RE: summary of reification? from Jeremy Carroll on 2002-02-07 (w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org from February 2002)

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 13:22:19 -0000
To: "Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "Graham Klyne" <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>, "Pat Hayes" <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
Cc: "Sergey Melnik" <melnik@db.stanford.edu>, <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <JAEBJCLMIFLKLOJGMELDAEAGCDAA.jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>

Brian:
> then to be consistent 

I agree.

>  we must also decide that anything (and nothing) entails:
>
>   _:s <rdf:type> <rdf:Statment> .
>   _:s <rdf:subject> <subject> .
>   _:s <rdf:predicate> <predicate> .
>   _:s <rdf:object>    <object> .

> for any subject, predicate and object.

And consistently, I disagree with any special entailment for reification.

Jeremy

Received on Thursday, 7 February 2002 08:22:49 UTC