- From: Ronald Daniel <rdaniel@interwoven.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 09:36:30 -0800
- To: "Daniel W. Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: RDF core WG <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Dan Connolly said > On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, Brian McBride wrote: > > At 11:15 04/02/2002 -0600, Dan Connolly wrote: > > >Yes, *if* one wants to use both idioms, one needs both sorts > > >of properties. > > That's my understanding and what the issue states, I think clearly. > > There's some lack of clarity somewhere; folks seem to be arguing: > > if communities need to use both datatyping idioms, > they need double properties. > > PRISM needs datatyping > => therefore > PRISM needs double properties > > which isn't a sound inference; it needs another premise: > > PRISM needs to use both datatyping idioms. > > I'm quite confident PRISM (and dublin core and most other apps) > will do just fine only using S-B. Indeed. After considering this, I've concluded that the 'double property definition' problem is a complete non-issue for PRISM. I don't presume to speak for any other group defining a vocabulary, of course. Ron
Received on Tuesday, 5 February 2002 12:37:10 UTC