proposal for fragment identifiers in RDF Graham Klyne
RE: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-seq-representation Dan Connolly
RE: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-seq-representation Jeremy Carroll
Re: Outstanding Issues - an RDF statement is an assertion Graham Klyne
Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Graham Klyne
RE: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-seq-representation Dan Connolly
RE: Outstanding Issues - rdf-charmod-uris Jeremy Carroll
RE: Outstanding Issues - rdf-charmod-literals Jeremy Carroll
Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Patrick Stickler
Re: Outstanding Issues - an RDF statement is an assertion Frank Manola
Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Patrick Stickler
Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Brian McBride
RE: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-seq-representation Jeremy Carroll
RE: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure Jeremy Carroll
Re: simplified datatyping proposal Patrick Stickler
RE: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-xmllang Jeremy Carroll
Re: simplified datatyping proposal Patrick Stickler
Re: simplified datatyping proposal Jos De_Roo
Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Patrick Stickler
RE: Outstanding Issues - rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr: Jeremy Carroll
Re: simplified datatyping proposal Graham Klyne
Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Graham Klyne
Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Pat Hayes
simplified datatyping proposal Pat Hayes

Tuesday, 19 February 2002

Re: Outstanding Issues - an RDF statement is an assertion Dan Brickley
Re: Outstanding Issues - an RDF statement is an assertion Graham Klyne
Re: Outstanding Issues - an RDF statement is an assertion Frank Manola
Re: Outstanding Issues - an RDF statement is an assertion Graham Klyne
Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Pat Hayes
Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Pat Hayes
Re: URIs vs. URIviews (Pat's questions) Pat Hayes
Re: Concerns about reification Frank Manola
Re: A concern with the Datatyping proposal Graham Klyne
RE: XML Base - discussion + test cases Graham Klyne
A concern with the Datatyping proposal Graham Klyne
Re: Concerns about reification Brian McBride
RE: XML Base - discussion + test cases Jeremy Carroll
Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Brian McBride
Re: XML Base - discussion + test cases Graham Klyne
Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Jan Grant
Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Brian McBride
Re: URIs vs. URIviews (Pat's questions) Graham Klyne
Re: Datatyping namespaces (was: Re: Datatyping use cases) Graham Klyne
XML Base - discussion + test cases Jeremy Carroll
Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Jan Grant
Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Patrick Stickler
Attempt to recap/summarize (was Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)) Patrick Stickler
Re: Literal subjects can be tidy (was: Re: Use case for tidy literal subjects (ignore if not interested)) Patrick Stickler
Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15) Dan Brickley
Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Patrick Stickler
Re: Datatyping namespaces (was: Re: Datatyping use cases) Patrick Stickler
Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Patrick Stickler
Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Patrick Stickler
Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Patrick Stickler
Re: URIs vs. URIviews (issue background) Aaron Swartz
Re: URIs vs. URIviews (Pat's questions) Aaron Swartz
Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Dan Connolly
Literal subjects can be tidy (was: Re: Use case for tidy literal subjects (ignore if not interested)) Pat Hayes
Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Jos De_Roo
Re: Datatyping namespaces (was: Re: Datatyping use cases) jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Jos De_Roo
Datatyping namespaces (was: Re: Datatyping use cases) Pat Hayes

Monday, 18 February 2002

Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Pat Hayes
Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15) Pat Hayes
Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15) Pat Hayes
Re: URIs vs. URIviews (core issue) Pat Hayes
Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Dan Connolly
around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)] Brian McBride
Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon) Pat Hayes
Re: a theory of rdf:Bags Pat Hayes
Re: property formerly known as rdf:value Pat Hayes
Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15) Aaron Swartz
Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15) Brian McBride
Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15) Aaron Swartz
Re: URIs vs. URIviews (core issue) Aaron Swartz

Sunday, 17 February 2002

Re: a theory of rdf:Bags Jos De_Roo
a theory of rdf:Bags Dan Connolly
Re: Exact ranges and using S-B Patrick Stickler

