Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)

On 2002-02-15 17:03, "ext Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org> wrote:


>> Do to RDF datatyping, you have three choices:
> 
> Again, argument by assertion.
> 
> I have a choice to use S-B whether this WG
> endorses it or not. If this WG endorses
> it, I'm likely to get more interoperability;
> I'd like that.

The S-B idiom is not RDF datatyping. It is
external-application specific datatyping because
nowhere in the RDF graph are the datatypes of
S-B idiom literals defined.

Patrick

--
               
Patrick Stickler              Phone: +358 50 483 9453
Senior Research Scientist     Fax:   +358 7180 35409
Nokia Research Center         Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com

Received on Friday, 15 February 2002 10:26:08 UTC