Saturday, 16 February 2002

Re: Exact ranges and using S-B Patrick Stickler
Re: Datatyping use cases Patrick Stickler
Re: RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-02-15 Patrick Stickler
Re: Datatyping use cases Patrick Stickler
Re: RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-02-15 Dave Beckett
RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-02-15 Dave Beckett
Re: property formerly known as rdf:value Patrick Stickler
Re: property formerly known as rdf:value Patrick Stickler
Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon) Patrick Stickler
Re: Datatyping use cases Patrick Stickler
Re: Parser mods to support rdf:dtype and rdf:lform Patrick Stickler
More fun with xml:lang Patrick Stickler
Interpretation Use Cases for Datatyping (and Union to the rescue) Patrick Stickler
Re: property formerly known as rdf:value Jos De_Roo
Re: property formerly known as rdf:value Brian McBride
Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon) Patrick Stickler
Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon) Patrick Stickler
Use case for tidy literal subjects (ignore if not interested) Patrick Stickler
RE: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon) Ronald Daniel
RE: Provenance usage scenario - releaseTime Ronald Daniel
Re: Provenance usage scenario - releaseTime Graham Klyne
property formerly known as rdf:value Pat Hayes

Friday, 15 February 2002

Re: Provenance usage scenario - releaseTime Frank Manola
Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon) Pat Hayes
Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15) Pat Hayes
Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15) Aaron Swartz
Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15) Pat Hayes
Re: reification "subagenda" Pat Hayes
Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon) Pat Hayes
Re: Concerns about reification Frank Manola
Concerns about reification Sergey Melnik
Re: Datatyping use cases Brian McBride
Provenance usage scenario - releaseTime Ronald Daniel
Re: Parser mods to support rdf:dtype and rdf:lform Brian McBride
Datatyping use cases Patrick Stickler
Exact ranges and using S-B Sergey Melnik
Re: reification "subagenda" Frank Manola
regrets and reification Dan Brickley
Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon) Patrick Stickler
Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon) Dan Connolly
entailment test cases and namespace entailment jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Re: Parser mods to support rdf:dtype and rdf:lform Patrick Stickler
Re: Parser mods to support rdf:dtype and rdf:lform Patrick Stickler
Re: Parser mods to support rdf:dtype and rdf:lform Patrick Stickler
Re: Parser mods to support rdf:dtype and rdf:lform Brian McBride
Re: Parser mods to support rdf:dtype and rdf:lform Dave Beckett
Re: Parser mods to support rdf:dtype and rdf:lform Brian McBride
Re: Parser mods to support rdf:dtype and rdf:lform Brian McBride
Re: Parser mods to support rdf:dtype and rdf:lform Patrick Stickler
Re: reification "subagenda" Graham Klyne
Re: Parser mods to support rdf:dtype and rdf:lform Patrick Stickler
Re: Parser mods to support rdf:dtype and rdf:lform Dave Beckett
Re: linking reification to reified (was: Re: reification "subagenda") Graham Klyne
Re: Parser mods to support rdf:dtype and rdf:lform Dave Beckett
Re: Parser mods to support rdf:dtype and rdf:lform Patrick Stickler
Re: Parser mods to support rdf:dtype and rdf:lform Patrick Stickler
Re: Parser mods to support rdf:dtype and rdf:lform Dave Beckett
Re: Parser mods to support rdf:dtype and rdf:lform Dave Beckett
Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15) Dave Beckett
Re: doing provenance in RDF 1.0 clarified Brian McBride
Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15 Brian McBride
Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15) Brian McBride
Re: Parser mods to support rdf:dtype and rdf:lform Brian McBride
Re: reification "subagenda" Jan Grant
Parser mods to support rdf:dtype and rdf:lform Patrick Stickler
Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon) Patrick Stickler
Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon) Patrick Stickler
Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15) Patrick Stickler
Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15 Patrick Stickler
Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15) Aaron Swartz
Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon) Dan Connolly
Re: reification "subagenda" Dan Connolly
datatyping draft 3 (for telecon) Pat Hayes
Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15) Dan Connolly
Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15) Dan Connolly
Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15) Aaron Swartz
Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15) Aaron Swartz
Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15) Aaron Swartz

Thursday, 14 February 2002

linking reification to reified (was: Re: reification "subagenda") Pat Hayes
Re: ACTION: 2001-11-16#7 Pat Hayes
Re: doing provenance in RDF 1.0 clarified Pat Hayes
Re: reification "subagenda" Pat Hayes
Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15) Pat Hayes
Re: to pull or not to pull [was: Re: Entailment and bags (was:Re: Agenda items for the f2f)] Pat Hayes
Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15) Graham Klyne
Re: doing provenance in RDF 1.0 clarified Graham Klyne
Datatyping Graham Klyne
Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15 Dan Connolly
Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15) Dan Connolly
Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15) Brian McBride
URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15) Aaron Swartz
happy valentines day, New RDF Model Theory Working Draft published Eric Miller
Re: doing provenance in RDF 1.0 clarified Sergey Melnik
Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15 bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Re: Reification: proposed resolution Graham Klyne
Re: reification "subagenda" Graham Klyne
Re: ACTION: 2001-11-16#7 Jos De_Roo
Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Frank Manola
Re: to pull or not to pull [was: Re: Entailment and bags (was:Re: Agenda items for the f2f)] Patrick Stickler
Re: Reification: proposed resolution Frank Manola
Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Martyn Horner
Re: Reification: proposed resolution Brian McBride
Re: doing provenance in RDF 1.0 clarified Frank Manola
to pull or not to pull [was: Re: Entailment and bags (was:Re: Agenda items for the f2f)] Brian McBride
Re: reification "subagenda" Frank Manola
Re: ACTION: 2001-11-16#7 Frank Manola
Re: Outstanding Issues Brian McBride
Re: reification "subagenda" Brian McBride
Re: A collection of issue resolutions Brian McBride
Re: doing provenance in RDF 1.0 clarified Brian McBride
Re: ACTION: 2001-11-16#7 Brian McBride
Re: ACTION: 2001-11-16#7 Frank Manola
Re: reification "subagenda" Brian McBride
Re: A collection of issue resolutions Dave Beckett
Re: rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure, again [was: Outstanding Issues] Patrick Stickler
Re: A collection of issue resolutions Patrick Stickler

Wednesday, 13 February 2002

ACTION: 2001-11-16#7 Brian McBride
Re: doing provenance in RDF 1.0 clarified Frank Manola
Re: reification "subagenda" Dan Connolly
Re: doing provenance in RDF 1.0 clarified Sergey Melnik
Re: A collection of issue resolutions Pat Hayes
Re: A collection of issue resolutions Pat Hayes
reification "subagenda" Frank Manola
Re: A collection of issue resolutions Pat Hayes
rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure, again [was: Outstanding Issues] Dan Connolly
Re: Reification: proposed resolution Pat Hayes
Re: Reification: proposed resolution Pat Hayes
Re: Outstanding Issues Pat Hayes
Re: Outstanding Issues Pat Hayes
Re: Entailment versus implication Pat Hayes
Re: Entailment and bags (was:Re: Agenda items for the f2f) Pat Hayes
Re: Outstanding Issues Pat Hayes
Re: A collection of issue resolutions Brian McBride
Re: A collection of issue resolutions Patrick Stickler
Re: rdfms-uri-substructure: some clarifying advice [was: A collection of issue resolutions] Dan Connolly
Re: rdfms-uri-substructure: some clarifying advice [was: A collection of issue resolutions] Brian McBride
call for agenda items Brian McBride
Re: A collection of issue resolutions Brian McBride
Re: migrating from M&S Frank Manola
Re: A collection of issue resolutions Patrick Stickler
Re: A collection of issue resolutions Patrick Stickler
RE: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Bill de hÓra
Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Patrick Stickler
RE: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Bill de hÓra
RE: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Bill de hÓra
migrating from M&S Bill de hÓra
Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Patrick Stickler
Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Frank Manola
Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Brian McBride
Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Patrick Stickler
Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Frank Manola
Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Patrick Stickler
Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Patrick Stickler
Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Brian McBride
Re: Reification: proposed resolution Patrick Stickler
Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Patrick Stickler
Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Patrick Stickler
Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Patrick Stickler
Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Dave Beckett

Tuesday, 12 February 2002

Re: Reification: proposed resolution Frank Manola
RE: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Ronald Daniel
Re: rdfms-uri-substructure: some clarifying advice [was: A collection of issue resolutions] Dan Connolly
Re: Reification: proposed resolution Jos De_Roo
rdfms-uri-substructure: some clarifying advice [was: A collection of issue resolutions] Dan Connolly
F2F Objectives and Agenda Brian McBride
Re: Outstanding Issues Brian McBride
A collection of issue resolutions Brian McBride
Reification: proposed resolution Brian McBride
Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Frank Manola
Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Brian McBride
Re: Outstanding Issues Brian McBride
Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Patrick Stickler
Re: Outstanding Issues Patrick Stickler
Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Patrick Stickler
RE: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Brian McBride
RE: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Bill de hÓra
Re: Outstanding Issues Graham Klyne
Re: Dublin Core and multiple element concern Graham Klyne
Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Brian McBride
Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Brian McBride
Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Jos De_Roo
Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Brian McBride
Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Patrick Stickler
Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Brian McBride
Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Patrick Stickler
Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Patrick Stickler

Monday, 11 February 2002

Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Brian McBride
Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Patrick Stickler
Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Brian McBride
Re: rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure [was Re: Outstanding Issues] Patrick Stickler
rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure [was Re: Outstanding Issues] Dave Beckett
xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Dave Beckett
Re: Entailment versus implication Patrick Stickler
Re: Dublin Core and multiple element concern Patrick Stickler
Re: Outstanding Issues Patrick Stickler
Re: BagID issue link Pat Hayes
Re: type/dtype/subclassing and range/subproperties Pat Hayes
Re: Dublin Core and multiple element concern Pat Hayes
Re: Entailment and bags (was:Re: Agenda items for the f2f) Brian McBride
Re: Entailment and bags (was:Re: Agenda items for the f2f) Pat Hayes
Re: Entailment versus implication Pat Hayes
Outstanding Issues Brian McBride
Re: doing provenance in RDF 1.0 clarified Patrick Stickler
Re: doing provenance in RDF 1.0 clarified Patrick Stickler
Re: One final step to datatyping convergence and closure? Patrick Stickler
Re: BagID issue link Patrick Stickler

Sunday, 10 February 2002

Re: doing provenance in RDF 1.0 clarified Graham Klyne
Re: One final step to datatyping convergence and closure? Jos De_Roo
Re: doing provenance in RDF 1.0 clarified Brian McBride
Re: BagID issue link Brian McBride
Re: doing provenance in RDF 1.0 clarified Dan Brickley
Re: doing provenance in RDF 1.0 clarified Jos De_Roo
Re: doing provenance in RDF 1.0 clarified Brian McBride
doing provenance in RDF 1.0 clarified jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com

Saturday, 9 February 2002

Re: One final step to datatyping convergence and closure? Pat Hayes
Re: Datatyping Summary V5 (skippable) Patrick Stickler
simple entailment testcase [Was: Re: reification test case] jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com

Friday, 8 February 2002

One final step to datatyping convergence and closure? Patrick Stickler
Minutes, 2002-02-08 teleconference Graham Klyne
BagID issue link Jeremy Carroll
Re: reification decision process intro Pat Hayes
BagID issue link Jeremy Carroll
Re: Dublin Core and multiple element concerns Jeremy Carroll
Re: Dublin Core and multiple element concerns Dan Connolly
Re: Datatyping Summary V5 (skippable) Brian McBride
Re: Datatyping and idioms Graham Klyne
Re: reification decision process intro Frank Manola
Re: Datatyping Summary V5 (skippable) patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Re: reification decision process intro Jos De_Roo
Re: reification decision process intro jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Re: reification decision process intro Brian McBride
Re: reification decision process intro Frank Manola
Re: Datatyping Summary V5 (skippable) Jos De_Roo
Re: reification decision process intro Jos De_Roo
Datatyping Summary V5 (skippable) Brian McBride
Re: type/dtype/subclassing and range/subproperties Jos De_Roo
Re: Datatypes Convergence patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Re: Dublin Core and multiple element concern patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Re: Datatyping and idioms patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Re: type/dtype/subclassing and range/subproperties patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Re: RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-02-01 Dan Brickley
MT publication, dropped ball Dan Brickley
reification decision process intro Frank Manola

Thursday, 7 February 2002

Re: Some words about formal semantics Graham Klyne
new Primer draft Frank Manola
Re: Some words about formal semantics Frank Manola
Some words about formal semantics Graham Klyne
Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-08 bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Re: Dublin Core and multiple element concerns Brian McBride
Re: RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-02-01 Brian McBride
Re: summary of reification? Frank Manola
type/dtype/subclassing and range/subproperties Graham Klyne
RE: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Sum mary V4] Ronald Daniel
Re: RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-02-01 Brian McBride
Re: PRISM and multiple element concern Pat Hayes
Datatyping and idioms Graham Klyne
RE: Dublin Core and multiple element concern Ronald Daniel
Re: summary of reification? Pat Hayes
Re: summary of reification? Pat Hayes
Re: Dublin Core and multiple element concern Dave Beckett
Re: summary of reification? Pat Hayes
Re: A basis for convergence and closure? Pat Hayes
Re: Dublin Core and multiple element concern Pat Hayes
Dublin Core and multiple element concerns Dave Beckett
Re: Dublin Core and multiple element concern Dave Beckett
Re: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Sum mary V4] patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Re: Datatypes Convergence patrick.stickler@nokia.com
RE: summary of reification? Jeremy Carroll
Re: Dublin Core and multiple element concern Brian McBride
Dublin Core and multiple element concern Dave Beckett
RE: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Sum mary V4] Eric Miller
RE: summary of reification? Brian McBride
RE: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Sum mary V4] Brian McBride
Re: PRISM and multiple element concern Brian McBride
RE: summary of reification? Jeremy Carroll
RE: summary of reification? Jeremy Carroll
Re: PRISM and multiple element concern Brian McBride
Re: summary of reification? Jos De_Roo
Re: Datatypes Convergence Brian McBride
Re: summary of reification? Brian McBride
Re: A basis for convergence and closure? Brian McBride
Fwd: Connectivity at the Tech Plenary Brian McBride
Re: summary of reification? Graham Klyne
Re: summary of reification? Graham Klyne
Re: summary of reification? Jos De_Roo
Re: reification test case jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Re: A basis for convergence and closure? Pat Hayes
Re: Datatypes and xml:lang Pat Hayes
Re: A basis for convergence and closure? Jos De_Roo
Re: summary of reification? Pat Hayes
Re: summary of reification? Sergey Melnik
Re: Oh my GOD, another datatype document. Pat Hayes
Re: A basis for convergence and closure? Sergey Melnik

Wednesday, 6 February 2002

Re: A basis for convergence and closure? Pat Hayes
Re: Oh my GOD, another datatype document. Pat Hayes
Re: summary of reification? Pat Hayes
Re: summary of reification? Pat Hayes
Re: A basis for convergence and closure? jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Re: Datatypes Convergence Brian McBride
Re: summary of reification? Graham Klyne
Re: Datatypes Convergence Graham Klyne
Re: summary of reification? Graham Klyne
Re: A basis for convergence and closure? Graham Klyne
Re: Datatypes Convergence Daniel W. Connolly
Re: Datatypes Convergence Daniel W. Connolly
Re: summary of reification? Sergey Melnik
Re: ACTION 2002-01-24#4 responses on datatyping Pat Hayes
Re: summary of reification? Brian McBride
Re: Datatypes and xml:lang Patrick Stickler
Re: Datatypes Convergence Patrick Stickler
Re: Datatypes and xml:lang Pat Hayes
Re: A basis for convergence and closure? Patrick Stickler
Re: summary of reification? Pat Hayes
Re: reification test case Pat Hayes
Re: Oh my GOD, another datatype document. Patrick Stickler
Re: Oh my GOD, another datatype document. Patrick Stickler
Re: A basis for convergence and closure? Pat Hayes
Datatypes Convergence Brian McBride
Re: Oh my GOD, another datatype document. Pat Hayes
RE: Oh my GOD, another datatype document. Pat Hayes
ACTION 2002-01-24#4 responses on datatyping Jeremy Carroll
Re: Datatypes and xml:lang Patrick Stickler
Re: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Summary V4] Patrick Stickler
Re: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Summary V4] Graham Klyne

Tuesday, 5 February 2002

summary of reification? Sergey Melnik
Re: A basis for convergence and closure? Patrick Stickler
Re: Flower Power and Datatyping ~:-) Sergey Melnik
Re: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Summary V4] Patrick Stickler
Re: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Sum mary V4] Patrick Stickler
Re: Datatyping Summary V4 Sergey Melnik
Re: Reification puzzles (was: RE: reification test case) Jos De_Roo
RE: PRISM and multiple element concern - CORRECTION Ronald Daniel
Re: Monotonicity Sergey Melnik
RE: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Sum mary V4] Ronald Daniel
PRISM and multiple element concern Ronald Daniel
B5 storage: why did it go away? [was: why S...] Daniel W. Connolly
Re: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Summary V4] Daniel W. Connolly
RE: Datatyping, text case Jeremy Carroll
Re: reification test case Jos De_Roo
Re: A basis for convergence and closure? Patrick Stickler
Re: A basis for convergence and closure? Patrick Stickler
FW: RDFCore WG: Datatyping documents Patrick Stickler
RE: A basis for convergence and closure? Jeremy Carroll
RE: A basis for convergence and closure? Jeremy Carroll
Re: A basis for convergence and closure? Patrick Stickler
Re: A basis for convergence and closure? Patrick Stickler
RE: A basis for convergence and closure? Jeremy Carroll
RE: Oh my GOD, another datatype document. Jeremy Carroll
Re: Oh my GOD, another datatype document. Patrick Stickler
RE: Reification puzzles (was: RE: reification test case) Jeremy Carroll
RE: Monotonicity Jeremy Carroll
Re: scope of parseType [was: Re: Flower Power and Datatyping ~:-)] Dave Beckett
RE: Datatypes and xml:lang Jeremy Carroll
Re: Datatyping Summary V4 Patrick Stickler
Re: Reification puzzles (was: RE: reification test case) Graham Klyne
Re: reification test case Patrick Stickler
Re: Datatyping Summary Graham Klyne
Re: Datatyping Summary V4 Patrick Stickler
FW: Reification thing questions Patrick Stickler
A basis for convergence and closure? Patrick Stickler
Re: Datatypes and xml:lang Dave Beckett
Re: scope of parseType [was: Re: Flower Power and Datatyping ~:-)] Dave Beckett
RE: reification test case Bill de hÓra
RE: Reification puzzles (was: RE: reification test case) Bill de hÓra
RE: reification test case Bill de hÓra
Re: datatyping summary Patrick Stickler
Re: Entailment and bags (was:Re: Agenda items for the f2f) Brian McBride
Re: Datatyping Summary V4 Brian McBride
Re: reification test case Patrick Stickler
Re: reification test case Patrick Stickler
Re: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Summary V4] Patrick Stickler
Re: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Summary V4] Patrick Stickler
Re: Tidy literal nodes incompatable with current MT? Patrick Stickler
Entailment versus implication Patrick Stickler
Reification thing questions (was: Re: reification test case) Pat Hayes
Re: Datatyping Summary V4 Sergey Melnik

Monday, 4 February 2002

Re: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Summary V4] Pat Hayes

Tuesday, 5 February 2002

Re: reification test case Pat Hayes

Monday, 4 February 2002

Re: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Summary V4] Pat Hayes

Tuesday, 5 February 2002

Re: Datatyping Summary Sergey Melnik
Re: reification test case Pat Hayes
Reification puzzles (was: RE: reification test case) Pat Hayes
Re: reification test case Pat Hayes
Re: reification test case Jos De_Roo
Identity of things (was: Re: reification test case) Pat Hayes
RE: reification test case Pat Hayes
Re: Reject change to rdf:value Pat Hayes
Re: reification test case Pat Hayes
Re: reification test case Pat Hayes
Re: reification test case Pat Hayes
Re: reification test case Pat Hayes

Monday, 4 February 2002

Re: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Summary V4] Patrick Stickler
Re: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Summary V4] Jos De_Roo
Oh my GOD, another datatype document. Pat Hayes
Re: Datatyping Summary Sergey Melnik
Re: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Summary V4] Patrick Stickler
Re: For untidiness ... Patrick Stickler
Re: For untidiness ... Sergey Melnik
Re: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Summary V4] Graham Klyne
Re: Monotonicity Sergey Melnik
Re: first guess rdfr-theory [was:Re: reification test case] Graham Klyne
Re: Flower Power and Datatyping ~:-) Patrick Stickler
Re: Tidy literal nodes incompatable with current MT? Sergey Melnik
Re: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Summary V4] Graham Klyne
Re: Datatyping Summary V4 Graham Klyne
Re: Flower Power and Datatyping ~:-) Graham Klyne
Re: Flower Power and Datatyping ~:-) Sergey Melnik
Re: Flower Power and Datatyping ~:-) Sergey Melnik
first guess rdfr-theory [was:Re: reification test case] Jos De_Roo
Entailment and bags (was:Re: Agenda items for the f2f) Pat Hayes
Re: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Summary V4] Brian McBride
Re: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Summary V4] Patrick Stickler
Re: reification test case Patrick Stickler
why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Summary V4] Dan Connolly
Re: reification test case Patrick Stickler
RE: reification test case Jeremy Carroll
Re: reification test case Dan Connolly
Re: reification test case Brian McBride
Re: reification test case Dan Brickley
Re: Datatyping Summary V4 Patrick Stickler
RE: Datatyping Summary V4 Brian McBride
Re: reification test case Patrick Stickler
RE: Datatyping Summary V4 Jeremy Carroll
Re: Bermudan flowers: Query, I18N, and syntax vs semantics Patrick Stickler
Re: Bermudan flowers: Query, I18N, and syntax vs semantics Patrick Stickler
RE: Bermudan flowers: Query, I18N, and syntax vs semantics Jeremy Carroll
RE: Bermudan flowers: Query, I18N, and syntax vs semantics Jeremy Carroll
Re: reification test case Dan Brickley
Re: Bermudan flowers: Query, I18N, and syntax vs semantics Patrick Stickler
Re: Datatyping Summary V4 Patrick Stickler
Re: Datatyping Summary V4 Brian McBride
Re: reification test case Jos De_Roo
RE: reification test case Dan Connolly
Bermudan flowers: Query, I18N, and syntax vs semantics Jeremy Carroll
Re: Flower Power and Datatyping ~:-) Brian McBride
Re: Datatyping Summary V4 Patrick Stickler
RE: Datatyping Summary V4 Jeremy Carroll
Re: RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-02-01 Brian McBride
Re: Model theory for b-nodes [was: Re: reification test case] Patrick Stickler
RE: reification test case Jeremy Carroll
Model theory for b-nodes [was: Re: reification test case] Brian McBride
Datatyping Summary V4 Brian McBride
Re: reification test case Martyn Horner
Re: reification test case Brian McBride
Re: reification test case Graham Klyne
Re: reification test case Graham Klyne
Re: why not take just the 2 ??? Patrick Stickler
Re: reification test case jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Re: why not take just the 2 ??? jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Re: reification test case Patrick Stickler
Re: why not take just the 2 ??? Patrick Stickler
Re: why not take just the 2 ??? Patrick Stickler
Re: reification test case Patrick Stickler
Re: reification test case Dan Brickley

Sunday, 3 February 2002

Re: why not take just the 2 ??? jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Re: reification test case jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Re: Primer status and Re: RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-02-01 Frank Manola
Re: reification test case Frank Manola
Re: RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-02-01 Frank Manola
Re: Primer status and Re: RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-02-01 Graham Klyne
Re: reification test case Patrick Stickler
Re: why not take just the 2 ??? Patrick Stickler
Re: why not take just the 2 ??? Patrick Stickler
reification test case Brian McBride
Re: RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-02-01 Brian McBride
Re: why not take just the 2 ??? jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Re: Flower Power and Datatyping ~:-) Patrick Stickler
Re: why not take just the 2 ??? Patrick Stickler

Saturday, 2 February 2002

why not take just the 2 ??? jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Primer status and Re: RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-02-01 Frank Manola

Friday, 1 February 2002

Re: RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-02-01 Dan Connolly
RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-02-01 jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Re: Datatypes: the Bermuda Triangle, and how to fly over it. Sergey Melnik
Re: Datatypes and xml:lang Sergey Melnik
Flower Power and Datatyping ~:-) Sergey Melnik
Re: Datatypes: the Bermuda Triangle, and how to fly over it. Graham Klyne
Re: Datatypes: the Bermuda Triangle, and how to fly over it. jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Datatyping, text case Graham Klyne
Re: Datatyping Summary V3 Graham Klyne
Re: Datatypes: the Bermuda Triangle, and how to fly over it. Graham Klyne
Re: Datatypes: the Bermuda Triangle, and how to fly over it. Patrick Stickler
Re: Datatyping Summary V2 Patrick Stickler

Last message date: Thursday, 28 February 2002 16:57:07 UTC